Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Analysing Drawings of Austrian Primary School Pupils` Perceptions of CLIL Lessons
Author(s):
Diana Millonig (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2014
Format:
Paper

Session Information

03 SES 06 B, Curriculum Renewal (Languages): Policy and Practice

Paper Session

Time:
2014-09-03
15:30-17:00
Room:
B111 Sala de Aulas
Chair:
Adam Handelzalts

Contribution

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is the simultaneous acquisition of subject knowledge and fluency in a foreign or second language (L2) which has been widely adopted in European schools. For Austrian primary schools policy implementation and its impact have been under-studied. Compulsory second language or foreign language learning was introduced into Austrian primary schools in 2003/4, however no extra curriculum time has been allocated for the first and second year pupils. Education policy stipulates that L2 learning should not replace subject lesson content it should be undertaken through integration into the curricula content of any subject except German. Suggestions from the government concerning the type of methods teachers should use in the lessons resemble a Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach. Teacher-led instruction is foreseen in the first phases of learning but as learner skills develop peer and group interaction should become the main pedagogical practice in the classroom. As far as possible L2 should be the classroom language and German kept to a minimum. The main linguistic aims involve the development of oral-aural skills for communicative proficiency, for example the learning and use of simple daily phrases. Factors regarding teachers own L2 skills and teacher training concerning the knowledge of L2 theories and methodologies for the teaching and learning of young children are relevant in distinct ways, two of which involve:

i. Pedagogical knowledge and competence of L2 teaching for L2 learning in conjunction with subject content curricula.

ii. Fulfilment of Government policy statement guidelines.

This paper describes how pupil drawings were used as a main source for investigating pupil perceptions of and feedback on the teacher's methodologies in use during the lessons and how they contributed to the overall findings concerning:

i. Reflections of education policy in classroom practice.

ii. Relationships to linguistic theory and knowledge during the lessons.

The research question dealt with in this presentation is a subarea of the main research question which investigates "What is happening in the CLIL classrooms of early learners in Austrian primary schools?".

The theoretical framework and perspectives embedded in this study are the social constructivist and communicative interactional language learning theories perceived by educational research as facilitators for functional classrooms involving the concept of CLIL.

Method

The methodological framework of this study was set in a mixed methods approach entailing the combination of post positivist and post-modernist paradigms. The research methods involved qualitative and quantitative data collection. A constructivist grounded theory approach (Charmaz, 2003) was used for the data analysis enabling more flexibility in the strategies of discovery required in this study. Qualitative data collection consisted of ethnographic case studies, individual semi structured interviews, pupil drawings and documentary evidence of teacher training programmes. Quantitative methods involved data collection of a small teacher survey and pupil picture questionnaire. The case studies involved ethnographic observation of two separate classrooms of second year pupils at two separate primary schools during their L2 lessons. Investigation of pupil perceptions of the CLIL lessons required a data collection tool that would enable the young pupils to easily communicate their understanding and knowledge where verbal and written skills may not yet be sufficiently developed. Drawings were an appropriate choice as research studies have shown that they can provide an alternative means of representation and communication (Pantaleo, 2005 and Rabey 2003). Two drawings from each pupil in the two case study classrooms were collected during two separate lessons. The first drawing investigated pupil perceptions of the teaching methods in use. The second drawing investigated pupil perceptions of English and was not confined to the school context. Upon completion of each drawing, a short discussion concerning the drawing contents with each individual pupil was undertaken and audio recorded. The analysis of the drawings was undertaken in the framework developed by Kress and Van Leeuwen`s (1996) visual "grammar" based upon Halliday`s (1994) theory involving the ideational, interpersonal and textual meanings contained within the drawings. The visual grammar analysis (Kress and van Leeuwen, 1996) of both drawings from each case study classroom underwent further analysis through the lens of general and language learning theories. Relationships to intentions, beliefs, pedagogical strategies applied during the lessons by each case study teacher and education statement policy were made. To aid the complex analysis, the computer assisted qualitative data tool N.Vivo was used. Prior to data collection all ethical considerations and procedures necessary were undertaken and resolved.

Expected Outcomes

Findings between drawing one and drawing two from the two case study classrooms differed extensively. The interpretative analysis of both drawing sets revealed a contrast in teaching approaches between the two teachers, suggesting an unevenness in the extent to which the national curriculum for primary English is being delivered. Reflections of education policy guidelines involving a CLT approach was identified only in the drawings of the second case study classroom. L2 integration into subject content was not observed in the findings of either of the case study classrooms. The overall findings reveal that despite significant differences of teaching style and both teachers` belief that they are following official Government policy in integrating English into their subject classes, neither in fact fully reflects official policy. Blending and interpretation of the complete study findings provided rich description to answer the main research question and subareas but cannot be fully reported here due to the word limit. To conclude, the present study provides useful information to assist the development of knowledge involving how curriculum content is influenced when working in the framework of a CLIL context. The use of multiple data sources including pupils` drawings, interviews, questionnaires, direct observation and the case studies found that classroom practice is linked to teachers` understanding of language learning theories and of particular approaches such as CLIL.

References

Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Sage Publications. Halliday, MAK. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. Pantaleo, S. (2005). "Reading" young children's visual texts. Early Childhood Research and Practice 7 (1): http:// ecrp. uiuc.edu/v7n1/pantaleo.html. QSR International Pty Ltd (2012). NVivo10. Microsoft Partner. Rabey, K. (2003). Thinking aloud. Looking at children drawing in response to picture books. In Arizpe, E. & Styles, M. (eds.). Children Reading Pictures. Interpretating Visual Texts. London: Routledge Falmer.

Author Information

Diana Millonig (presenting / submitting)
Open University UK
Mautern

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.