16 SES 05 B JS, Questioning the Net Generation
Paper Session, Joint Session NW 06 and NW 16
The Norwegian curriculum reform of 2006 includes digital skills as one of five basic skills (the ability to read, the ability to write, numeracy, oral skills and digital skills) that should be integrated into every subject area. One of the basic components of digital skills is digital responsibility and the ability to critically evaluate online resources, digital media and being aware of privacy rights and the consequences of ones choices online. At the same time there are assumptions that teenagers today are digitally native and therefore aware of most of the challenges connected to the use of digital technology.
The concept of the ‘digital native’ is often applied to the generation born in the digital age, and relates to debates on what it means being digitally competent (Prensky, 2001; Tapscott, 1998). Digital natives are considered to be digitally literate and capable of using digital tools extensively as a result of their familiarity with digital technology and social networking from an early age. According to such approaches, today’s students should be categorised as digital natives. It has however been questioned whether digital natives are in fact as digitally competent as they are assumed to be. We claim that it can be argued that the use of digital technology in schools has led to overgeneralisations about the digital competence of students. Such generalisations have resulted in the myth that young people are more competent than they actually are.
With increased use of the Internet and digital technology in teaching and learning as well as the use of social networking activities there is therefore a continuous need for raising the awareness around digital responsibility. Young people today use digital technology both at home for leisure activities as well as at school. Consequently they are active online citizens. In order to measure young people’s knowledge and critical reflection on aspects around issues such as safe Internet use, privacy, social networking and cyber bullying we conducted a study including questions on these aspects.
Our main objective in this paper is to present a study on digital competence with special focus on factors measuring digital responsibility by 9 graders in Norway. This is an annual study conducted by the research unit at the Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education on a wide range of aspects connected to access, use and attitudes towards the use of digital technology at school. In this paper we focus in particular on the aspects connected to digital responsibility and social networking. The specific research questions are: 1) What kind of social networking activities are the students participating in; 2) What is the student’s knowledge about rules for privacy and re-use of other student’s pictures? And 3) What is the relationship between student’s frequency of use and their competence? We consider the digital responsibility of the students in comparison to the aims of the Norwegian National Curriculum (2006), which requires students leaving lower secondary school to be familiar with aspects connected to e-safety, such as privacy rights, copyrights, information evaluation and source credibility.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2006) National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/ Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for Basic Skills. Retrieved from http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/_english/Framework-for-Basic-Skills/ Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon. Retrieved from http://www.nnstoy.org/download/technology/Digital Natives - Digital Immigrants.pdf Selwyn, N. (2008). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.