Session Information
09 SES 08 A, Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Tests and Assessments (Part 1)
Paper Session to be continued in 09 SES 12 A
Contribution
Coefficient alpha (Cronbach, 1951) is the primary reliability coefficient in classical test theory for researchers. In practice, it is important to determine whether coefficient alpha is high as well as whether it provides a stable estimation of the true reliability. As with any point estimator, sample coefficient alpha is subject to variability around the true parameter, particularly in small samples. Thus, a better appraisal of the reliability of test scores is obtained by using an interval estimator for coefficient alpha. There is a compelling argument for the use of an interval estimator, instead of a point estimator, for reliability coefficient. The sampling distribution of split-half reliability coefficient is useful to perform inferential statistics to guide the interpretation of the coefficient and testing hypothesis regarding the equality of the coefficients.
Kristof (1963) and Feldt (1965) independently derived the exact distribution of the alpha coefficient under the assumption that the covariance matrix of items has a compound symmetry form. Also, van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) derived the asymptotic normal distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of the alpha coefficient under a more general condition in which compound symmetry of the covariance matrix is not assumed. Charter (2000; 2001) and Feldt & Charter (2003) provided a confidence interval for split-half reliability coefficient as a simple case of the sampling distribution of coefficient alpha for two-part test.
However, the existing methods for estimating the sampling distribution of coefficient alpha were different from the true simulated distribution for small number of parts and small sample size (van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel, 2000). In addition, procedures based on Kristof (1963) and Feldt (1965) are not general given the assumption of compound symmetry which might not be supported by practice.
The paper aims to propose an asymptotic sampling distribution of the simple case of coefficient alpha for two items or two parts (split-half reliability coefficient) with no assumption regarding the covariance matrix of the two split halves using Delta method. In addition, the paper aims to compare the performance of the proposed sampling distribution and van Zyl, Neudecker, and Nel (2000) under different test conditions.
Sampling distribution of Simple case of Coefficient Alpha
Coefficient alpha gives the internal consistency reliability of test scores composed of n items. I.e.,
,
where is the sum of item score variances and is the test summed score variance.
Coefficient alpha for two items or two parts is a simple case of coefficient alpha which gives the split-half reliability coefficient (Rulon, 1939).
,
where and are the covariance and correlation between the summed raw scores on the two parts, and are the sample variances of the summed raw scores on the two parts, and , and is the test summed score variance. The corresponding point estimate is calculated using the sample counterparts from a sample of examinees, i.e.,
.
After tedious derivations, the sampling standard error variance for , using delta method under the assumption of a bivariate normal distribution, is
.
If the assumption of compound symmetry of covariance matrix () is assumed,
,
which equals Kristof’s (1963) and Feldt’s (1965) sampling error variance for coefficient alpha for two-part test.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Charter, R. A. (2000). Confidence interval formulas for split-half reliability coefficients. Psychological Report, 86, 1168-1170. Charter, R. A. (2001). Testing the equality of two or more split-half reliability coefficients. Psychological Report, 88, 844-846. Cronbach, L. J. (1947). Test reliability: Its meaning and determination. Psychometika, 12, 1-16. Feldt, L.S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty. Psychometrika, 30, 357–370. Feldt, L.S., & Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In R.L. Linn (Ed.). Educational Measurement (Third edition). NewYork: Macmillan. Feldt, L. S. & Charter, R. A. (2003). Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length. Psychological Methods, 8, 102-109. Hayashi, K. Kamata , A. (2005). A note on the estimator of the alpha coefficient for standardized variables under normality. Psychometrika, 70(3), 579–586. Rulon, P. J. (1939). A simplified procedure for determining the reliability of a test by split-halves. Harvard Educational Review, 9, 99-103. Van Zyl, J.M., Neudecker, H., & Nel, D.G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 65, 271–280.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.