From Social and Ethnic Origin to Educational Inequalities
Author(s):
Costel Grigoras (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 03 B, Roma: Research Methodologies

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
17:15-18:45
Room:
3002. [Main]
Chair:
Dana Moree

Contribution

In France, due to the Roma’s collective immigration ( Wolpert, 1968) methods including their extended families and their difficulties to access formal housing, the Roma generally live in informal habitats such as slums and squats. These segregated spaces, remote from urban areas and public transportation, are stricken by squalor and a general lack of squalor. This is evidently the main alleged reason for the removal policies the authorities implement, meaning evacuations and expulsions. Thus, the forced geographical mobility becomes a barrier to education, labour and formal habitat, hence, ultimately to integration and adaptation (Niessen & Huddleston, 2009) to the social spheres and structures of the immigration country (Massey, 1990) due to the marginalisation, discrimination and segregation (Murie & Musterd, 2004) it engenders. In 2013, less than half of the school aged Roma children were enrolled in academic institutions (about 2000 children according to RomEurope), generally stuck in the enrolment stage due to the local authorities discriminatory decisions to refuse schooling to Roma children. In this socio-geographical instability context in France, the Roma immigrant children’s education is problematic at best in term of the schooling process, but also due to the successive de-schooling and re-schooling phenomena (Esterle-Hendibel, 2006). Based on these observations, the issues to be studied are linked to the effects of this socio-geographical instability generated by the forced geographical mobility and the conditions of gross inequality on the Roma children’s academic trajectories in France. How do the social inequalities the Roma families face influence their children’s academic trajectories? Hence, this study highlights the way these social inequalities become academic inequalities and their long-term impact considering the endlessly repeated schooling - de-schooling - re-schooling process.

As a socialisation space and integration factor, the school contributes to the individual’s (Fabrizio & Neill, 2005) to the norms and values of the society. Also, through its functions, the school provides a basic cultural training (Oberg, 1960) and ensures the individual’s professional and social integration. Yet, the school represents a space of restrictions, control and surveillance. It demands not merely a cultural code to which the children must abide to (Boimare, 1999), but also a certain type of behaviour that leads to a certain lack of freedom (Fumat, 1997). Thus, the Roma children who are used to a lifestyle without any restrictions and rules imposed by their extended family, must adapt to the constraints and the tension such restrictions engender. Due to their unconventional behaviour, for example their posture during class and moving around for no apparent reason, speaking whenever they want, their difficulties with speaking and writing French, the Roma children become the victims of stigmatisation and marginalisation (Tarrius & Bernet, 2010). Consequently, their lack of attention during classes, their difficulties in understanding the teachings and imposition of the academic norms engender a conflict between the Roma child and the school system and environment. This leads to a connection between the social inequalities the Roma face and the academic inequalities the children face. The absence of adaptation to the academic structures reinforces the already existing conflicts between the Roma child and the school and increases the loss of social marks as a consequence of the loss of social ties. Thus, the difficulty to adapt to social change (Boudon & Cherkaoui, 2001) and the apparition of conflicts is strengthened be the reproduction of the same mechanism and the development of a vicious circle (Modoon, 2004) in which the Roma immigrant families in France find themselves.

Method

To obtain the data necessary to conduct this stud and to have the ability to follow the schooled Roma children and their families on the long-term, the most suitable method seemed to be a longitudinal ethnographic study by using a mixed approach. Firstly, qualitative data is mainly obtained via interviews with teachers who work in schools where Roma children are enrolled and via participant observation in schools and within the Roma families’ habitats. To support this qualitative data, a quantitative approach is carried out through questionnaires submitted to the Roma families who lived in Parisian slums and had children enrolled in schools at the beginning of this study. Hence, through the first approach, the causes and consequences of de-schooling, re-schooling and dropping (Janosz & Le Blanc, 1996) out can be determined. At the same time, this approach let us see the existing interactions between children and teachers at school, and the Roma children and other children attending classes there. Through the second approach, one can determine the causes endogenous to the ethnic group, but also to see the different types of unequal treatment (Van Zanten, 2001) the Roma face. Furthermore, an analysis of secondary data is carried out to determine and understand the extent of the Roma families forced geographical mobility and its impact on their access to formal habitat, education and employment. In terms of schooling, the analysis focuses on several criteria that seem pertinent: the parents’ level of schooling, the children’s preschool education (nursery or kindergarten in Romania), their past experiences with school environments in Romania or other countries, the child’s academic trajectory (repeating a year of studies) and seeing if the child has already dropped out and if he has afterwards been re-schooled. The research field is made up of 6 slums located in Parisian suburban areas, where over 300 individuals live and 40% of which are children. Five out of the six slums have already gone through several expulsion procedures and the children have been de-schooled and re-schooled on several occasions. As for their access to education and duration of studies, the study is carried out with 4 primary schools and one secondary school where 80 Roma children aged between 6 and 14 are enrolled and who represent out research cohort.

Expected Outcomes

The Roma children’s academic trajectories in France can be described by a late and faulty access to academic institutions, by a successive and repeated schooling – de-schooling – re-schooling mechanism which leads to the child’s inability to adapt to social structures. This fragmented academic trajectory prevents the Roma child from receiving an education sufficient in quality and quantity to give him access to higher education. It also prevents schools and teachers to adapt to the Roma children’s needs and reduce, and probably eradicate, all the constraints that lead to conflictual situations and increase their chances to adapt to the educational environment. The forced geographical mobility engendered by the removal policies implemented against an unwanted population of immigrants is one of the main reasons for the inequalities the Roma families have to face in France. This social inequality is due to the absence of a political will to integrate a population of economic immigrants who, in theory, benefit from all their rights as European citizens. Thus, in a context of social inequalities that translate into academic inequalities, the immigrant Roma children in France do not have a regular and sustainable education that could allow them a social and academic integration. The lack of a proper education leads to a lack of diplomas that give access to the labour market later on, thus restarting once again the vicious circle of the Roma ethnic group’s marginalisation, stigmatisation and discrimination.

References

Wolpert, J. (1968). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers of the Regional Science Association , 15, 159-169. Boimare, S. (1999). L'enfant et la peur d'apprendre. Paris: Dunod. Boudon, R., & Cherkaoui, M. (2001). Les changements de l'école accompagnent-ils les changements sociaux ? Paris: PUF. Cahn, C., & Guild, E. (2008). Recent Migration of Roma in Europe. OSCE. Charlemagne, J., & Reyniers, A. (1999). Les Roms : migrations et accueil. Migrations Société , 11 (63). CHDHR Romeurope. (2012). Les Roms, boucs-émissaires d’une politique sécuritaire qui cible les migrants et les pauvres. Dubar, C. (1992). La socialisation. Construction des indentités sociales et professionnelles. Paris: Armand Colin. Duru-Bellat, M. (1994). Filles et garçons à l'école : approche sociologique et psycho-sociales. revue Française de Pédagogie , 109-110, 111-141. Esterle-Hendibel, M. (2006). Absentéisme, déscolarisation, décrochage scolaire, les apports des recherches récentes. Déviance et Société , 30 (1), 41-65. Fabrizio, S. M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Cultural adaptation in outdoor programming. Australian Journal Of Outdoor Education. , 9 (2), 44-56. Ferte, P. (1989). La scolarisation des enfants tsiganes: pragmatisme et idéologie. In P. Williams, Tsiganes: identité, évolution (pp. 236-255). Paris: Syros. Fumat, Y. (1997). Contraintes, conflits, violence à l'école. Revue française de pédagogie. , 118, 61-70. Garnier, P. (2000). La socialisation en procès: conflits, enjeux, dynamiques. Ville école intégration (120), 9-17. Millet, M. (2005). Rupture scolaire? L'école à l'épreuve de la question sociale. Paris: PUF. Modoon, T. (2004). Capitals, Ethnic Identity and Education Qualifications. Cultural Trends , 13 (50), 87-105. Murie, A., & Musterd, S. (2004). Social Exclusion and Opportunity Structures in European Cities and Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies , 41 (8), 1441-1459. Oberg, K. (1960). Culture Shock & the Problem Of Adjustment To New Cultural Environments. . Practical Anthropologist 7 , 177-182. Palida, S. (2011). A Review of the Principal European Countries. In S. Palida, Racial criminalization of migrants in 21st Century. Farnham: Ashgate. Pourtois, J.-P., & Desmet, H. (1991). Quelques déterminants familiaux de la trajectoire scolaire et sociale. revue française de pédagogie , 96, 5-15. Sicot, F. (2007). Conflits de culture et déviance des jeunes de banlieue. Revue européenne des migrations internationales. , 23 (2), 29-56. Van Zanten, A. (2001). L'Ecole de la péripherie : Scolarité et ségrégation en banlieu. Paris: PUF.

Author Information

Costel Grigoras (presenting / submitting)
Paris-Sorbonne University
Sociology
Paris

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.