Mindfulness As Contemplative Inquiry In Teacher Education: A Case-Study Of Educating The “Teaching Self”
Author(s):
Oren Ergas (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
13:15-14:45
Room:
VII. Előadó [C]
Chair:
Maeve O'Brien

Contribution

Against the backdrop of an economically-driven educational ethos of high-stakes testing, academic achievements, accountability and performativity that seems to orient our teaching to comply with externals, an intimate and personal teaching orientation proposes that “we teach who we are” (Palmer, 1998, p. 1), and that “who I am in what I teach is the message” (Kelchtermans, 2009). This claim that can be located within the discourse of ‘teacher identity’ or ‘professional identity’ has been a focal interest for several scholars and teacher educators that have been both emphasizing its importance theoretically, and searching for meaningful ways by which to translate it into pedagogical practice (Bullough ,1997; Elbaz, 2001; Korthagen 2004; Tremmel, 1993).

If what we teach is (or flows directly form) ‘who we are’ then within their training and their on-going work teachers may benefit from directly engaging with the primary subject matter that teaching involves – the “self”. In Hamachek’s (1999) words this domain of the ‘teaching self’ is a ‘private curriculum’ and ‘‘the more that teachers know about themselves—the private curriculum within—the more their personal decisions are apt to be about how to pave the way for better teaching’’ (p. 209).

The current presentation follows this strand of teacher education, to examine the theoretical and practical potential of contemplative practices as pedagogies that work to ‘bring out’ (educare) the “teaching self”. The main question that this research examines is: How can mindfulness practice serve as a pedagogical approach for substantiating teacher’s commitment and search for meaning in the teaching profession? This orientation is nested within a burgeoning pedagogical approach in higher education involving a substantial rise in the incorporation of contemplative practice in higher education across disciplines (Barbezat & Bush, 2014; Lin, Oxford & Brantmeier, 2013). Setting aside extant research concerned with the ameliorating effects of mindfulness practice and other contemplative practices (Davidson et al, 2012), these recent publications reveal a substantial interest in the pedagogical applications of mindfulness, compassion meditation, yoga, tai chi, journaling and other practices referred to as contemplative.

This presentation describes a one-semester elective course offered at a European University in which teacher education students studied cross-cultural curriculum theories (Hattam, 2004; Lin, Oxford & Brantmeier, 2013)) and engaged in mindfulness practice conceptualized as both pedagogy and contemplative inquiry (Author, forthcoming; Zajonc, 2009) for two main purposes: 1. To engage directly with the question ‘who am I?’ and 2. To examine whether and how such introspective practice affects the way they view themselves as teachers. Mindfulness, the practice of “paying attention on purpose, in the present and non-judgmentally” (Kabat-Zinn, 1994, p. 4) was followed by journaling as a class and home practice. At the end of the course students handed in a 2000 word auto-ethnographical final project based on the practice and the journal. In this project they reflected on the above two foci, and on their semester’s journey of self-inquiry and professional identity.

The presentation will include two parts. In the first part of the presentation I will describe the rationale of incorporating contemplative practice in teacher education as part of the course’s rationale based on teacher education and contemplative education theories (Author, 2013, 2014; Barbezat & Bush, 2014; Zajonc, 2009). In the second part of the presentation results from a qualitative research in which I examine the potentials and difficulties involved in contemplative practice in teacher education will be discussed. Approximately 160 projects were collected from five cohorts of students that studied the above described course so far. The analysis will focus on a select number of final projects that will demonstrate students’ coping with this novel and challenging pedagogical approach.   

 

Method

The qualitative research that I am currently conducting treats the auto-ethnographical projects handed in at the end of one semester as its data. Students engage in a 15-minute home practice throughout the semester and in their final project, they are to examine whether this practice has changed the ways in which they think about themselves, on the profession of teaching and on the aims of education. A clear well-known limitation is involved in a research that is based on student projects when these projects are graded by the lecturer who conducts the research. To somewhat circumvent this issue, mindfulness is offered in the course as a method of inquiry. It serves to examine whether our ideas about ourselves and about teaching and education change as a consequence of this practice. As a lecturer, I stress that final projects that reflect authenticity will earn higher grades. I encourage students to reject mindfulness as an effective method if that is their authentic experience based on practicing and journaling throughout the semester. The methods applied for analysis of these projects stem from Strauss & Corbin (1990). I do not begin with open coding at this point but rather focus on specific themes that guide my selective coding based on the following questions: 1) What are the difficulties that students report about, as they practice in the class and at home? 2) Is there a development in students’ understanding of mindfulness practice throughout the semester? What is the nature of this development? 3) In what ways do students who already teach find that the practice affects their work? 4) In what ways does the practice affect their personal lives? 5) In what ways do students’ conception of “education” change as a consequence of the course? I read the projects searching specifically for the above themes, to find projects that reflect these foci most clearly. My search is based on a theoretical sensitivity that I have cultivated based on readings in the field of contemplative practice and its applications within education. Excerpts from select projects are then garnered, compared and categorized based on answers to the above questions. Based on the categorization and comparison I arrive at meta-themes and then work toward the development of a theory that depicts the potentials and difficulties involved in the application of mindfulness practice as a pedagogy for educating the “teaching self”.

Expected Outcomes

As mentioned, I have been teaching this course for a few years now to approximately 160 students. Based on reading these final projects, I find that there is a clear correlation between serious engagement in practice, a developing sense of meaning in students, and their deeper appreciation for what Korthagen (2004) refers to as the level of mission in teaching. Students report that mindfulness practice has allowed them to better understand their motivations in life, and has also mobilized some of their views on the scope of “education” and the idea of “pedagogy”. Witnessing the effects of mindfulness on their personal lives some students express the wish to incorporate this practice in their work in schools. At the same time, some students are less enthusiastic. Most find it quite hard to muster the self-discipline to practice at home. Once they do practice, they encounter well-known difficulties involved in the actual practice of meditation. These difficulties in some case translate into a reduced motivation to engage in further practice. Final projects that are based on little practice usually lack the depth and development found in projects reflecting students who seriously engaged in practice. Nevertheless, the former projects serve as a wonderful resource for deriving a theory of the difficulties involved in the implementation of such approach in teacher education. These are also great resources for my own reflection as I work to improve my own teaching. While this research is currently on-going, and I have not yet arrived at final conclusions, in accordance with similar approaches currently implemented in teacher education programs around the world, I find that mindfulness practice has a substantial pedagogical potential for teacher education, when skillfully implemented. Many students claim this course to be one of the most meaningful courses they had taken at the university level.

References

Author (2013) Author (2014) Author (forthcoming) Barbezat, D. & Bush, M. (2014). Contemplative practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Bullough, R. V. (1997). Practicing theory and theorizing practice in teacher education. In J. Loughran, & T. Russell (Eds.), Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 13–31). London/Washington, DC: Falmer Press. Elbaz, L. F. (2001). Understanding what goes on in the heart and the mind: learning about diversity and co-existence through storytelling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 133-146. Hamachek, D. (1999). Effective teachers: What they do, how they do it, and the importance of self-knowledge. In R. P. Lipka, & T. M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development (pp. 189–224). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994) Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion. Kelchtermans, Who I am in how I teach is the message: self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15 (2), 257-272. Korthagen, F.A.J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 20, 77-97. Lin, J., Oxford, R., Brantmeier, S. (eds.)(2013). Re-envisioning higher education. Charlotte: IAP. Palmer, P. (1998). The Courage to Teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Shapiro S. L., Brown K. W., Astin J. (2011) Toward the Integration of Meditation into Higher Education: A Review of Research Evidence. Teachers College Record 113 (3), 493–528. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J.. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Tremmel, R. (1993) Zen and the Art of Reflective Practice in Teacher Education, Harvard Educational Review,63(4), 434-459. Zajonc, A. (2009). Meditation as Contemplative Inquiry: When Knowing Becomes Love. Great Barrington: Lindisfarne Books.

Author Information

Oren Ergas (presenting / submitting)
Hebrew University
School of Education
Modi'in

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.