Contributions to the Assessment Field from Gymnastic Skills Teaching-Learning: Case Studies
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Poster

Session Information

18 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2015-09-09
12:30-14:00
Room:
Poster Area
Chair:
Leen Haerens

Contribution

Based on the Bologna Process guidelines, current educational models lay stress on competence-based learning. This process is characterised, amongst other things, by developing a more autonomous type of student work, as well as by an increased use of information and communication technologies (ICTs). Seeking to achieve that aim, university lecturers are looking for more collaborative and participatory teaching-learning systems, where the student has a main role. In this respect, students must make decisions during the teaching-learning process about what, how, how much and when to learn; in other words, students should be able to regulate their motivation towards this process by themselves.

In the specific field of Physical Activity and Sport, numerous authors have defended the theories in which students take advantage of collaborative methodologies to develop more autonomous behaviours and communication skills (Fernández-Río, 2006; Fraile, 2006; Grineski, 1996; Hargreaves, 2005; Johnson, 2004; Slavin, 1990; Vernetta, Gutiérrez-Sánchez, López-Bedoya & Ariza, 2013). As for gymnastic and acrobatic skills, both collaborative strategies and the utilisation of learning recording tools (observation sheets, self-assessment and co-assessment cards…) will most probably help students obtain more significant learning, with greater responsibility too, as has already been shown in a wide variety of studies (Dyson, Griffin & Hastie, 2004; Vernetta, López-Bedoya & Delgado, 2009; Vernetta, López-Bedoya & Robles, 2009). Furthermore, the recording instruments (video cameras, mobile telephones…) that students use as tools to observe and assess their own learning may favour self-regulating behaviours in their training (Azevedo, Guthrie & Seibert, 2004; Wilson, 1997).

Assessment is also an aspect within the teaching-learning process about which the teaching staff are concerned, and which has been the study object of many works in the Physical Education field (Delgado, 1991; Hernández, Velázquez, Alonso & Castejón, 2004; López et al., 2007; Mosston & Ashworth 1993). In tune with participatory methodologies, it is our conviction that the assessing process must also be oriented towards more highly formative and collaborative assessment systems which can help achieve a more autonomous type of learning by university students. Self-assessment and co-assessment (inter-group assessment) have been suggested in various studies not only as means that encourage students to become directly involved in the perception of their educational evolution but also as systems contributing to reach a higher degree of development, both in social terms and as far as autonomy and responsibility are concerned (Fraile, 2006; López et al., 2007; Slavin, 1990; Vernetta et al., 2013).

The lack of autonomy in our university students’ learning, reflected and not obtained with the use of conventional learning situations leads us to think about the possibility of enhancing our teaching through the incorporation of more participatory and cooperative methods based on technological instruments that could reinforce the learning of these competences.

Therefore, this work has as its aim to present the pilot study carried out with a group of first-year students from the Grade Science of Physical Activity and Sport at the University of Alicante (Spain). The project sought to determine the usefulness of self-assessment and co-assessment in the teaching-learning of gymnastic and acrobatic skills. In this sense, observation as an instrument for the collection of information and the subsequent analysis of what has been observed appears as an essential element in the process. Similarly, the utilisation of technological devices such as video cameras and mobile phones –the latter within reach of most students nowadays– becomes an activity-facilitating element.

Finally, students will critically reflect on the method followed by their lecturers, identifying what they see as strengths and weaknesses of the whole process.

Method

Our research work adopts an experimental design where the dependent variable is the teaching of four basic acrobatic skills, and the assessment strategy used acts as the independent variable. It additionally responds to a qualitative methodology. Therefore, our research has a mixed approach. The sample comprises 114 students (92 males and 23 females) enrolled in the first-year subject Gymnastic and Artistic Skills, in the 2014-2015 academic year, who are divided into three groups for practical sessions. Instruments • Sheet for the observation of acrobatic skills • Video camera and mobile phone • Open-ended questionnaire with two questions All three-practice groups undergo an initial test focused on four acrobatic skills, namely: forward somersault; backward somersault; side cartwheel and handstand. This assessment is written down on an observation sheet if the different technical phases of those skills are fulfilled, and it is recorded with a camera. Subsequently, only in group 1, students record the execution of skills with a mobile phone and use the observation sheet delivered by the lecturer to analyse their own execution, after which a co-assessment exercise will be performed in groups of four. Once this initial process has been completed, the subject’s contents are implemented for two months. Group 1 will have the chance to use the recordings and observation sheets as a didactic tool which allows them to know the evolution of their teaching-learning process at all times. When the training period has come to its close, the lecturer does a final assessment of the learnt skills with all three groups, using the same recording sheet and the recording as instruments. Likewise, Group-1students repeat the same recording operation in order to carry out a final self-assessment and co-assessment of their learning progress. The information is collected so that the final results concerning the technical learning of these skills can be compared using the different assessment strategies. Moreover, all three groups will carry out a critical reflection exercise on the methods used by the teaching staff. Groups 2 and 3 follow a traditional methodological. After having described the procedure, the aim now consists in determining the extent to which students can regulate their own learning by means of self-assessment and co-assessment strategies. The SPSS 21.0 software package will be used to analyse the technical execution of the learnt skills. As for the treatment of qualitative data obtained from the open-ended questions, it is going to be performed through the AQUAD 7.

Expected Outcomes

This pilot study will be put into practice during the second semester of the current 2014/15 academic year, applying it to the compulsory 6-teaching-credit subject Gymnastic and Artistic Skills. This will hopefully allow us to offer the project’s final outcomes based on the collection of marks obtained by students in the technical execution of four basic acrobatic skills in the course of their training period. Our findings will additionally be grounded on these students’ critical perceptions and reflections about the different assessment strategies and observation tools utilized throughout their learning process. Their thoughts and experiences can bring us closer to improving our methodological approaches when it comes to the teaching of gymnastic contents. This project was conceived with the intention of checking whether observation, audiovisual media, self-assessment and co-assessment are suitable strategies that additionally contribute to achieving not only a more effective and more conscious regulation of learning but also a higher degree of understanding and control over the information on which classwork is based than when students use conventional strategies. It is also our expectation that the use of mobile phones by students will become a potential self-regulation tool for gymnastic and acrobatic skills learning.

References

Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students. conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 87-111. Delgado, M. A. (1991). Los Estilos de Enseñanza en Educación Física. Granada: ICE. Dyson, B., Griffin, L., & Hastie, P. (2004). Sport Education, Tactical Games, and Cooperative Learning: Theoretical and Pedagogical Considerations. QUEST, 56, 226-240. Fernández-Río, J. (2006). Estructuras de trabajo cooperativas, aprendizaje a través de claves y pensamiento crítico en la enseñanza de los deportes en el ámbito educativo. Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Actividades Físicas Cooperativas. Oleiros, A Coruña. Fraile, A. (2006) Cambios en el aula universitaria ante los nuevos retos europeos. Tandem, 20, 57-72. La Rioja. Grineski, S. (1996). Cooperative learning in physical education. Champaign II, Human Kinetics. Hargreaves, H. (2005). Personalising learning. iNet, UK, viewed on 28 June 2013, http://www.sstinet.net/resources/publications/personalisinglearningseries.aspx Hernández, J. L., Velázquez, R., Alonso, D., & Castejón, F. J. (2004). La evaluación de la Educación Física. Investigación y práctica en el ámbito escolar. Barcelona: Garó. López Pastor, V. M., Barba, J. J., Monjas, R., Manrique, J. C., Heras, C., González, M., & Gómez, J. M. (2007). Trece años de evaluación compartida en Educación Física. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, vol. 7 (26), 69-86. Mosston, M. & Ashworth, S. (1993). La enseñanza de la Educación Física. La reforma de los Estilos de Enseñanza. Barcelona: Hispano Europea. Slavin, R. (1990). Cooperative learning: theory research and practice New York: Plenum. Vernetta, M., López-Bedoya, J., & Delgado, M. A. (2009). La coevaluación en el aprendizaje de las habilidades gimnásticas en el ámbito del espacio europeo universitario. European Journal of Human Movement. Motricidad, 23, 123-141. Vernetta, M., Gutiérrez-Sánchez, A., López-Bedoya, J., & Ariza, L. (2013). El aprendizaje cooperativo en educación superior. Una experiencia en la adquisición de habilidades gimnásticas: Cultura y Educación: Culture and Education, 25(1), 3-16. Vernetta, M., López-Bedoya, J., & Robles, A. (2009). Evaluación compartida con fichas de observación durante el proceso de aprendizaje de las habilidades gimnásticas. Un estudio experimental. Rev. Iberoamericana de Educación, 50 (2), 1-14. Wilson, J. (1997). Self-regulated learners and distance education theory. Reviewed in December 2013 from http://www.usask.ca/ education/coursework/802papers /wilson/wilson.html

Author Information

University of Alicante
Alicante
Lilyan Vega Ramírez (presenting)
University of Alicante, Spain
University of Alicante, Spain

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.