Session Information
18 SES 05, Physical Education Teacher Education: Challenges and Future
Paper Session
Contribution
Time after time Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) and Health and Physical Education (HPE) are identified as learning areas where the ‘power of tradition’ remain strong. The history of and transition within PETE and HPE has neither been struggle- nor problem-free. Neither the reformation of PETE nor the shift in the HPE curriculum appears to be able to challenge the teacher student’ understandings [1]. Instead, certain beliefs, norms and values continue to be reproduced in PETE regardless of the criticisms offered. By everyone accepting ‘the rules of the game’ [2], they cannot reflect on, challenge, argue in favour of, or fight over the logic of the dominant practice or what types of knowledge that are seen as important and therefore have its legitimate place in the PETE programme. Within PETE there exists taken for granted assumptions that reflect its history, content, structure, the type of student who enrolls and the outcome for the students at the end of the programme [3].
Although one of the goals of most contemporary PETE programmes is to develop the students’ ability to adopt critical approaches and perspectives, several scholars argue that a completely new university programme is needed if future HPE teachers are going to develop socially-critical approaches [4].
Aim & Research Questions
Based on the discussion above it is of research significance to examine the beliefs about what kind of competencies future HPE teachers need to develop throughout their degree. The purpose of this study was to explore what kind of beliefs about HPE teachers’ competencies that are expressed, assessed, reinforced or challenged throughout the degree. The focus of analysis is particularly on what beliefs about the structure and content of PETE are in tension with each other.
Research questions:
- What teacher competencies are seen as important to develop throughout the degree by the teacher students?
- What competencies are being assessed in PETE assessments?
- What beliefs about HPE teachers’ competencies are reinforced or challenged in and through these assessments?
Theoretical frame
To understand what the possibilities/constraints are for a challenging and critically reflective learning to occur within HPETE we draw on the theories and concepts of Pierre Bourdieu [4]. Bourdieu uses the concept of social fields to explain how, within a specific social context, there is a logic and rules about the practice [5]. These rules are the result of the historical struggles within the field and have shaped prevailing beliefs, or the ‘doxa’, that everyone in the field are aware of. Doxa represents the collective beliefs, norms and attitudes about the ideal or ‘right’ practice and if these are not questioned and challenged continues both to guide and limit what is possible and not possible.
Our point of departure is that PETE can be seen as an encounter between individuals from different backgrounds and with various experiences and the objective structures of an education programme. An education programme’s objective structures contain notions, values, norms and practices that constitute what is deemed relevant and valuable knowledge [6] Participants are individuals, but at the same time they find themselves in a context involving a number of socially constructed rules and notions about what is possible and right, as well as the opposite, i.e. what is inconceivable. Although PETE is not a social field, strictly speaking, in accordance with Bourdieu's definition, the taken for granted assumptions about what constitute a ‘competent’ teacher of HPE still represent a form of doxa. What is considered to be the ‘right’ practice, and valued forms of knowledge is also reflected in what is being assessed.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press Bourdieu, Pierre (1992). Texter om de intellektuella, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings bokförlag Brown, David (2005). An economy of gendered practices? Learning to teach physical education from the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu’s embodied sociology. Sport, Education and Society 10. Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage Publ.. Dowling, Fiona (2008). Getting in touch with our feelings: the emotional geographies of gender relations in Physical Education Teacher, Education. Sport, Education & Society 3. Dowling, Fiona & Kårhus, Svein (2011). An analysis of the ideological work of the discourse of ‘fair play’ and moral education in perpetuating inequitable gender practices in PETE. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 2. Kirk, David, MacDonald, Doune & O’Sullivan, Mary (eds.) (2006). The Handbook of Physical Education. London: Sage Publications. Kirk, David (2010). Physical Education Futures. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Larsson, Lena (2009). Idrott- och helst lite mer idrott. Idrottslärarsudenters möte med utbildningen. Diss. Stockholm university. [Sport – and preferably a little more sport. P. E. students' encounter with the education.] MacDonald, Doune, Hunter, Lisa, Carlson, Teresa & Penney, Dawn (2002). Teacher Knowledge and the Disjunction between School Curricula and Teacher Education. Asia- Pasific Journal of Teacher Education 30. Matanin, Marcia & Collier, Connie (2003). Longitudinal Analysis of Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 22. Moen, Kjersti, M. (2011). “Shaking or stirring?” A case-study of physical education teacher education in Norway. Diss. Oslo: Norges idrettshøgskole. Rossi, Tony, Sirna, Karen & Tinning, Richard (2008). Becoming a health and physical education (HPE) teacher: Student teacher ‘Performances’ in the physical education subject department office. Teacher and Teaching Education 24. Tinning, Richard (2004). Rethinking the preparation of HPE teachers: ruminations on knowledge, identity, and ways of thinking, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 32, nr. 3. Tinning, Richard (2012). A socially critical HPE (aka physical education) and the challenge for teacher education. In: Barry Down and John Smyth (eds.) Critical voices in teacher education: teaching for social justice in conservative times. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.