Apparatuses in Arts Education: The Expropriation of the Transition, Exception and Subjectivity Spaces by the ICT.
Author(s):
Tiago Assis (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

29 SES 03, Apparatuses, transitions and experiences in arts education

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
17:15-18:45
Room:
557.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Catarina Silva Martins

Contribution

From my teaching experience of technology in arts education contexts and info-excluded communities, I start to reflect on this text my concerns about the consequences of technology in terms of power, culture, identity and language. Focused on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), I establish a problematic between instruction and emancipation. In the case of arts education, my experience can cover different levels of education: Secondary and post-graduation cycles. This problematic trace lines of research which, although diffuse, try to match the problem in development of electronic platforms for education, in each of these cycles, and also in extreme situations as in the case of info-excluded communities.

From this fundamentally empirical approach, I try, in the second part of the text, to analyze the concept of apparatus and, in the third part, to develop a research that contextualizes in arts education, particularly in its technological field. So, I focus, first, in a more abstract and theoretical level, primarily from Foucault and Agamben, where I try to clarify the issue of terminology between procedural apparatuses and inventions, which in amplified analysis allows to identify them again, as capturing apparatuses. Secondly, I raise some points on the complexity involved between Art and Education opening, albeit briefly, at an historical level, but above all, trying to defend what, in its contradictions, creates the possibility of an emancipatory experience. I add here also the technological issues and I clarify the concept of technique.

Under this clarification, I trace a framework of what makes up this great network and maximum apparatus that is education. And in that framework, I analyze some relationships between the living beings and apparatuses, in order to understand the implications for subjects who populate that network. In this effort of contextualization, some apparatuses in arts education and the roles they play in that network. I delve the relativity that the very terminology gains in the educational and artistic context, but above all, as the ICT apparatuses, captures the gesture of the students in a procedural instructory trap, expropriating their spaces of transition, exception and subjectivity, fundamental spaces for arts education and for the possible emancipatory experience. In the form of research project, I present a rescue strategy of these spaces reconfiguring ICT in arts education.

Method

We can summarize this project in three phases. The first phase corresponds to the reflection on the experience experienced by me in these two large laboratories: Education and info-excluded communities. The first laboratory consists of the experiences of three levels of education and the second laboratory functions as radical experiment that tests and calls into question the actions and lessons learned in the first laboratory. This empirical phase, from the point of view of the methods, is framed in action/research and raises the central question about the involvement of apparatuses in education. The second phase of the project seeks a theoretical framework for these apparatuses from Foucault and Agamben. As such, I can say that at first I align myself with the genealogical and exclusion principles, and at second, I follow the Agambenian perspective that amplifies apparatus concept. In the third and final part of the project, I began a reflection that forces the intersection of action/research with the theoretical framework proposed. By involving different methods in its different phases, the project enters the risky terrain crossing these same methods. I think that from the analysis of this cross emerges a methodology, because beyond the crossing methods, the specific subject of ICT is in itself, extension and methodological amputation. Then speaking from a double perspective that on one hand, it allowed to be captured by the methodological apparatus of this project and, on the other hand, attempts to analyze the same catch. In this sense, to speak of method in this project is also talk of its outcome. To give it a name is to call it: nihilism.

Expected Outcomes

We have therefore this methodological outcome which is no more than a theoretical and practical framework of the conflict between the living beings and the research and arts education apparatuses. From this conflict results this two levels: a critical level for the expropriation of subjectivity spaces, caused by the apparatuses of ICT, which are precisely the territory of resistance, from which emerges a second level in the form of action, proposing to reroot these apparatuses in the language of students, in order to rescue these spaces.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. Profanations. Translated by Jeff Fort. New York: Zone Books, 2007. ———. The Coming Community. Minneapolis, Minn., [etc.]: University of Minnesota Press, 1993. ———. The Open: Man and Animal. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2004. ———. What Is an Apparatus?: And Other Essays. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2009. ———. Infancy and History: The Destruction of Experience. Translated by Liz Heron. London: Verso, 1993. Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation (The Body in Theory: Histories of Cultural Materialism). Translated by Sheila Faria Glaser. MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1994. ———. Symbolic Exchange and Death. Translated by Iain Hamilton Grant. London: Sage Publication, 1993. Benjamin, Walter. One-way street and other writings. London; New York: Penguin, 2009. Foucault, Michel, Alan Sheridan. The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972. Foucault, Michel. ‘What is an Author?’. In Writing, no. 73, 299-314. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969. ———. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980. ———. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books, 1995. Rancière, Jacques. The Emancipated Spectator. Verso, London, 2009. ———. The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1991. McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994.

Author Information

Tiago Assis (presenting / submitting)
i2ADS Instituto de Investigação em Arte, Design e Sociedade, Portugal

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.