In teaching, there is always a moral dimension in meeting between pedagogue and child. This moral dimension is often implicit in teaching and therefore not so easy to visualize and discuss. Since the moral dimension influence all teaching and is crucial to teaching it need to be discussed, not least in teacher education.The study's aim is to examine and provide a better understanding of how student teachers express their ethical responsibilities and what these expressions say about professional ethics. The question is:
Professional ethics can be described on different levels and with different perspectives. According to Svensson (2011) professional ethics consist of three levels. The national level with different laws, the collegial level describing common principals and the personal level with the pedagogue´s own values. Different levels cannot really be separated but in this study, focus is on the personal ethics, expressed, or lived, in relationship between pedagogue and child.
Professional ethics is implied in practice, difficult to separate from other aspects of teaching and therefore difficult to view and discuss (Todd, 2001). This study is based on the conception that professional ethics is embedded in practice but does not need to be unspoken. It is crucial to teacher education to make professional ethics explicit, analyzed and criticized.
The pedagogue has a responsibility towards the children and this study is based on Levinas (1993) claim of responsibility as inevitable. The responsibility is always present in the meeting with children and must be handled by student teacher in one way or another. The meanings of professional ethics are studied through student teachers´ ways to experience, handle and develop this responsibility.
Challenges in teaching assignment consist of different ethical dilemmas. A dilemma does not have a right answer (Husu & Tirri, 2003) but depends on the judgment of the teacher in relation to the actual situation. Examples of challenges are conflicts between external frames and personal beliefs, disciplined children and democratic citizens and between public and personal values. This study is based on the understanding of dilemmas or conflicts as crucial to develop professional ethics (Colnerud, 1997).
Osguthorpe (2008) explains the difference between teaching ethics and teaching ethically. Teaching ethically means being a role model to children since your actions present different values. The teacher does not need to be virtuous. Campbell (2008) connects teaching ethically to the teacher as being virtuous. In this study, focus is on teaching ethically.
The lifeworld theory is used in this study. Intentionality and the natural attitude as parts of phenomenology and lifeworld theory are relevant. When student teachers make new experiences through teacher education, new understanding is built on the student teacher´s lifeworld. The lifeworld is the way that the student teacher relates to and interacts with the world. Intentionality is one´s directed awareness of objects or events (Husserl, 1995), meaning that when student teachers experience something, they experience it as something. A person´s lifeworld is the sum of all meanings and this lifeworld is impossible to escape but possible to reflect on (Husserl, 1995). The natural attitude, to take things for granted in order to cope with daily situations (Husserl, 1970), explains why ethics in teaching situations often remains unspoken. When something is natural and unquestioned, the experiences are implicit. When a student teacher meets children, the meeting is between different lifeworlds and the situation depends on what experiences both the children and the student teacher bring with them. Through reflection and self-awareness, objects and events experienced as natural attitude can become conscious and possible to study (Dahlberg, Dahlberg & Nyström, 2008).