Session Information
WERA SES 04 C, Integrating Marginalised Education Spaces into Mainstream Global Discourses
Paper Session
Contribution
Statement of the problem/objective
Women’s voluntary participation outside their households like in community development projects led to dramatic improvements in various social spheres, like health and education and brought social change in many developed and developing societies (Al-Ali, 1997; Escobar, 1995; Rosander, 1997). However, voluntary participation presents challenges because it is not a mutually exclusive activity for women from their other daily activities. Women are entangled in complex knots of everyday roles both inside (wives, mothers, etc.) and outside (labor market participant, voluntary worker, etc.) their households.
Greater involvement of women holds the promise of much more effective and equitable processes of development. But it also means changes in women’s lives and identities (Chatty & Rabo, 1997), resulting into their change in behaviours and attitudes (Mustillo, Wilson & Lynch, 2004; Ostrom, 1990; Shah, 1998). But an insufficient understanding of such changes, and a mere superficial knowledge of women’s lives guides most policy making in the community development project sphere, ignoring the complexity and the constant evolving nature of their lives (Chavis & Florin, 1990; Green, 1998; Mansuri & Rao, 2004; Conning & Kevane, 2002).
Thus, the primary question that guides this research is what is the relationship between playing different roles – labour market participant, family involvement, community involvement and participation – and the attitude about the self among women over time?
This study uses data from an existing survey that provides myriad of information on different aspects of the everyday life of women to describe and understand the complex relationships between attitudinal aspects and different factors of everyday-role-playing. Innovative use of existing data to provide solutions to social problems connects directly to the overall theme of the conference, “The Power of Education Research for Innovation in Practice and Policy”. The findings also address the issue of educating policy framers of community development projects on what it means for women, playing multiple roles every day, participate inside and outside their households and how can they be better prepared to do so.
Theoretical Frameworks
This research study is guided by two interrelated theoretical frameworks – role theory in sociology, and the theory of identity construction through role-playing.
Role theorists define a role as an expected pattern or set of behaviours that exists in the minds of people (Ilgen & Hollenbeck, 1991) and performed to fulfil personal and social expectations (Heiss, 1981). Focusing mainly on how the enactment of one role interacts with the other roles, they emphasize that the involvement of persons in multiple roles can be complex and stress-provoking (Katz & Kahn, 1978), since multiple roles can have conflicting demands. Both individual and social factors determine how one combines roles (Turner, 1978). In theories of identity construction through role playing, roles are defined as complex web of interconnections that integrate self, others and culture (Gergen, 1991). In social contexts, the self-defined ‘I’, and the poignant connectedness and interdependence with others, interact to form identity (Rolland, 1988). In case of women playing different roles, the process develops into women’s different negotiable identities that have certain core values and beliefs as their fundamental nature. As a result, identity construction involves a process of negotiation of social roles and expectations with personal beliefs (Golden, 2001; McCall & Simmons, 1978; Weigert, Teitge & Teitge, 1986).
Reaping the benefits of the common claims of the two theories that there is a connection between role-playing and social construction of identity, a conceptual framework is built to guide the study in exploring whether playing different roles in the labour market, family and community everyday lead a woman’s attitude about the self in a certain way.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
References Chavis, D. & Florin, P. (1990). Community development, community participation. Prevention Office, Bureau of Drug Abuse Services, San Jose, CA. Conning, J. & Kevane, M. (2002). Community based targeting mechanisms for social safety nets: A critical review. World Development, 30(3), p. 375-94. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self. New York: Basic Books. Golden, A. (2001). Modernity and the communicative management of multiple roles: The case of the worker-parent. The Journal of Family Communications, 4, p. 233-264. Green, R. H. (1998). Problematics and pointers about participatory research and gender. In Guijit, I. & Shah, M. K. (eds). The myth of community: Gender issues in participatory development, p. 71-77. Colchester, UK: Intermediate Technology Development Group Pub. Heiss, J. (1981). Social roles. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (p. 94-129). New York: Basic Books. McCall, G. & Simmons, J. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press. Mansuri, G. & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and –driven development: A critical review. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), p. 1-39. Mustillo, S., Wilson, J. & Lynch, S. M. (2004). Legacy volunteering: A test of two theories of intergenerational transmission. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), p. 530-541. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Senegal and Morocco. In D. Chatty & A. Rabo (eds.) Organizing women: Formal and informal women’s groups n the Middle. East, p. 101-123. New York, NY: Berg Shah, M. K. (1998). Gendered perceptions of well-being and social change in Darko, Ghana. In Guijit, I. & Shah, M. K. (eds). The myth of community: Gender issues in participatory development. p. 141-151. Colchester, UK: Intermediate Technology Development Group Pub. Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, p. 1-23. Weigert, A., Teitge, J. & Teitge, D. (1986). Society and identity: Towards a sociological psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.