Factors Related to Parental Attitudes Toward Inclusion
Author(s):
Amalia Bjornsdottir (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 01 B, Family Decision-Making, Funding, and School Choice

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
13:15-14:45
Room:
206.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Jo Rose

Contribution

As in many European countries, it has been recognised in Iceland that mainstream (i.e., neighbourhood) schools should be the first choice for students with special educational needs. Iceland’s Compulsory School Act (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 2008) stipulates that all students should receive 10 years of compulsory schooling by attending mainstream schools. This policy is in accordance with international perspectives holding that sending some children to special schools labels them and prevents their equal access to social and educational opportunities (United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, 2009; UNESCO, 1994).

 

Though arguably clear, the legislation continues to be debated in Iceland. Bjarnason (2009) pointed out that the movement for educating all students in neighbourhood schools is by no means universally praised by parents and teachers. Björnsdóttir and Jónsdóttir (2014) reported that only half of teachers consider it important that all children attend their neighbourhood school. This poll result is especially alarming since teacher beliefs and teaching self-efficacy regarding children with special needs are primary means to develop effective teaching practice (MacFarlane & Woolfson, 2013).

 

Yet, negative attitudes toward inclusion do not constitute a phenomenon unique to Iceland. In a review of primary schoolteachers’ attitudes toward inclusion in several countries, de Boer, Pijl, and Minnaert (2011) concluded that teachers seem to be either negative or undecided toward inclusive education. Though teachers tend to be quite positive about the idea, they have concerns about its practicality (Avramidis & Norwich, 2002). Such negative and neutral attitudes are also alarming, since teachers and their beliefs influence the effectiveness of their teaching practice (Curcic, 2009).

 

As the emphasis on including all children in Iceland’s mainstream schools has increased, possibilities for parents to influence schools have also grown. In fact, each of Iceland’s compulsory schools is required to have a school council with two parent representatives (Menntamálaráðuneytið, 2008). Parental participation in these school councils is vital, for among their many responsibilities the councils participate in policymaking by discussing curricular guidelines and debating all proposed plans for major changes to school operations and activities.

 

It is therefore concerning that only a third of Iceland’s parents consider it very important that all children in Iceland attend their neighbourhood schools (Björnsdóttir & Jónsdóttir, 2014). In recent years, there has also been pressure to raise educational standards (Norwich, 2009), which has encouraged some parents to believe, rightly or wrongly, that universal neighbourhood school attendance and improved academic standards cannot be achieved at the same time. Such thinking might in turn influence attitudes toward inclusion and make parents less likely to push for the effective inclusion of all children in neighbourhood schools. Parents with more capital and capacity, with experiences of success in school, and who highly value education tend to be better equipped to tackle home–school relationships (Dannesboe et al., 2012) which makes them important allies in promoting all-inclusive practices.

 

The attitudes of parents who have children with special needs might differ from those of parents in general they might be more positive. Elkins, Van Kraayenoord, and Jobling (2003) concluded that parents favoured inclusion when their children were supported well at school.

 

In this paper, I will investigate which factors of parents’ and children’s backgrounds influence their attitudes toward inclusion using data from the project Teaching and Learning in Icelandic Schools.

Method

Participants: Participants were parents of students in 20 of Iceland’s compulsory schools in four municipalities. Of the 20 schools, 17 were selected via stratified random sampling, while the other three were selected for their emphasis on individualized learning. The sample was large; the students in these 20 schools comprised 17% of all students in compulsory schools in Iceland. The response rate (67%) for parents (n = 3,481) was good, given that survey response rates frequently fall below 50% (Saunders, 2012). Materials: The research team used an online questionnaire developed using QuestionPro by following Karlsson’s (2003) and Þórsdóttir and Jónsson’s (2007) guidelines for survey construction. The questionnaire included questions about the parent’s background, his or her children’s special needs, and personal attitudes toward schools with special emphasis on the development of cooperative learning and inclusive education. The questionnaire was reviewed by an expert in survey construction and pretested in a pilot study in one compulsory school. Procedure: An online questionnaire was sent to each parent in April 2011 using email addresses accessible from school computer files. If two email addresses were on file for both the mother and father, for example, one address was selected randomly. If a parent had more than one child at the school, then the child for whom the parent would answer was selected randomly. To follow up, emails were resent to parents who did not respond, and school principals also sent letters to parents to encourage participation. If the parent did not reply and another email for the household was on file, the questionnaire was sent to that email address, with two follow-up emails further encouraging participation. Data were analysed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 using binary logistic regression, chi-square, and descriptive statistics. Key variables: The key variable in this data analysis was the parent’s rating on a five-point Likert type scale of the importance of all children’s attending their neighbourhood schools regardless of disability, health, and origin. This question was thought to measure attitudes toward inclusion, and analysis focused on finding variables at the personal level (e.g., parent’s education and student’s special needs) that could predict the answer.

Expected Outcomes

When asked how important they considered all children’s attending their neighbourhood schools in Iceland, 37% of parents said it was very important, while another 28% said it was rather important. Education influenced parents’ answers. Parents with less formal education were more likely to agree with the statement that all children should attend their neighbourhood schools, though 52% of parents with basic education and 28% of parents with university education said it was very important (p < . 001). Parents who reported that their children had behavioural problems were more likely (43%) than parents who reported that their children did not (35%) to say that it was very important for all children to attend their neighbourhood school in Iceland (p = .025). Similar results were found for parents who said that their child had learning disabilities. However, no difference was found among answers of parents of children with physical and/or developmental disorders and those of parents without such children. Half of parents said they were completely or very happy with the school that their child attended. Of those parents, 39% said that they strongly agree with the statement that all children should attend neighbourhood schools, compared to 35% of parents who were less happy with the school (p = .008). Parents who said that their children’s schoolwork was too easy were less likely (30%) to say that it was very important for all children to attend their neighbourhood school (p = .001) than parents who said that their children’s schoolwork was too difficult (42%). In conclusion, parents with more education and children who do well in school are less likely to think that all children in Iceland should attend their neighbourhood school. These results are alarming since this group of parents tends to more significantly influence their children’s school.

References

Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers' attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129-147. Bjarnason, D. (2009). Through the Maze: What is (special-) education in inclusive settings? Retrieved from: Vefir. hi. is. Björnsdóttir, A. & Jónsdóttir, K. (2014). Viðhorf foreldra, nemenda og starfsmanna skóla. In (G.G. Óskarsdóttir ed.), Starfshættir í grunnskólum við upphaf 21. aldar (p. 29-56). Reykjavik: Haskolautgafan. Curcic, S. (2009). Inclusion in PK-12: an international perspective. [Article]. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(5), 517-538. de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331-353. Elkins, J., Van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Jobling, A. (2003). Parents’ attitudes to inclusion of their children with special needs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3(2), 122-129. Karlsson, Þ. (2003). Spurningakannanir: uppbygging, orðalag og hættur. In S. Halldórsdóttir, & K. Kristjánsson (eds.) Handbók í aðferðafræði og rannsóknum í heilbrigðisvísindum (p. 331-335). Akureyri: Háskólinn á Akureyri. MacFarlane, K., & Woolfson, L. M. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusifon of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and teacher education, 29, 46-52. Menntamálaráðuneytið (2008). The Compulsory School Act. 2008. Iceland. Available: http://eng.menntamalaraduneyti.is/Acts. Norwich, B. (2009). Dilemmas of difference and the identification of special educational needs/disability: international perspectives. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 447-467. UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child (2009). UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child 2009. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577. UNESCO (1994). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO: New York. Þórsdóttir, F. & Jónsson, F., H. (2007). Gildun á mælistikum. In G. Ó. Jóhannesson (ed.) Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum VIII (p. 527-536). Reykjavík: Félagsvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands.

Author Information

Amalia Bjornsdottir (presenting / submitting)
University of Iceland, Iceland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.