Session Information
16 SES 03 B, Enhancing Competences and Self-Regulation
Paper Session
Contribution
Research on teacher education pointed out the importance of developing teachers' reflective skills for their professional development (Freese, 1999; Hoffman-Kipp, Artiles, & López-Torres, 2003). Reflection is described as a process of dynamic action and learning that enables teachers to develop their practice in the light of their analysis and evaluation (Parson & Stephenson, 2005). In this respect, metacognitive awareness is considered to be a critical element in promoting reflection among teachers (Zohar & Barzilai, 2013). In addition, given their potential contribution to reflection, the findings from past studies suggested using web-based portfolios in teacher education for promoting teachers' reflective skills (e.g., Borko et al., 1997). Thus, in the current study, a customized web-based portfolio system, namely the BOUNCE system, was utilized to promote reflection. The BOUNCE System included the blend of both technological (BOUNCE web-based portfolio software) and pedagogical (BOUNCE model) components. The BOUNCE web-based portfolio software provided a platform both for preservice teachers to upload their portfolio artifacts and for course instructors to follow-up their students’ work. The BOUNCE model was grounded in two premises: One involved the three processes of effective portfolio development such as identifying teaching goals, collecting evidence to connect goals with practice, and the owners’ critical reflections to become aware of their actions and thoughts (Wolf, 1994). The second one has to do with the three aspects of “teacher's life space,” namely goals, experiences, and observations (Fuller & Bown, 1975). The BOUNCE model task cycle was designed in a way to offer the participants opportunity for noticing and reducing the discrepancies among these three aspects of their life space.
This study primarily examined how the degree of preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness influences their reflections on their teaching practicum experiences as they construct their portfolios with the BOUNCE System. More specifically, the goal was to first describe the nature and frequency of reflective indicators (Oner & Adadan, 2011) of teaching practicum experiences exhibited by the groups of preservice teachers with a high level of metacognitive awareness (MA) and a low level of MA. The subsequent goal was to find out the relationship between the preservice teachers' high-level reflective indicators and their MA. The following research questions guided the study:
(RQ1) What is the nature and frequency of reflective indicators of teaching practicum experiences exhibited by the groups of preservice teachers with a high level of MA and a low level of MA?
(RQ2) How do the groups of preservice teachers with a high level of MA and a low level of MA compare in terms of their high and low levels of reflective indicators of teaching practicum experiences?
(RQ3) What is the relationship between the preservice teachers' high level of reflective indicators of teaching practicum experiences and their MA?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Borko, H., Michalec, P., Timmons, M., & Siddle, J. (1997). Student teaching portfolios: A tool for promoting reflective practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 345-357. Freese, A. R. (1999). The role of reflection on preservice teachers’ development in the context of a professional development school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 895-909. Fuller, F. F., & Bown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education, 74thyearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 25-52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hoffman-Kipp, P., Artiles, A. J., & López-Torres, L. (2003). Beyond reflection: Teacher learning as praxis. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 248-254. Johnson R. B., & Onwuegbuzie A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. Oner, D., & Adadan, E. (2011). Use of web-based portfolios as tools for reflection in preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 477-492. Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 95-116. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-470. Wolf, K. (1994). Teaching portfolios: Capturing the complexity of teaching. In L. Ingravrson & R. Chadbourne (Eds.), Valuing teachers’ work: New directions in teacher appraisal (pp. 112-136). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.