How Happiness Contributes to Sustainability And What It Implies For Education
Author(s):
Jochen Dallmer (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

30 SES 05 A, ESE in Early Childhood (Part 2)

Paper Session continues from 30 SES 04 A

Time:
2015-09-09
11:00-12:30
Room:
X. Előadó [C]
Chair:
Matthias Barth

Contribution

The overall research project (PhD thesis) explores what contribution insights from happiness research could contribute to the current debate on spreading of sustainable lifestyles, especially in western industrialized societies. With this question, the project refers to contemporary discourses on sustainable lifestyles (sufficiency), post-growth, as well as concepts and indices on prosperity and well-being. The work refers to the increasingly relevant argument, that to achieve a sustainable development not only efficiency and consistency are needed, but also more focus on sufficiency is necessary. (Stengel 2011)

Current research shows a clear discrepancy between knowledge and action of individuals in the field of sustainability. An important aspect of this is the fact that sustainable lifestyles are usually connoted with waiver, limitation, loss. In particular, the concept of sufficiency has had negative connotations for long and is still commonly perceived as deprivation in the consumer oriented westen industrial societies.

But recently concepts of sustainable development are more and more often linked to ideas of 'the good life' or well-being, from Gross National Happiness in Buthan to Buen Vivir in Ecuador, from the UN to initiatives in the EU – countries are looking for new indicators to measure well-being beyond material wealth. (Martens 2010; UN 2012)

Empirical research shows that happiness/subjective well-being is connected to a less material lifestyle: enjoying more leisure, taking care of social interactions with friends and family, pursuing artistic interests, engaging in meaningful (and often socially beneficial) work and enjoying nature. (Seligman 2002; Layard 2005; Skidelski 2012)

While well-being therefore appears to be a promising path to sustainability, only few people seem to actively pursue such lifestyle of well-being and opt for a good life alternative to the goods life. Despite the hurdles of influences, temptations and manipulations of the consumer society, taking a deliberate choice for ones lifestyle is possible. Here the question arises: What does it need to pursue well-being? When, where and how do (young) people actually learn about well-being? How can this be connected with Learning for sustainability?

Generally education seems to have put little attention on Happiness at all (Noddings 2003). But in recent years new approaches develop: first schools have introduced 'happiness' as a subject and various educational tool-kits mention life quality and well-being. (O'Brien 2008, 2010)

Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), the leading educational concept regarding sustainability, is albeit its focus on skills and capabilities not yet mentioning the topic of well-being. (Overwien 2012) EDS could though be a fertile soil for addressing (individual and global) well-being. As individual well-being is linked with the common good and vice versa, the topic of sustainable development is approached from a different ankle, yet strongly centered in a “happiness based approach”, featuring e.g. a “happiness competence”.

Method

The topic presented above is a PhD Project. It is based in the field of theoretical work, combining political sciences and education. It explores the possible link between happiness and sustainability: the hypothesis is created that subjective well-being (happiness) and sustainable lifestyles (sufficiency) are not opposite, but can be productively linked. Accordingly, the work will explore approaches as of how concepts of happiness and sustainable development could be combined and complement each other. This will be done in three steps: 1. By means of theoretical analysis of literature from the fields of happiness research, sustainability research, as well as political theory is the hypothesis – split into several sub-theses - to be verified. 2. Evaluating given empirical research will explore what specific, measurable changes in individual behavior (e.g. Consumption) could be determined if the individual behaviour is based on the theme of subjective well-being. 3. Seeking implications for educational concepts on sustainability, esp. regarding the concept of Education for sustainable Development (ESD). In addition, obstacles and barriers should be identified, which could hinder the practical implementation of "happiness centered sustainability concepts". Full title of the PhD: Happiness and Sustainability. Subjective well-being as Leitmotiv of sustainable development – an alternative to the deprivation connoted concepts of sufficient lifestyles?

Expected Outcomes

Learning about well-being could bring a new approach on learning about sustainability, thus bridging the gap between knowledge and action of individuals regarding sustainable lifestyles. It also could alter the given perception that sustainable lifestyles signify waiver, limitation and loss of quality of life. Education for well-being and happiness needs a multidimensional and interdisciplenary approach, connecting many fields of studies and subjects in schools. From philosophy and social sciences, arts, physical education, nourishment and many more. Core topics it would need to cover are: 1) Psychological and physical well-being of the individual. 2) Social and political frameworks of well-being: justice, fairness and freedom. 3) Ecology, nature, happiness. 4) Global aspects – links between sustainability and well-being. A critical perspective is needed! Learning about well-being and happiness is clearly different from making people feel happy. An example of the ambiguity in the field is the concept of Positive Education, based on findings of Positive Psychology: here students shall learn about their strength and focus on positive events, as this promotes well-being and health. They shall thus become more resilient against the usual stress they are exposed to. (Seligman 2009) Such approaches are limited in their own design and have little impact for sustainability. A broader approach on learing about well-being should be contributing to emancipating the individual - it needs to be more than making people 'more successful performers' in their given environment or a tool to 'pacify' society, 'keeping people happy with what is'. Education for well-being in a holstic sense could contribute to two of the main main challenges: - closing the gap between knowledge on environmental issues and doing/behaviour/being active, as happiness invites individual perspectives and interests strongly into the topic of sustainability. - distinguishing between wealth and well-being, thereby inviting a change of concepts on development in a broader sense

References

Layard, Richard (2005): Die glückliche Gesellschaft. Martens, Jens (2010): Thinking Adead. Development Models and Indicators of Well-Being Beyong the MDGs. Berlin Noddings, Nel (2003): Happiness and Education. O'Brien, Catherine (2008): Sustainable Happiness: How Happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. In: Canadian Psychology, 2008, Vol. 49, No. 4, S. 290 O'Brien, Catherine (2010): Sustainability, Happiness and Education. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol. 1, May 2010 Overwien, Bernd (2012): Kompetenzmodelle im Lernbereich globale Entwicklung – Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In: Gritschke, Hannah et al. (Hrsg.)(2012): Erkennen, Bewerten, (Fair-)Handeln. Seligman, M. (2002): Authentic Happiness. Seligman, M. et al. (2009): Positive education: positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford Review of Education. Vol 35. No 3, pp. 293-311 Skidelsky, R; Skidelsky, E. (2012). How much is enough? Stengel, Oliver (2011): Suffizienz. Die Konsumgesellschaft in der ökologischen Krise. UN (2012): Defining a New Economic Paradigm: The Report of the High-Level Meeting on Wellbeing and Happiness.

Author Information

Jochen Dallmer (presenting / submitting)
University Kassel
Berlin

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.