Creative Intelligence: Qualitative, Quantitative or Mixed Methods?

Author(s):

Linda Taylor

Conference:

ECER 2009

Network:

21. Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)

Format:

Paper

Session Information

SES G6, Pre Conf Parallel Session

Time:

2009-09-26

11:00-12:30

Room:

HG, HS 31

Chair:

Hans-Christoph Koller

Contribution

This presentation will expound on the theoretical construct of creative intelligence as it applies to research. Torrance's creative problem solving model will be applied mediate the controversy between qualitative and quantitative research and identify how mixed method research can mediate the conflict. The controversy between quantitative and qualitative research is a philosophical debate not a debate about methodology. This presentation will also describe the methodological differences in order to comprehend more fully the philosophical differences. Multiple mixed method research designs will be presented.

Method

This presentation will provide a meta-analysis (inclusive of qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods) of creative intelligence with a focus on creative problem solving.

Expected Outcomes

The outcomes of this study indicate how creative problem solving is best studied via a mixed method research design. This can mediate problems arising from qualitative and qualitative research designs.

References

Campbell, D. & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. Creswell, G & Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Firestone, W. (1987). Meaning in Method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 16(7), 16-21. Giddens, A. (1976).New Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Basic. Howe, K. (1992). Getting over the quantitative-qualitative debate. American Journal of Education, 100(2), 236-256. Howe, K. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16. Maddox, C.D. (1990). The Qualitative/Quantitative Research Debate: Extremism in the educational pendulum. Computers in the Schools, 7(3), 35-45. Sale, J., Lohfeld, L., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity, 36, 43-53. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (eds) (2003). Handbook of Mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Author Information

Linda Taylor

University of Idaho

Counseling and School Psychology

Moscow

220

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER.

Search the ECER Programme

Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
Search for authors and in the respective field.
For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.