Factors Affecting The Teaching And Learning Of English As A Foreign Language: An International Perspective
Author(s):
Ana Mirman-Flores (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 03, Language and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-07
11:00-12:30
Room:
305. [Main]
Chair:
Marit Honerød Hoveid

Contribution

In the last few years, we have witnessed a process of internationalisation of education, becoming one of the main objectives of the current society, in which now more than ever, the knowledge of a second language is not a mere alternative, but an essential requirement for a more complete development in many areas of life (ESLC, 2012). This research aims at assessing the teaching and learning of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) both in a national (Spain) and international (Greece) context. It uses the data collected in the European Survey on Language Competences (ESLC) of 2012to start from, as it reflected the low results of Spanish students in the three areas assessed in comparison with the results obtained by Greek students. Thus, it highlights the need to analyse those variables or factors that influence decisively in the acquisition of English in order to improve the quality of education in this field. This leads us to consider the role played by external or contextual factors and the students’ self-concept in the process of learning English.

Therefore, one of the key variables considered in this research is the students’ socioeconomic and family background, as it plays a significant role on their learning. Some national and international evaluation studies show the relationship between the level of performance achieved by the students and the social, economic and cultural status of their families (Heckman, 2006). In terms of the environmental exposure to English, several researches show that Spanish students barely practice this language outside the classroom (European Commission, 2006; Bonnet, 2003). Due to the expansion of the linguistic, cultural and ethnic diversity in Europe, many students are growing up in multilingual and multicultural contexts in which different social groups promote the coexistence of several languages. Inevitably, this intercultural contact may influence the willingness of EFL students to learn about the culture and, consequently, their behaviour will be motivated throughout the learning process. Numerous researches (Agnihotri, 1996; Cummins, 2000; Heugh and Skutnabb-Kangas, 2010; Hornberger, 2003; Pennycook, 1994, 2007) have shown that globally, multilingualism is the norm, not the exception (Joseph and Ramani, 2012). English is used in most of the multilingual contexts. However, for some reason, our society still tends to operate with a monolingual consciousness.

The other key aspect of this research is the role that self-concept plays within the learning process, understood as the subjective conditions about oneself that play a determining role in individuals’ further growth and development (Bandura, 1997; Bong and Shaalvik, 2003). According to authors like Riding and Rayner (2001), when the student recognises their particular achievements and potential for learning, they are more likely to reach their ability level and to confirm social feedback on the basis of which they maintain and enhance their self-concept. Therefore, the causal order of self-concept and academic performance is highly significant and, as Byrne (1996) noted, the motivational characteristics that self-concept has could lead to changes in academic performance, and this is reflected in matters like learning a foreign language.

The doctoral research on which this paper draws, is oriented towards an European/international comparison of the personal, socioeconomic and educational factors influencing the process of teaching and learning English as a foreign language within Secondary students of two European countries: Greece and Spain. Therefore, the basic research objectives are: to understand possible causes why Spain produces poor results in international tests in English as a foreign language; to find out how we can help students to achieve a higher level in English; and to discover the key of the results Greece presents in English tests.

Method

In order to address the objectives, a number of instruments and mixed methods (both qualitative and quantitative) will be used for the collection and analysis of data. A total of six secondary schools from two different European countries (Greece and Spain) constitute the sample, including students and teachers. This study also intends to take in two different comparisons: on the one hand, a national comparison between two Spanish contexts (a bilingual and a monolingual one); on the other hand, an international comparison between two monolingual contexts (Greece and Spain) will be carried out. The cases have been selected by using a non-probability sampling, according to the following criteria: a) the results obtained in the ESLC 2012; b) the nature of the context (monolingual/bilingual); and the curriculum (monolingual/bilingual) offered by the school. In order to equalise the sample, all the schools need to be urban and a minimum of two groups of students from an ISCED-2 level will be taken into account. A total of 400 students and 15 teachers approximately are expected to participate in this research. In order to collect the information we needed, the students filled two questionnaires based on a Likert scale’s: the first one contains three blocks of questions about the student’s context (their parents, siblings and themselves) and it was designed specifically for this research and previously validated by a group of experts in the field; and the other one based on their Self-Concept, adapted from Roncel Vega’s (2000) previous work, has three blocks of questions again and it contains questions related to attitude towards English, behaviour in the classroom and easiness for languages. Lastly, the teachers also filled a questionnaire with open-ended items about their methodology while teaching English to these students. The data collected so far in the monolingual Spanish context includes the answers of 186 students and 5 teachers from two schools. All the data obtained both from the instrument’s validation, and from the students and the teachers’ answers, is being analysed with SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). For the validation of the first instrument, Kendall’s W was used to assess agreement and links between all the experts. In reference to the data obtained from the two schools, two different studies have been carried out so far: a descriptive study and then a contrast analysis by using the Mann-Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA.

Expected Outcomes

The expected results will measure the impact of the factors influencing the processes of learning and teaching English, and it will help us getting ready for achieving a better development of the student in future assessments. By comparing the Greek results with the Spanish ones, we will try to find out the reasons why Greek students have proven to do better. From the data collected so far, we have identified two main variables that strongly influence the students’ English learning: their own context and their behaviour in the classroom. Firstly, the role played by the context surrounding the student when learning English has a decisive impact on how the student learns this subject. A student who is acquainted with English from his/her familiar and social environment and uses all the learning opportunities he/she is provided with, inevitably will perform better in the English tests. Secondly, the student’s attitude during English lessons is another key factor in the learning process. Attitudes such as feeling comfortable when speaking English in public, being afraid to make mistakes, understanding the teacher’s explanations, the fear to fail, etc., affects the way we learn English. Therefore, the relationship between self-concept and academic achievement has important implications and contains motivational properties that may affect the concept one has of oneself. The future collection of data from the other participating contexts in this research looks for highlighting the importance of the factors mentioned above and also looks for new possible variables that affect EFL. We also forward to make an European comparison to learn the differences that somehow make Greek students perform better than Spanish, despite the social and cultural similarities both countries present.

References

Agnihotri, R. (1996). Sociolinguistic aspects of multilingual classrooms. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Language in Education, University of Cape Town: South Africa. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York. Bong, M. y Shaalvik, E.M. (2003) Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 15, 1.pp. 1-40. Bonnet, G. (ed.) (2003). The assessment of pupils’ skills in English in eight European countries. Paris: Le Réseau européen des responsables de l'évaluation des systèmes éducatifs. Byrne, B. M. (1996). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept (pp. 287 –316). New York: Wiley. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. European Commission (2006). Special Eurobarometer 243. Europeans and their Languages. Recuperado el 28 de abril de 2014 de http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_en.pdf Heckman, J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900-1902. Heugh, K., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (Eds.) (2010). Multilingual education works. New Delhi, India: Orient Black Swan. Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Continua of biliteracy, 315-339. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa- INEE (2012). Estudio Europeo de Competencia Lingüística EECL. Volúmenes I y II Informe español. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Joseph, M. & Ramani, E. (2012). “Glocalization”: Going Beyond the Dichotomy of Global Versus Local Through Additive Multilingualism. International Multilingual Research Journal, 6(1), 22-34. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. England: Longman. Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. New York: Routledge. Riding, R.J., Rayner, S. (2001) International perspectives on individual differences: Vol. 2 Self Perception. USA: Ablex Publishing. Roncel Vega, V. (2000). El rendimiento en una lengua extranjera en enseñanza secundaria. Un modelo causal. Tesis doctoral inédita. Universidad de Sevilla.

Author Information

Ana Mirman-Flores (presenting / submitting)
University of Seville
Seville

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.