Teachers’ Social and Emotional Learning and teacher-student relationships: What do teachers and students say?
Author(s):
Maria Poulou (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
09:00-10:30
Room:
101.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Peter Gray

Contribution

It is often stated that teaching is a job requiring great “emotional labor” (Hargreaves, 2001). However, surprisingly little is known about how teachers’ emotional experiences relate to their teaching practices, how they regulate their emotions, their relationships with students or how important teachers’ emotional experiences are to students’ behavior (Sutton & Wheatley, 2003). Factors which could help to explain competent teacher behavior and positive classroom outcomes overlap with the concept of Emotional Intelligence (EI), which refers to the perception of emotions, use of emotions to facilitate thinking, understanding of emotions and management of emotions (Salovey & Mayer, 1990). Teachers’ perceived EI has been found to be important in establishing better working relationships with students, and negatively related to students’ misconduct (Brackett, Reyes, Rivers, Elbertson, & Salovey 2011; Nizielski, Hallum, Lopes, & Schutz, 2012).

EI has also been useful in explaining individual differences in teachers’ Social and Emotional Learning (SEL), the process of acquiring skills in recognizing and managing emotions, developing care and concern for others, making responsible decisions, establishing positive relationships and handling challenging situations effectively (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009). Socially and emotionally competent teachers set the tone of the classroom by developing supportive relationships with their students and coaching students through conflict situations (Jennings & Greenberg, 2009).

Teachers’ emotional support is a protective factor for the relational functioning of students at risk of emotional and behavioral difficulties (Buyse, Verschueren, Doumen, Damme, & Maes, 2008), while conflict in teacher-student relationships has the potential to strengthen behavior problems (Silver, Measelle, Armostrong, & Essex, 2005). However, the plethora of research emphasizing the importance of teacher-student relationships and their interconnection to students’ behavioral challenges at schools, does not take into account teachers’ perceptions of their own social and emotional abilities, their competence to implement SEL in their classrooms, and the way these teacher factors influence classroom interactions and students’ behavior. Teachers can teach children to relieve stress, manage anger and deal with social interactions, as well as fostering a sense of safety and well-being in children. This assumes however that teachers are already socially and emotionally skilled and also feel competent implementing SEL with their students, particularly with students with emotional and behavioral difficulties. In the current study we explored teachers’ perceptions of their EI, competence in teaching social and emotional skills to their students and teacher-student relationships, in an attempt to interpret students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties in elementary classrooms.

 

Objectives of the study   

The aim of the current study was to investigate how teachers’ perceptions of their EI and competence in implementing SEL, influence their perceptions of teacher-student relationships and students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties. We hypothesized that teachers with higher EI and SEL would report closer relationships with students, and would be less likely to report emotional and behavioral difficulties to their students.

As findings based solely on teacher self-reports may suffer from bias (Wubbels, Brekelmans, & Hooymayers, 1992), we also drew on students’ perceptions of their behavior difficulties. We explored whether teachers’ perceptions of EI, competence to implement SEL with their students and teacher-student relationships have an additional, independent contribution to our understanding of students' behavior, according to students themselves. Based on similarity with teachers’ based studies, we hypothesized that students would report less behavior problems with teachers high in EI, SEL implementation and positive teacher-student relationships. At the same time, based on the research findings up to date, we would expect minimal agreement between teacher and students’ perceptions of students’ behavior difficulties.

Method

Participants Participants were 98 elementary teachers from public schools of central Greece (28 male, 70 female, with teaching experience 1-14 years). Teachers were asked to complete questionnaires about themselves and their students, on a voluntary basis. In sum, 617 questionnaires were completed, for 304 male and 313 female students, aged 9 and 11 years old, respectively. Subsequently a random sample of 35 teachers (18 male, and 17 female, asked their students to complete questionnaires about their behavior. Three hundred and three students (154 male, and 154 female, 11 years old) completed a questionnaire about their emotional and behavioral difficulties. Measurement 1. Self-Rated Emotional Intelligence Scale (SREIS) Teacher EI was measured with the Self-Rated Emotional Intelligence Scale (SREIS; Brackett, Rivers, Shiffman, Lerner, & Salovey, 2006). The scale includes 4 items related to perception of emotions 3 items related to use of emotions, 4 items related to understanding of emotions and 8 items related to management of emotions: 4 relating to management of one’s own emotions and 4 relating to social management of emotion. 2. Teacher SEL Beliefs Scale Teachers’ perceptions of their competence in teaching SEL were measured with the Teacher SEL Beliefs Scale (Brackett, Reyes, Rivers & Elbertson, & Salovey, 2012). In current study we used two subscales: a) SEL comfort, which relates to comfort with and regular implementation of SEL practices in the classroom and b) SEL commitment, which relates to commitment to improving SEL skills. 3. Student-teacher relationships scale (STRS-SF) The Student-Teacher Relationships Scale-Short Form (STRS-SF) (Pianta, 2001) was used to measure teacher perceptions of teacher-student relationships. The closeness subscale measures the extent to which a teacher feels that his/her relationship with a student is characterized by warmth, affection and open communication, while the conflict subscale assesses the degree to which a teacher feels that his/her relationship with a specific student is characterized by negativity. 3. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for teachers. Teachers’ perceptions of their students’ emotional and behavioural difficulties were measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Teacher-Form (SDQ, Goodman, 1999). We administered the four scales of SDQ: Hyperactivity Scale, Emotional Symptoms Scale, Conduct problems Scale, and Peer Problems Scale. 4. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for students. The self-report version of the SDQ can be completed by children and teenagers aged 11-17 years. We administered the four scales of SDQ: Hyperactivity Scale, Emotional Symptoms Scale, Conduct problems Scale, and Peer Problems Scale.

Expected Outcomes

Data were analyzed using Hierarchical regression analyses. Teachers’ ratings of EI was entered in Step 1 of the regression models, teacher SEL belief variables were entered in Step 2, and teacher-student relationship variables were entered in Step 3. The process was repeated using students’ perceptions of students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties as the predictor, in addition to teachers’ perceptions of students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties. Teachers’ perceptions of conflict was the only significant contribution to students’ emotional, conduct difficulties and hyperactivity, over and above the contribution of teacher EI and SEL perceptions. Teachers’ perceptions of conflict with their students also appeared to be the only significant contributor for students’ emotional, conduct and hyperactivity difficulties, according to students’ perceptions. Students additionally perceived conflict in teacher-student relationships to further determine their difficulties with peers. Finally, significant but moderate correlations were found between teachers and students’ perceptions of emotional and behavioral difficulties. Significance of the study The study has implications for practice and research. For practice, it is evident that enhancing positive teacher-student relationships, we could minimize students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties. Our findings underline the importance of teacher-training, in helping teachers to develop emotional abilities and skills (Nizielski et al, 2012). For research, the study suggests that perceptions of EI, SEL and teacher-student relationships could be considered as potential teacher-based factor to determine students’ emotional and behavioral difficulties. Educators and researchers need to be aware of the importance of teachers and students’ perceptions, and the way they are integrated seamlessly into teaching practice.

References

Brackett, M.A., Reyes, M.R., Rivers, S.E., Elbertson, N.A. & Salovey, P. (2011). Classroom emotional climate, teacher affiliation and student conduct. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46 (1), 27-36. Brackett, M.A., Reyes, M.R., Rivers, S.E., Elbertson, N.A. & Salovey, P. (2012). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about social and emotional learning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30 (3), 219-236. Brackett, M.A., Rivers, S.E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N. & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 780-795. Buyse, E., Verschueren, K., Doumen, S., Damme J. V. & Maes, F. (2008). Classroom problem behavior and teacher-child relationships in kindergarten: the moderating role of classroom climate. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 367-391. Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40 (5), 791-799. Hargreaves, A. (2001). The emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1056-1080. Jennings, P.S. & Greenberg, M.T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79 (1), 491-525. Nizielski, S., Hallum, S., Lopes, P.N. & Schutz, A. (2012). Attention to student needs mediates the relationship between teacher emotional intelligence and student misconduct in the classroom. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30 (4), 320-329. Pianta, R.C. (2001). The Student-Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS). Lutz, F.L: Psychological Assessment Resources. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185-211. Silver, R. B., Measelle, J. R., Armostrong, J. M. & Essex, M. J. (2005). Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics and the teacher-child relationships during the school transition. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 39-60. Sutton, R.E. & Wheatley, K.E. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15 (4), 327-358. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M. & Hooymayers, H.P.M (1992). Do teacher ideals distort the self-reports of their interpersonal behaviour? Teaching and Teacher Education, 8 (1), 47-58.

Author Information

Maria Poulou (presenting / submitting)
University of Patras
Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education,
Athens

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.