Session Information
04 SES 07 B, Paths, Transitions and Agency
Paper Session
Contribution
Abstract
Until recently in Ireland as in many other European countries, the educational provision for blind/vision impaired young people occurred primarily within a segregated special educational system. The restructuring of the education system began in the 1990s leading to significant changes in special education including a language of inclusive education within policy initiatives. Ireland has witnessed significant changes in how we think about and respond to disability as a public issue. In the past blind/vision impaired children and young people were generally assigned to particular types of education based on their impairment category. This type of provision led to groundless conjectures about the learning capabilities of this section of the population and implied that as a result of their impairment they inevitably had more distinctive learning needs than their peers (Griffin & Shevlin, 2007). Changes in policy, practice and provision means that increasingly blind/vision impaired children and young people have the opportunity to be educated within mainstream settings. It is recognised that the challenge for the education system is to adapt to the needs of children and young people with disabilities and, to accept their differences, while enabling them to realise their potential (Watson & Nolan, 2011). These developments have been influenced by “...international demands for a more equitable education system that recognises diversity and considers how schools might address the needs of pupils who have been previously marginalised” (Rose, Shevlin, Winter, & O’Raw, 2010, p. 359). There has been a history of exclusion and missed opportunities among blind/vision impaired people within education and employment. Research has identified a positive association between education and employment (Shah, & Priestley 2011, Gannon & Nolan, 2005). AHEAD (2008) acknowledge that without actual equality of access to educational opportunities and qualifications, we are in danger of losing accomplished individuals from the labour force. While it is recognised that the numbers of students with disabilities within third level education has increased in recent decades the numbers of blind/vision impaired students within this sector remains persistently low (AHEAD, 2008). Current EU policy places significant importance on inclusion and participation for people with disabilities and recognises “how structural barriers within society can marginalise people with disabilities.” (Smyth, 2014 p. 436). This paper explores factors that influence how transitions are experienced by blind/vision impaired people. Significant transitions tend to occur in adolescence and early adulthood as the individual moves between schools and from school to further education and employment. A variety of factors impacted on the transition experiences of participants in this study (McCarthy, 2013). “Policy and practice, particularly within the school arena, can either support young people’s subjective realities or constrain them.” (Shah, 2005, p. 112). Decisions taken at secondary school regarding subjects pursued, the level at which these subjects are undertaken, which Leaving Certificate programme to pursue and the quality and extent of career guidance can all have significant implications (McCarthy, 2015, 2013). This is pertinent in relation to what pathways are open to people once they leave school. While it was evident that greater transition opportunities are now available to blind/vision impaired people, it is apparent that transitions can be thwarted through disabling environments and disabling attitudes (ibid). It is necessary therefore to ensure that policy development and practice always enables rather than disables transition opportunities for blind/vision impaired people. It is anticipated that the findings from this research could be used to provide an understanding of the impact of existing policy and practice on the transition choices/opportunities of blind/vision impaired people and to inform the development of future policy and practice.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ali, Z., Fazil, Q., Bywaters, P., Wallace, L., & Singh, G. (2001). Disability, ethnicity and childhood: a critical review of research. Disability & Society, 16(7), 949-967. Association for Higher Education Access and Disability. (2008). Seeing ahead: A study of factors affecting blind & vision impaired students going on to higher education. Dublin: AHEAD Education Press. Educable, Save the Children Fund (Great Britain), & Disability Action. (2000). No choice: no chance. Belfast: Save the Children. Gannon, B., & Nolan, B. (2005). Disability and social inclusion in Ireland. Dublin: National Disability Authority and The Equality Authority. Griffin, S., & Shevlin, M. (2007). Responding to special educational needs : an Irish perspective. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. McCarthy, P. (2013) Expectations You Encounter: The Educational Experiences and Transition Choices/Opportunities of Blind/Vision Impaired People in the Republic of Ireland. PhD thesis: Trinity College Dublin (Unpublished). McCarthy, P. (2015) ’The Importance of Effective Access to the Curriculum for Transition Opportunities among Vision Impaired Pupils’ The AHEAD Journal A Review of Inclusive Education & Employment Practices. Issue 1 pp 33-45 Dublin: AHEAD Education Press. National Disability Authority (Ireland). (2002). Guidelines for including people with disabilities in research. Dublin: National Disability Authority. Priestley, M. (2003). Disability: A Life Course Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press. Rose, R., Shevlin, M., Winter, E., & O’Raw, P. (2010). Special and inclusive education in the Republic of Ireland: reviewing the literature from 2000 to 2009. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(4), 359-373. Segert, A., & Zierke, I. (2000). The metamorphosis of habitus among East Germans. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge. Shah, S. (2005) Voices and choices: how education influences the career choices of young disabled people Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 5(3) 112–117 Shah, S., & Priestley, M. (2011). Disability and social change : private lives and public policies. Bristol: Policy Press. Smyth, F., Shevlin, M., Buchner, T., Biewer, G., Flynn, P., Latimier, C., ... & Ferreira, M. A. (2014). Inclusive education in progress: policy evolution in four European countries. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(4), 433-445. Watson, D., & Nolan, B. (2011). A Social Portrait of People with Disabilities in Ireland. Dublin: Department of Social Protection and ESRI.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.