Asymptotic Sampling distribution for a simple case of Coefficient Alpha
Author(s):
Rsshid Almehrizi (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 08 A, Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Tests and Assessments (Part 1)

Paper Session to be continued in 09 SES 12 A

Time:
2015-09-10
09:00-10:30
Room:
326. [Main]
Chair:
Eugenio Gonzalez

Contribution

Coefficient alpha (Cronbach, 1951) is the primary reliability coefficient in classical test theory for researchers. In practice, it is important to determine whether coefficient alpha is high as well as whether it provides a stable estimation of the true reliability. As with any point estimator, sample coefficient alpha is subject to variability around the true parameter, particularly in small samples. Thus, a better appraisal of the reliability of test scores is obtained by using an interval estimator for coefficient alpha. There is a compelling argument for the use of an interval estimator, instead of a point estimator, for reliability coefficient. The sampling distribution of split-half reliability coefficient is useful to perform inferential statistics to guide the interpretation of the coefficient and testing hypothesis regarding the equality of the coefficients.

 

Kristof (1963) and Feldt (1965) independently derived the exact distribution of the alpha coefficient under the assumption that the covariance matrix of items has a compound symmetry form. Also, van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) derived the asymptotic normal distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of the alpha coefficient under a more general condition in which compound symmetry of the covariance matrix is not assumed. Charter (2000; 2001) and Feldt & Charter (2003) provided a confidence interval for split-half reliability coefficient as a simple case of the sampling distribution of coefficient alpha for two-part test.

 

However, the existing methods for estimating the sampling distribution of coefficient alpha were different from the true simulated distribution for small number of parts and small sample size (van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel, 2000). In addition, procedures based on Kristof (1963) and Feldt (1965) are not general given the assumption of compound symmetry which might not be supported by practice.

 

The paper aims to propose an asymptotic sampling distribution of the simple case of coefficient alpha for two items or two parts (split-half reliability coefficient) with no assumption regarding the covariance matrix of the two split halves using Delta method. In addition, the paper aims to compare the performance of the proposed sampling distribution and van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) under different test conditions.

 

Sampling distribution of Simple case of Coefficient Alpha

Coefficient alpha gives the internal consistency reliability of test scores composed of n items. I.e.,

 ,

where  is the sum of item score variances and  is the test summed score variance.

Coefficient alpha for two items or two parts is a simple case of coefficient alpha which gives the split-half reliability coefficient (Rulon, 1939).

 ,

where  and  are the covariance and correlation between the summed raw scores on the two parts,  and  are the sample variances of the summed raw scores on the two parts, and , and  is the test summed score variance. The corresponding point estimate is calculated using the sample counterparts from a sample of  examinees, i.e.,

 .

After tedious derivations, the sampling standard error variance for , using delta method under the assumption of a bivariate normal distribution, is

 .

If the assumption of compound symmetry of covariance matrix () is assumed,

,

which equals Kristof’s (1963) and Feldt’s (1965) sampling error variance for coefficient alpha for two-part test.

Method

A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to assess the performance of standard error variances for α ̂_2 under different test conditions based on test length (n=2,6,10,30), sample sizes (N=10,30,100), ratio of variance of the two halves (σ_1/σ_2 =1,0.5,0.25), and correlation of the two parts (ρ_12=1,0.8,0.5). Paired samples from a bivariate normal distribution for the two halve scores were generated for each of the test conditions. For each condition, 5,000 runs were performed. In each run, the split-half reliability coefficient was estimated. Three procedures were used to obtain the sampling variance for split-half: Procedure 1: proposed sampling variance and van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) using the true parameters. Procedure 2: The sampling variance is obtained based on 500 simulations of random samples of size N from split half for n items using the true parameters. Thus 500 split-half reliability coefficients are computed and the sample variance of them is reported. Procedure 3: In each of the above 500 simulations, the proposed sampling variance of split-half coefficient and van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) are computed using the particular sample covariance matrix of the two splits. The mean of these 500 variances is reported. The sampling variance obtained in procedure 2 may be considered as the true sampling error variance for the particular sample size N.

Expected Outcomes

Tentative results shows that the proposed sampling error variance were closer to the true sampling error variance than van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) especially for small sample sizes. The results are very promising to continue deriving the sampling distribution of coefficient alpha for n parts.

References

Charter, R. A. (2000). Confidence interval formulas for split-half reliability coefficients. Psychological Report, 86, 1168-1170. Charter, R. A. (2001). Testing the equality of two or more split-half reliability coefficients. Psychological Report, 88, 844-846. Cronbach, L. J. (1947). Test reliability: Its meaning and determination. Psychometika, 12, 1-16. Feldt, L.S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty. Psychometrika, 30, 357–370. Feldt, L.S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In R.L. Linn (Ed.). Educational Measurement (Third edition). NewYork: Macmillan. Feldt, L. S. & Charter, R. A. (2003). Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychological Methods, 8, 102-109. Hayashi, K. Kamata , A. (2005). A note on the estimator of the alpha coefficient for standardized variables under normality. Psychometrika, 70(3), 579–586. Rulon, P. J. (1939). A simplified procedure for determining the reliability of a test by split-halves. Harvard Educational Review, 9, 99-103. Van Zyl, J.M., Neudecker, H., & Nel, D.G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 65, 271–280.

Author Information

Rsshid Almehrizi (presenting / submitting)
Sultan Qaboos University
Psychology
Muscat

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.