The Effects of Irregular School Transitions on Military Children's Relationship Orientations and the Impact upon Educational Attainment
Author(s):
Georgina Shaw (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 05 A, Intercultural Encounters in Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
11:00-12:30
Room:
332. [Main]
Chair:
Ghazala Bhatti

Contribution

This study investigates the impact of 'irregular school transitions' upon friendship orientations and educational attainment of military children. Irregular transition is understood as joining or leaving a school outside normal entry and exit points. This is now a major educational issue in Britain (Dobson, & Pooley, 2004; Machin, Telhaj & Wilson, 2006), and other countries including the United States (GAO, 1994) and New Zealand (Lauder et al, 1994). It is now a feature of so many children’s educational experiences; research suggests over 40% of students move schools aged between 9 and 14 (UK Key stages 3 and 4) (Goldstein Burgess & McConnell. 2007). A number of large scale quantitative studies have identified an academic penalty for these students (Simmons et al., 1987, see also Coleman, 1990). This has been explained by the breakdown in social capital between the student’s family, school and community (Coleman, 1988; Hagan et al., 1999). Theories of social capital have since been developed to consider social factors, concerns and conditions that can be seen to mediate students’ responses to school transitions, particularly in relation to processes of inclusion, exclusion and motivation (Brown, 2012). When a child starts a new school s/he must learn to navigate  competing cultural expectations, pedagogies, ‘norms’ and performances from the institution, teachers, parents and peer groups which may include adapting to pedagogical shifts between expressive and instrumental cultures of schooling (Power et al., 1998).  This is especially important to consider with respect to the children of military families.

 

There is little research into irregular school transitions in military families in the UK.  Some studies in the USA (e.g., Park, 2011, see also Lowe et al, 2012) and UK (Lovett, Tissot & Francis-Brophy, 2011) have provided evidence suggesting irregular transitions may have a negative impact on the social and emotional wellbeing of children and families. However there is less evidence highlighting effects on educational attainment of military children.   A small body of research suggests that frequency and timing of transition can have negative effects on education (Department for Education [DfE], 2010; Lovett et al, 2011; Ofsted, 2011;).  Although some research suggests an overall positive picture of attainment (NFER, 2007, see also DfE, 2010), such evidence is tentative because of difficulties associated with tracking military children, as they can face up to fourteen moves by the time they enter secondary school.  (Ministry of Defence [MoD] 2011; NFER, 2008; Ofsted, 2011). 

 

Investigating the impact of ‘irregular school transitions’ upon  friendships and educational attainment will provide insight on friendship related challenges military children face and the impact upon their educational outcomes providing information to  develop interventions and policy to improve children’s lives.  Studying NATO forces families provides a rich opportunity to gain insight from a cross cultural perspective and is not limited to military families.  It has relevance to all mobile groups (traveller families, migrant children, children in care) having international significance.

 

 

Research Questions:

  1. What are the impacts of educational transition upon the friendship orientations and educational attainment of military children?
  2. How can children’s friendship-related responses to transition help us better understand the impact on educational attainment?
  3. Do key familial variables (attachment security, familial boundary dissolution, familial conflict) buffer the impacts of transition upon   (a)friendship orientations (b) educational attainment and (c) how, if such moderation is evident, does it appear to work? 

 

Method

This study adopts a critical realist approach allowing for an epidemiological position aiming at understanding subjective meaning in a contextual form. A longitudinal case study approach using mixed method sequential approach was used over two phases: Phase 1, Quantitative: To identify patterns of family and friendship related factors in explaining child’s school attainment variance. Methods: Online survey to parents and telephone interviews with children using Self report measures based upon Adolescent Attachment Interview and McGill Friendship Questionairre Phase 2: Qualitative: To explain reasons behind identified patterns, and explored possible anomalies In understanding how military children respond to transition in a friendship sense; how friendship-related challenges impact on educational attainment and how familial variables were involved in the process. Methods: semi structured interviews, participant observations and educational tracking Participants The study group comprised families of serving personnel located within a number of UK Army and Foreign National bases of approximately 500 Serving personnel of which 200 were estimated eligible for the study. Children aged between 9 and 14 were selected for Phase 2 presenting different variations of friendship and familial characteristics in order to track educational progress over time frame and collate data using participant observation and interviews that will be adapted in an ongoing nature throughout the study in concord with findings from observations, attainment and interviews.

Expected Outcomes

This study is ongoing but has yielded some significant insights into the impact of irregular transitions on the friendship and education related challenges military children face when moving to new schools and locations. Already this has informed possible interventions and policy helping to support military families transitions. Early findings indicate some effect on friendship and education related factors as a result of high mobility assessed against attachment behaviours and familial characteristics. Of particular interest for those families whose first language is not English, schools have developed positive strategies to bridge and bond with children and families which appear to relate to positive relationship and educational approach by students. Some evidence suggests children with secure attachments adopt buffering strategies to help transitions and friendship orientations and there may be some evidence that suggests that socioeconomic and family background and position may play a significant part in influencing children’s friendship related patterns and educational progression.

References

Brown, C. (2012). Exploring how Social Capital Works for Children who have Experienced School Turbulence. What is the Role of Friendship and Trust for Children in Poverty? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(3), 213-236 Coleman, J. (1988). 'Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital', American Journal of Sociology, 94 95-120. Coleman, J. S (1990). Equality and Achievement in Education. Boulder, CO: Westfield Press. DfE. (2010). The Educational Performance of Children of Service Personnel. London:DfE. Dobson, J., and E. Pooley. (2004). Mobility, Equality and Diversity: A study of pupil mobility in the secondary school system. London: UCL, Migration Research Unit GAO. General Accounting Office (1994). Elementary School Children: Many Change Schools Frequently Harming Their Education. Report to the Honourable Marcy Kaptur, House of Representatives, Feburary, Washington DC Goldstein, H., S. Burgess, and B. McConnell. (2007). Modelling the effect of pupil mobility on school differences in educational achievement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 170(4), 941–54. Lauder, H., Hughes, D., Waslander, S., Thrupp, M., McGlinn, J., Netwon, S. and Dupuis. (1994). The Creation for Market Competition in New Zealand. Wellington, Ministry of Education Lovett, G., Tissot, C. & Francis-Brophy E. (2011). Supporting Educational Transitions: Exploring the specific needs of Service children and their families. University of Reading: Manuscript in preparation. Lowe, K., Adams, K., Browne, B. & Hinkle, K. (2012). Impact of military deployment on family relationships, Journal of Family Studies, 18(1), 17-27. Machin, S, Telhaj, S, Wilson, J. (2006). The Mobility of English School Children. London:Centre for the Economics of Education. Park, N. (2011). Military children and families: Strengths and challenges during peace and war American Psychologist, 66(1), 65-72. MoD, (2010, 2011, 2012) Tri Service Families Survey Continuations Attitude Surveys available from Gov.Uk https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tri-service-families-survey-continuous-attitude-survey-famcas NFER. (2007, 2008). Service Children’s Education: Survey of Parental Views (Final Report). NFER. Ofsted. (2011). Children in Service families: The quality and impact of partnership provision for children in Service families. London:Ofsted. Power, S., Whitty, G., Edwards, T. & Wigfall, V. 1998). Schools Families and Academic Able Students: contrasting modes of involvement in secondary education. British journal of Sociology of Education. 19(2), 157-176. Simmons, R., Burgeson, R., Carlton-Ford, S, Blythe, D. (1987). The Impact of Cumulative Change in Early Adolescence, Child Development, 58(5) 1220 34.

Author Information

Georgina Shaw (presenting / submitting)
University of Bath
Eduction
Gloucestershire

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.