Assessing National and Supranational Identities in 8th Grade. A Study on Multiple Identities Perceptions in Italy.
Author(s):
Valeria Damiani (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 12 B, Assessing Citizenship and Cosmopolitanism

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-11
09:00-10:30
Room:
328. [Main]
Chair:
Julian Fraillon

Contribution

Due to the effects of globalization that affect different aspects of modern societies, the concept of identity is currently subject to an attempt of a deep re-elaboration. The huge flows of migrants from the less developed parts of the globe to rich countries are increasing the multiculturalism of contemporary societies and are raising questions concerning not only legal and civil issues but also social and cultural matters (Ross, 2007).

In the light of the new global phenomena, an extensive debate have been developing about the inventory and the reciprocal relationship of multiple identities in the individuals, within the theoretical framework of the social identity theory  (Tajfel, 1978; Tajfel and Turner, 1979, 1986). The common theoretical basis of this debate is related to a specific concept of identity, which is not intended as a transcendent entity prior to social reality, but it is a modality of understanding of the self and of the different communities we live in. In this perspective, individuals do not possess a single identity, but an inventory of multiple identities, characterized by different degrees of tension between them. They are distinct but often do not have well-defined boundaries and rarely eliminate each other (Delanty & Rumford , 2005).

Multiple identities are contingent: the individual can use one or a combination of them, randomly and unpredictably, depending on the place, on the people and on the circumstances in which the communication takes place. Based on these assumptions, the identities are then built and not given a priori, they are liquid and multiple, and none of them can be considered as the only category of the individual (Hall, 1996; Bauman, 2001, 2004).

Within this debate, growing interest has been focused on the degrees of membership to different political and cultural communities (understood in terms of “state” and “nation”) from the local to the national and supranational level, including also the so called “world community”.

Some large-scale surveys such as IEA-ICCS (2009 ) or the Standard Eurobarometer 81, carried out for the European Commission in May 2014, have already addressed these issues, examining the degrees of individuals’ belonging to different communities. These research, however, do not provide an in depth analysis on the characteristics and behaviors that are deemed to be specific of the national and supranational identity – i.e. they do not deal with the question: what does it mean “to be Italian” or “to be European” for the respondents?

On the other hand, the research that have examined this matter in detail, have posed these questions to target groups made up of university students or adults (Bruter ,2004; Risse, 2004; Citrin e Sides, 2004; Lutz et al., 2006; Jamieson, 2007; Pichler, 2008).

The present contribution is part of my PhD dissertation and it is focused on two objectives:

1) assessing students’ multiple identities related to the different degrees of belonging to the local, regional, national, European and global community (in terms of a "single world society");

2) identifying the elements at the core of three types of identity: the Italian, the European and the world citizen identity, i.e. identifying those characteristics or behaviors that are considered peculiar of being Italian, European and a world citizen by the students.

 The target group of the present study is composed of Italian 8th grade students (in consistency with the IEA-CIVED (1999) and ICCS (2009) international surveys, which represent the studies at the core of this work).

This contribution provides also a focus on the operationalization into variables of the constructs related to “being Italian”, “being European” and “being a world citizen”, highlighting the current debate on these matters.

Method

In order to achieve these objectives, a questionnaire has been developed. The first draft of the questionnaire has been piloted on 111 8th grade students. Two focus groups, made up of some students who had participated in the piloting, were then carried out in order to analyze questions’ comprehensibility and adequacy for the target group, in terms of knowledge and cultural collective unconscious. In order to identify possible scales, an exploratory factor analysis has been conducted to examine if the questions could entail one or more possible underlying factors. Then the item-total correlation and Cronbach’s alpha have been calculated. According to the analysis of the focus group and of the data of the pilot, the questionnaire has been then revised. The final version is composed by 25 close-ended questions included into 6 sections. Two of them are related to students’ trust in political institutions and their interest in politics (section 5) and to students’ background (section 6). The present contribution is however focused on the other 4 sections i.e.: 1) the section concerning students’ attitudes towards Italy, the characteristics of the “good citizen” and of “being Italian”; 2) the section about students’ attitudes towards the European Union and the characteristics of “being European”; 3) the section concerning students’ attitudes towards the global community and the characteristics of “being a world citizen”; 4) the section about students’ multiple identities perception. Released items from IEA international surveys on civic and citizenship education (i.e. CIVED, 1999 and ICCS, 2009) have been used to develop some questions in section 1, 2 and 5. The revised questionnaire has been finally administered to a judgment sample of 329 8th grade students in Rome and its region.

Expected Outcomes

Through Cronbach’s alpha analysis, scales have been identified: the “good citizen” behavior, two subscales (α=.65), (α=.73), derived from CIVED (1999) the characteristics of “being Italian”, two subscales (α=. 74), (α=.79) the characteristics of “being European”, one scale (α=.78) the characteristics of “being a world citizen”, one scale (α=.68) students’ multiple identities perception, one scale (α=.75) Students showed to possess multiple identities perception. In detail they have expressed a deep belonging to the family, the city and the country they live in – i.e. to those dimensions that were closer and familiar to them. Respondents identified as characteristics of “being Italian” the elements linked to culture (for example visiting museums, reading books) while they have considered as irrelevant the aspects related to popular stereotypes (sunbathing, having breakfast at the bar with cappuccino). In relation to the peculiar elements of “being European”, the scale includes aspects related to the social dimension (such as the protection of the most vulnerable groups). For what concerns being a world citizen, the only scale that has been identified is mainly focused on cosmopolitan elements (respecting different cultures) and it overlaps with some aspects of “being European”. It is necessary to stress, though, that the answers to these questions were substantially uniform. The students, in fact, were asked to reflect on the meaning of “being Italian” and above all of “being European” and “a world citizen” for the first time while answering this questionnaire. Unfamiliarity with those topics and also social desirability may have thus influenced their answers. Finally this research raises some questions on the possibility to integrate the questionnaire to other qualitative instruments and techniques in order to investigate more in depth students’ different opinions and feelings in relation to the subjective topic of multiple identities perception.

References

Bauman, Z. (2001). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bruter, M. (2004). Civic and cultural components of a European identity: A pilot model of measurement of citizens’ levels of European identity. In Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., Brewer, B. M. (eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 186-213). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield publishers inc. Citrin, J., & Sides, J. (2004). More than nationals: How identity choice matters in the new Europe. In Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., Brewer, B. M. (eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 161-185). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield publishers inc. Delanty, G. & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe. Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge. Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: who needs identity? In Hall, S., du Gay, P. (eds.), Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage. Jamieson, L. (2007). European Identities: From Absent-Minded Citizens to Passionate Europeans. Sociology, 41, 633-680. Lutz, W., Kritzinger, S. and Skirbekk, V. (2006). The demography of growing European identity. Science, 314 (5798), 425. Pichler, F. (2008). European identities form below: meanings of identification with Europe. Prospectives on European Politics and Society, 9 (4), 411-430. Risse, T. (2004). European institutions and identity change: what have we learned? In Herrmann, R. K., Risse, T., Brewer, B. M. (eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 247-271). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield publishers inc. Ross, A. (2007). Multiple identities and education for active citizenship. British journal of educational studies, vol. 55, n. 3, pp. 286-303. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement among Lower-Secondary School Students in 38 Countries. Amsterdam: IEA. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviuor. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries. Civic knowledge and engagement at the age of fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.

Author Information

Valeria Damiani (presenting / submitting)
Roma Tre University
Department of education
Rome

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.