The effects of monitoring and accountability on pedagogic practice in Further Education, and creating a positive change in that environment
Author(s):
Shane Payne (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Network:
Emerging Researchers' Group (for presentation at Emerging Researchers' Conference)
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES D 15, Practices and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-07
13:30-15:00
Room:
395. [Main]
Chair:
Lázaro Moreno Herrera

Contribution

Further Education (FE) has become a competitive market, and with the marketization of the sector comes a responsibility to be more cost effective and in turn more accountable. This study explores how the effects of monitoring and accountability have impacted on the lecturers’ pedagogic practice and has created a narrowing of the curriculum. As a result, the students are not being given the opportunity to achieve to the best of their ability and develop higher order thinking skills. This study will endeavour to find a pedagogic method that will address this issue.

The focus of the research is as follows:

What are the effects of monitoring and accountability on pedagogic practice in the FE classroom, and how can a positive change be created in that environment?

The research questions are:

  1. How do lecturers experience monitoring and accountability in the FE classroom and what has that meant for learning and teaching?

  2. How do the lecturers plan, teach, assess and evaluate sessions, and what is done if a student or students fall below their expected level of progress?

  3. What do the lecturers believe to be the most effective aspects of their lessons in relation to learning and teaching? Why?

  4. What do lecturers believe to be the ideal lesson for building learning and teaching? Why?

  5. What is the impact of a revised approach to pedagogy on student learning?  

The research questions 1 – 4 are exploratory and are designed to inform the actions that will be taken to address question 5. 

  

Epistemologically, my view is that knowledge is whatever I deem to be practically useful for any aspect of the study. Given that I will be using an iterative process where the detail and direction may change in terms of the acquired knowledge, the nature of the knowledge or the understanding of the knowledge, an epistemological stance of pragmatism will be adopted. For the pragmatist, an ideology can only be true if thoughts, beliefs and statements are verified by generating practical consequences (Gray, 2014; Howell, 2013). Therefore, the pragmatic approach to research asserts that questions cannot be based on theory alone, there must be some element of practical experience to support it (Dewey, 1950). Pragmatism’s renewed popularity is in some part because it provides an epistemological justification to mix different methods and approaches (Onwuegbuzie et al., 2009).

Ontologically, the research will be conducted from a realist and idealistic metaphysical perspective. The realist metaphysical position will be adopted because, independently of thought, it accepts objects and events for what they are (Rescher, 2003); their properties, and how they relate to each other are part of the nature of the world regardless of whether or not we know about them (Khlentzos, 2011). This will be complemented by an idealistic metaphysics, which contends that occurrences that are observed are ‘phenomenon of the brain’ that require an application of thought and reflection to help shape my interpretation of the events (Schopenhaur, 1966): 15-16).

An approach of Appreciative Inquiry will be used to highlight current positive aspects of pedagogic practice of participating lecturers, before identifying pedagogic methods that could be used or modified to improve the learning opportunities for the students. With an epistemological stance of pragmatism, Action Research will be the vehicle used to apply the changes and collect data. Accepting the complexity of the FE classroom, and the many interconnected strands that may need to be investigated, the bricolage approach will used to support a realist and idealistic ontological approach giving the freedom to determine what reality is and free the researchers from any single philosophical stance.

Method

Appreciative Inquiry: is a method that will be applied to the study to show how procedures and structures work when at their best. It explores the best approach to personal change by engaging in dialogue and raising positive questions based on successes, dreams, hopes and aspirations (Kelm, 2011; Whitney and Trosten-Bloom, 2003). By considering these aspects along with the strengths, I will be in a position to identify ways in which practice could be transformed for the better. Appreciative Inquiry is both collaborative and participatory and relies on interactive techniques such as discussion and interviews to inform the action research (Whitney and Trosten-Bloom, 2003). Action Research: will be used as the basis for developing change (research question 5) to develop and trial the practical and theoretical changes that we want to incorporate into the classroom to improve pedagogic practice. By taking positive, practical action and making changes towards the classroom approach, I will be able to interpret the participants’ views on how well (or not) the actions went towards addressing a particular area of focus. The original action research model by Lewin (1946) involves 3 moments in a cyclical process. For this study I have chosen to use the extended action research model by Townsend (2013), which consists of 6 stages. This action research model allows for changes of foci that may occur through regular reconnaissance and reflection, which will be ideal for the complex environment in which the study will be conducted. Bricolage: will be an important approach when carrying out the action research and analysing potentially large amounts of diverse data from a complex environment. To a degree, bricolage will free me as the researcher from the constraints of single philosophical stances allowing me to adopt a pragmatic perspective using those methods that best suit any particular context (Lévi-Strauss, 1966). However, bricolage is not an ‘anything goes’ approach but respects the complexity of interpreting the data, allowing the contextual circumstances to dictate the most appropriate mode of gathering and analysing data (Denzin and Lincoln, 1999). This flexibility of approach will give me the freedom to peel away the different layers of discovery, such as inter-relationships and external influences, that I may encounter whilst trying to understand an environment as complex as the classroom. Bricolage will give rigour and an informed and multi-perspectival way in which to discover the lived world (Bridges, 1997; Foster, 1997).

Expected Outcomes

The research conducted so far shows that monitoring and accountability does appear to have an effect on the pedagogic practice in the FE classroom. There are high expectations placed on lecturers to ensure that students achieve qualifications. One reason for this is that unlike compulsory education in the UK, full funding for students is only made available to FE institutions upon successful completion of courses. Therefore FE organisations are under pressure to generate as much funding as they can to remain operational, so they need as many students to pass their courses as possible. As a result, the responsibility placed on lecturers inevitably leads to them teaching to the test/unit criteria. The expected outcome for this study is that through discussion with the teaching staff on what they presently do well in the classroom, and what their ‘dream’ lesson would look like, we will be able to create a pedagogic approach that will be more effective in teaching the subjects to a better depth of knowledge. This will be achieved within the constraints resulting from the demands imposed by the monitoring and accountability on the sector. Appreciative Inquiry is a positive strategic approach to inform the Action Research, which is being used in an operational role to apply pedagogic approaches to the classroom. The views and feedback of both experienced lecturers and students will be used to inform the study. Data collected from each cycle of the action research will be thoroughly analysed and evaluated and will be used to inform the next cycle and the methods of data collection. The study may well conclude that a combination of different learning and teaching approaches used together will be the most effective way to ensure that deeper learning takes place along with the development of higher order thinking skills.

References

Bridges, D. (1997) Philosophy and educational research: A reconsideration of epistemological bounderies, Cambridge Journal of Education, 27 (2), 177-189. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds) (1999) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Dewey, J. (1950) Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn. Foster, R. (1997) Addressing epistemologic and practical issues in multi-method research: A procedure for conceptual triangulation. Advances in Nursing Education, 20 (2), 1-12. Gray, D. E. (2014) Doing Research in the Real World, 3rd edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Howell, K.E. (2013) An Introduction to The Philosophy of Methodology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Kelm, J. B. (2011) What is Appreciative Inquiry [youtube video] at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwGNZ63hj5k (accessed: 3 August 2014) Kincheloe, J. L. and Berry, K. S. (2004) Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research: Conceptualizing the bricolage. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Khlentzos, D. (2011) Challenges to Metaphysical Realism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), (http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/realism-sem-challenge/) Online accessed 15 August 2014. Kincheloe, J. L. and Berry, K. S. (2004) Rigour and Complexity in Educational Research: Conceptualizing the bricolage. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966) The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lewin, K. (1946) Action research and minority problems, Journal of Social Issues, 2 (4), 34-36. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B. and Collins, K. M. T. (2009) Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3 (2), 114-139. Rescher, N. (2003) Epistemology: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. New York: State University New York. Schopenhaur, A. (1966) The World as Will and Representation Vols One and Two, trans. York: Dover Publications. Payne, E.F.J. New. Srivasta, S., Cooperrider, D. L. and Associates (1990) Appreciative Management and Leadership. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Townsend, A. (2013) Action Research: The Challenges of Understanding and Changing Practice. Berkshire: Open University Press. Whitney, D. and Trosten-Bloom, A. (2003) The Power of Appreciative Inquiry: A Practical Guide for Positive Change. San Fransisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Author Information

Shane Payne (presenting / submitting)
Leicester College
Technical & Education
Leicester

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.