Transition to Innovations in Education as Response to Civilizational Challenges: International Experience for Ukraine
Author(s):
Kateryna Hodlevska (presenting / submitting) Iryna Lytovchenko (presenting) Olena Ogiienko
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 10, Transition and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
11:00-12:30
Room:
334. [Main]
Chair:
Pauline Taylor

Contribution

The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss the methodological approaches and preliminary findings of a research project aiming to conceptualize and systematize the results of a comparative analysis of the current state of education in Great Britain, France, Germany, transformation of their education models in the context of innovative development of modern society. The task is to reveal the essence of the innovative education modeland outline ways of its implementation in Europe and Ukraine. The main questions raised in the research are why the transition to innovations in educationcan be an adequate response to civilizational challenges and whether the international experience of transition to the innovative education model is particularly useful in reforming the Ukrainian educational system.

The theoretical structure of the study comprises positions of philosophy of education (M. Apple, N. Burbules, A. Torres), education policies (J. Delors, D. Hill, A. Green, B. Levin), theory of education (Y. Cheng, J. Bruner, M. Fullan, J. Knight), as also documents of UNESCO, European Counsel, CEDEFOP, OECD.

Through the analysis of the theory and practice of education in theUK,France,GermanyandUkraine, the study focused on the following aspects:

- What are the factors of transition to innovative education?

- Do the state education policies ofGermany,France,Great BritainandUkrainecontain educational and political innovations?

- What are the differences between the traditional and innovative education models?

- What forms of innovative education are the most promising?

- Transition to innovative education model in Ukraine: implementation of European experience.

It has been found that significant changes take place at all levels of the educational systems ofGermany,Franceand theUK, including the education policy making level which defines the strategic priorities for further development of education. The methodology of vertical functional review allowed determining the differences and common features of education policies of these countries.Ukraine’s awareness of the need of transition to innovative education is expressed in Laws ofUkraine“On Innovative Activities”, the project “Education Innovation for Wellbeing Improvement and Poverty Reduction” which became catalysts of innovative changes in education.

The study of education paradigms and education models allowed us to determine the origins of innovations in education, find out the advantages and disadvantages of traditional and innovative education models. Comprehension of the nature of innovative education and expert survey results show that innovative education is focused on dynamic changes in the surroundings and encourages innovative changes in cultural and social environment, creates the conditions for the formation of an innovative person. According to experts, the transformation of the learning process should be aimed at transition from reproductive to creative learning, development of innovative curricula and learning technologies.

A promising way of attracting investments to the field of education is to create research universities and technology parks that strengthen the relationship between science and education. It has been found that three major strategies of creating research universities are used: breadth-strategy, depth-strategy, breadth-depth-strategy. European research universities prefer breadth-strategy. The number of universities has significantly grown since independence inUkraine.Ukraineis represented in the “QS World University Rankings 2013/14” by only four universities.

Technology parks are often based on universities and research centers. The distinctive feature of their functioning is social partnership between government, local authorities, private companies and universities. One of the reasons for decline of technology parks inUkraineis absence of government financial support.

The importance of the European experience of transition to the innovative education model as also possibilities and ways of its implementation in Ukraine in the process of joining the European educational space were defined.

Method

From a methodological point of view, the research was based on interdisciplinary and system approaches. Therefore, we used a complex of interrelated research methods: general scientific (comparative, structural, systemic-functional analysis, comparison and synthesis that are necessary to study scientific works, official regulations and empirical data) and empirical (conversation, dialogue, discussion, questionnaire, expert surveys, etc.) ones. The paper presents data collected through a set of research strategies: direct observation of the study process in higher education (lectures, workshops, students’ self-study); expert surveys of workers of Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (5), heads of higher education institutions (17), teachers (47), students (134), members of community-based organizations (14) and scientists (26) on the quality of education and ways of its improvement; analysis of educational programs, reports of training sessions, essays on “micro-pedagogies”; discussions and conferences. The study involves the conclusions of experts of the International Charitable Foundation “International Foundation for Education Policy Research”, the Center for Testing Technologies and Education Quality Monitoring, the Internet portal “Education Policy”, which made it possible to form a rather objective and systematic vision of the need and ways of transition to innovative education in Ukraine.

Expected Outcomes

The analysis of civilizational challenges, essence of innovative education, features of transition of European education systems to innovative education model and practical results of its implementation, allowed us to conclude that the transition to innovative education is an answer to the challenges of the rapidly changing modern society, a logically determined phenomenon of dynamic and evolutive nature. The transition to innovative education can solve the contradiction between the traditional system and the need for a totally new education that will ensure the full development of human abilities for self-education and self-development. The analysis of the educational systems of Germany, France and the UK has demonstrated that European countries today are still searching for mechanisms to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of their education, particularly through mechanisms of the development of pan-European education policy and the introduction of an innovative education model. The European experience of transition to innovative education reveals the priorities of transition to innovative education in Ukraine: the development of strategies for such transition with consideration of international experience; transition of state universities in Ukraine from traditional, non-evolving operation with tendencies of lagging behind the challenges of time to the developmental mode which provides training of competitive specialists; creation of research universities and technology parks providing close relationship between research and teaching; substantial transformations in all segments of the educational system: values, objectives, content, process and results of training and education, interaction between teachers and students, forms and methods of learning, educational environment, level of financial, technical, organizational, legal support of the educational process.

References

Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalization and the University: Myths and Realities in an Unequal World. Boston: Boston College. Bonaccorsi, A. & Dario, C. (2007). Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialisation and Performance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Bryan, C., Clegg, K. (2006). Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge. Earnest, J., Treagust, D. (2006). Education Reform in Societies in Transition: International Perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. Levittown: The Farmer Press. Gerasimov, E. & Gerasimova, E. (2012). Formation and Development of Innovative Learning Model in Terms of Sustainable Development of Economy. Journal of East European University of Economics and Management, 1(11), 11-21. (In Ukrainian) Green, A., Little, A., Kamat, S., Oketch, M. & Vickers, E. (2007). Education and Development in a Global Era: Strategies for Successful Globalisation. London: DfID. Honnef, B. (2008). Innovation in Education – Country Strategies. OECD/Germany Workshop on “Advancing Innovation: Human Resources, Education and Training”. Germany: OECD. Jain, L. (2000). Innovative Teaching and Learning: Knowledge-based Paradigms. Heidelberg; New York: Physica-Verlag. Kenway, J., Bigum, C., Fitzclarence, L., Collier, J. & Tregenza, K. (1994). New Education in New Times. Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 317–333. Larkley, J. & Maynhard, V. (2008). Innovation in Education. New York: Nova Science Publishers. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. London: Routledge. Martinez, M. & Wolverton, M. (2009). Innovative Strategy Making in Higher Education. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Moyle, K. (2010). Building Innovation: Learning with Technologies. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER. Mundy, K. (2005). Globalization and Educational Change: New Policy Worlds. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Eithwood & D. Ivingstone (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Policy (PP. 3-17). Ogienko, О. (2014). Theoretical Basis of Innovative Teacher Education. Journal of Modern Information Technologies and Innovative Teaching Methods in Professional Training: Methodology, Theory, Practice, Problems, 37, 147-151. (In Ukrainian) Sahlberg, P. (2009). Creativity and Innovation through Lifelong Learning. Journal of Lifelong Learning in Europe, 14(1), 53-60. Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. London & New York: Routledge.

Author Information

Kateryna Hodlevska (presenting / submitting)
Institute for Education Studies & Adult Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine
Department of Comparative Vocational Training
Kiev
Iryna Lytovchenko (presenting)
Institute for Education Studies & Adult Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine
Department of Comparative Vocational Training
Kiev
Institute for Education Studies & Adult Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine
Innovation Pedagogical of Technology
Kiev

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.