Self-Study As A Driver For Change In Teacher Education–Learning The Lessons From A Department Wide Project
Author(s):
Viv Wilson (presenting / submitting) Karen Vincent (presenting) Kerry Jordan-Daus
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
15:30-17:00
Room:
209.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Christoph Schneider

Contribution

This paper outlines the outcomes of a two-year project within a teacher education department in a ‘new’ university in England. The project was aimed at increasing understanding of teaching and learning in teacher education, while simultaneously supporting teacher educators in their development as researchers. A self-study framework was adopted for the project as a whole. There was not a strongly established research culture in the department, nor an expectation that all academic staff would engage in research as well as teaching.

Most teacher educators in the department experienced high levels of teaching hours, coupled with supervision of student teachers on practicum. Their situation was thus similar to that of the university departments researched by Murray, Czerniawski and Barber (2011) and also to that of some teacher education departments elsewhere in Europe.  It was also similar to that outlined by Lunenberg, Zwart and Korthagen (2010) in their discussion of establishing a self-study group to support inexperienced teacher educator researchers in the Netherlands. The research objective was therefore to investigate the potential of self-study research as a means of supporting the development of a ‘researcherly disposition’ (Tack and Vanderlinde, 2014), while retaining the focus on practice, which was seen as central to the professional identities’ of the majority of department members.

A different strategic approach was taken compared to that used by Lunenberg et al (2010) which employed a pre-determined framework within which five participants conducted their self-study research.  A much larger group of teacher educators expressed initial interest in participating in the project (20+). Project activities were more fluid, and conducted without such a formal framework, although they formed a regular agenda item at Department meetings.

Self-study has been shown to be a powerful, and transformative research approach, developing and strengthening the professional knowledge of teacher educators and in articulating this distinctive knowledge (Loughran 2007, Lunenberg et al 2010 , Swennen, Volman, and Van Essen,. 2008). It requires ‘intentional and systematic inquiry into one’s own practice’ (Dinkelman, 2003), supported by collaborative discussion with peers in order to re-frame understanding and to validate findings (Samaras & Freece, 2009). However, self-study research is relatively unknown in the UK or wider European research context.  In a similar vein to Lunenberg et al (2010), Murray (2010) argues that forms of self-study research can act as research induction for new teacher educators, enabling them to  “articulate and extend the informal, work-based and often tacit learning taking place through teacher educators’ everyday work” (p.205).  Nevertheless, Murray also warns against the possibility that practitioner research in teacher education may become a ‘research cul de sac’ (Murray, op.cit p. 206), in that practitioner research has not been given status within a culture of research audits and competitive research ‘league tables’.  Consequently, forms of practitioner research, including that of self-study, may limit opportunities for teacher educators to engage in more ‘conventional research discourses and practices’ if their research remains within this paradigm. Whilst this caveat was recognised, within the context of the Departmental project outlined above, the promotion of self-study research was regarded as strategically appropriate in order to promote engagement in research activity and to retain a focus on developing teaching and learning.  

The research questions for the project as a whole focussed on two issues: how far self-study approaches supported teacher educators in developing their identities as researchers, and whether the establishment of a department-wide self-study project had facilitated the development of a collaborative research culture. Implicit within these questions was the focus on teaching and learning in teacher education, which characterises self-study.

Method

The study is an exploratory case study (Yin, 1994) conducted within a single institution. It draws upon multiple evidence sources including notes and records of meetings, semi-structured interviews with project participants, case studies of individual project members, self-study research journals and records of reflective conversations between the three main researchers. The semi-structured interview schedule was structured to elicit participants’ views on their involvement in the project in four key areas: perceived benefits of involvement; challenges and barriers to involvement; views on the project structure; perceptions of the Department culture as supportive of research engagement. Analysis was undertaken using a constant comparative approach (Corbin and Strauss, 2008) to identify emergent themes, and also to enable unexpected elements within the data to be identified. Analysis of the interviews was then compared to evidence from the notes and records of on-going meetings and events related to the project, and to the case studies of individual participants. The resulting key themes were shared with colleagues in the project group, both for ethical reasons and to examine early findings through the process of considering outcomes and interpretation from different perspectives within the group as a whole (Samaras and Freece, 2009 p.7). These themes, and the responses of project members then formed the focus of further reflective discussion and personal journal writing by the main researchers. During this second phase the self-study paradigm was used to conduct a critical re-appraisal of the project through the process of ‘turning the study on itself’ (Pinnegar, Hamilton and Fitzgerald, 2010). This led to a final conceptualisation of the three themes of ‘power’ ‘pre-disposition’ and ‘partnership’ as a framework for discussion.

Expected Outcomes

The outcomes of the research suggest there was a more evident and open culture of sharing practice in approaches to learning and teaching within the department, both formally and informally. The initial findings of the project were reported at ECER 2013 (Wilson, Jordan-Daus, Vincent and Graham-Mattheson). However, early indications that a community of enquiry was emerging within the department were not borne out during the second year, where colleagues were unable to sustain a commitment to systematic investigation of their own practice. The impacts of external inspection and internal re-organisation during the second year were highly disruptive to the more formal project structures and emphasised the fragility of the project in the face of competing pressures. However, the research has also indicated areas of uncertainty and tension around the project as a whole, conceptualised as issues of ‘power’, ‘pre-disposition’ and ‘partnership’. Dichotomies between the theoretical framework of the project and the project structures became evident as a barrier for some individuals, and correspond to the findings of Lunenberg at al (2010) Institutionalised expectations about the nature of research (Murray, 2010, Murray et al, 2011) also meant that the process of ‘self-study’ was both unfamiliar to colleagues and possibly under-valued. These two issues thus militated against the establishment of the formation of collaborative partnerships, which characterise self-study research. Nevertheless, and perhaps ironically, the process of undertaking this research study resulted in the formation of a sustained research partnership between ourselves, which has facilitated our own self-study work. The mixed outcomes of this research contribute to the debate about how to support teacher educators in transformative development through research into their own practice, and how far this form of development is valued within prevailing policy contexts of technical rationalism.

References

Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Dinkelman, T. (2003) Self-study in teacher education a means and ends tool for promoting reflective Journal of Teacher Education 54 (1) Loughran, J. (2007) Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58 (1), Lunenberg, M. Zwart, R. and Korthagen, F. (2010) Critical Issues in Supporting Self-Study. Teaching and Teacher Education 26. Murray, J. (2010) Towards a new language of scholarship in teacher educators’ professional learning. Professional Development in Education 36 (1-2) Murray, J. Czerniawski, G. and Barber, P. (2011): Teacher educators’ identities and work in England at the beginning of the second decade of the twenty-first century. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37 (3), Pinnegar, S., Hamilton, M.L., & Fitzgerald, L. (2010). Guidance in being and becoming self-study of practice researchers. In L. B. Erickson, J. R. Young & S. Pinnegar (Eds.), Navigating the Public and Private: Negotiating the Diverse Landscape of Teacher Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices. ) [Herstmonceux Castle, UK]. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University. Samaras, A. and Freece, A. (2009) Looking Back and Looking Forward: An Historical Overview of the Self-Study School in Lassonde, C. A. Galman, S. and Kosnik, C. (Eds), Self-Study Research Methodologies for Teacher Educators, 3-19. Sense Publishers Swennen, A. Volman, M. and Van Essen, M. (2008) The development of the professional identity of two teacher educators in the context of Dutch teacher education’, European Journal of Teacher Education, 31 (2), Tack, H. and Vanderlinde, R. (2014) Teacher Educators’ Professional Development: Towards a Typology of Teacher Educators’ Researcherly Disposition, British Journal of Educational Studies, 62 (3) Wilson,V., Jordan-Daus, K., Vincent, K. and Graham-Mattheson, L (2013) Developing teacher educators’ research capacity through a self-study group’ European Conference on Educational Research, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul. Yin R.K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed) London, Sage

Author Information

Viv Wilson (presenting / submitting)
Canterbury Christ Church University
Primary Education
Ramsgate
Karen Vincent (presenting)
Canterbury Christchurch University
School of Teacher Education and Development
Maidston
Canterbury Christ Church
Tonbridge

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.