Challenge and Change in Undergraduate Initial Teacher Education: Exploring the History of Education as a Space for Transition
Author(s):
Paul Flynn (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
15:15-16:45
Room:
208.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Peter Gray

Contribution

Recent reports have placed an emphasis on addressing the ‘Apprenticeship of Observation’ and integrating the foundational studies of education into Initial Teacher Education (ITE) curricula. (European Commission, 2014; Conway, 2009) As a concomitant focus, the transition of students into ITE and towards professionalism, particularly the experience of new entrants to tertiary education, is a priority for higher education institutions. (Department of Education and Skills,  2013) This paper will focus on a study of new entrants to an undergraduate ITE programme in the Republic of Ireland.

Engagement with history of education is a prerequisite for professional registration in the ROI. (Teaching Council of Ireland, 2009) Nationally and internationally however, engagement with this discipline in ITE has been in decline over recent decades . Pre-Service Teachers (PSTs) find the discipline difficult to reconcile to the practice of teaching as socio-economic demands undermine the necessity to understand the processes of education. (McCulloch, 2011) Over the same period an increased reliance on in-service teachers to demonstrate best practice has emerged. (Clarke et al, 2012; Darling-Hammond, 2006) This concomitant development is compounded by rapid advancements in mobile technologies which is outstripping the development of any technological self-efficacy (Mishra et al, 2009) returning teachers to what is tried, tested and stable. This study explores PSTs’ biographical relationship with the history of education aiming to challenge and change what is viewed as best practice, supported by educational technologies that ITE programmes across Europe are embedding in their curricula. (European Commission, 2014; OECD, 2011)

Inspired by social constructivist thinking, (Vygotsky, 1978) this research draws on the theory of ‘biograhicity’ (Alheit, 1999) and the role our tacit past plays in any intraspective examination, indicating that all historical experiences of education are explored as process that leaves neither the participant nor the learning environment and those in it, unchanged. (Alheit, 2009) Exploring past experiences establishes a platform from which to investigate the history of education, however the development of an intraspective process without intersubjective dialogue may limit any challenge to beliefs about best practice. Collaboration can act as an enabler by placing participants together in a highly scaffolded environment. (Stahl, 2004) Such an environment can facilitate challenge and change by sharing biographical experiences.

This study builds on Conway et al and the identification of a necessity to ‘promote reflective practice and inquiry to enhance knowledge integration’ .(Conway et al, 2009, p.xviii) Cochran-Smith and subsequently Munn, 2008, asserts that a researching practitioner should have the capacity to be dynamic, informed and informative ‘within the changing context in which they work’. (Cohran-Smith, 2003, p.24) Petty suggests that the learning experience of any practitioner should be founded on Kolb’s interpretation of experiential learning cycles (Petty, 2009) as part of ‘an integrated ITE curriculum that can support student teachers’ critical thinking, teaching and learning with relevant knowledge, understanding and research.’ (European Commission, 2014))

This study aims to develop a teaching and learning model to enable PSTs to explore their biographical relationship with education, collaboratively challenge preconceptions about the role of a teacher and look to their future with a holistic sense of the context within which they will work. This main objective is framed by the following research question and three core objectives:

How can enhanced engagement with the history of education help undergraduate pre-service teachers to challenge preconceptions about the teaching profession using educational technology?

  • Design an intervention that enhance engagement with the history of education
  • Develop a CSCL environment that facilitates collaborative engagement with the history of education, supported by educational technologies.
  • Establish a teaching and learning model that challenges PSTs preconceptions about the teaching profession.

Method

Methodology Key to answering the central research question is the establishment of an environment that can facilitate the real-world complexity and demands of professional educators. The development of a design that would facilitate an in-depth qualitative exploration of the central research question through the multiple interdependent variables transition, collaboration, engagement, narration and technologies was required. The history of education, as a non-elective modular component of ITE, was therefore viewed as a project based DBR intervention. (Brown, 1992; Collin, 1992; Barab & Squire, 2004) Ethical approval was sought for the project and subsequently granted by the host institution. The model was designed and administered by the researcher over a period of twelve weeks. Ethnographical data was supported by survey data, focus groups, a submitted artefact as part of assessment requirements and short, personal reflective essays. The triangulation of this qualitative data supported by nominal and ordinal quantitative data, was then analysed through the lens of the multiple interdependent variables and would inform subsequent iterations of the design model. (Barab, 2006) Selecting a sample that met the needs of the study facilitated a grouping of participants that would be engaged in similar activities on a daily basis over an extended period of time. The cohort of students identified as a purposive sample were new entrants to a four year duration Bachelors Degree in Mathematics and Education or what is known as a concurrent model of ITE. (n=21) All of the participants were engaged in tertiary education for the first time. This paper reports on the thematic and discourse analysis of the qualitative data from this project.

Expected Outcomes

Expected Outcomes Analysis of data indicated that undergraduate teachers are a community in transition experiencing the duality of student and preprofessional status. Participants believed that the history of education had a direct bearing on their future roles as educators and as a result of their participation they had developed self-efficacy in contemporary educational technologies. The collaborative nature of the intervention established clear variances in the participants historical experiences. Participants challenged their perception of teaching as an individual pursuit by engaging in an intraspective exploration of their histories of education. Exploring the history of tertiary level education and continuing professional development allowed participants to consider their position in education as tertiary level students and as pre-professionals. The intersubjective nature of collaboration and story sharing amongst participants facilitated a narrative description of their past experiences, present position and aspirations for the future by telling the stories of their colleagues experiences at similar points in their educational biographies. During this process participants engaged in a process of challenge and change that informed their discourse on the duality of being both a teacher and learner. Clear evidence emerged that such considerations were tacit prior to engagement with the design model and explicit thereafter. Participants indicated that technology is a central concern to new entrants to undergraduate ITE. The rapid advancements at tertiary level were not evident in their past experiences indicating to the researcher that the application of new technologies are directly linked to best practice that is considered tried, test and stable. This paper will conclude with a summary of the DBR intervention, observations about the future of the history of education and the potential of the application of this design model in the wider undergraduate community.

References

References Alheit, P. (2009) Biographical Learning - within the new lifelong learning discourse. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning (pp116-128). Routledge, London. Alheit, P. (1999) ON a Contradictory Way to the Learning Society: A Critical Approach. Studies in the Education of Adults, 31(1), 66-82. Barab, S. (2006) Design Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. In R.K. Sawer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Barab, S.A., & Squire, K. (2004) Design-based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. Brown, A. (1992) Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. Clarke, M., Lodge, A., & Shevlin, M. (2012) Evaluating Initial Teacher Edcuation Programmes: Perspectives from the Republic of Ireland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 141-153. Collins, A. (1992) Toward a Design Science of Education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology (pp.15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag. Conway, P.F., Murphy, R., Rath, A. & Hall, K. (2009) Learning to Teach and Its Implications fro the Continuum of Teacher Education: A Nine-Country Cross-National Study. Report Commissioned by the Teaching Council. University College Cork and Teaching Council of Ireland. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006) Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2): 1-15. Department of Education & Skills (2013) Supporting a Better Transition from Second Level to Higher Education: Key Directions and Next Steps. IE European Commission (2014) Initial Teacher Education in Europe: An Overview of Policy Issues. Brussels: EC Kerr, D., Mandzuk, D., & Raptis, H. (2011) The Role of the Social Foundations of Education in Programmes of Teacher Preparation in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(4), 118-134. McCulloch, G. (2011) The Struggle for the History of Education. Routledge, London Mishra, P., Koelher, J. & Kereluik, K. (2009) Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48-53. OECD (2011) ICT and Initial Teacher Education: National Policies. OECD Directorate for Education, Working Paper No.61. Stahl, G. (2004) Building Collaborative Knowing. What We Know About CSCL: Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Series, Vol. 3, pp53-85. Teaching Council of Ireland (2011) Initial Teacher Education: Strategy for the Review and Professional Accreditation of Existing Programmes. IE. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Phycological Processes. Cambridge University Press, London.

Author Information

Paul Flynn (presenting / submitting)
National University of Ireland - Galway
Galway

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.