Session Information
04 SES 01 A, International Perspectives on Inclusive Education
Paper Session
Contribution
Despite all effort undertaken in the frame of Education for All (EFA) and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for free, compulsory, and quality elementary education for all children and youths, especially with respect to developing countries education for all (lifelong and of high quality) is still challenged regarding the dimensions of inclusion: access, acceptance, participation and learning achievement (Booth, Ainscow, Black-Hawkins, Vaughan, & Shaw, 2000; Kalambouka, Farrell, Dyson, & Kaplan, 2005 as cited in Artiles, Kozleski, Dorn, & Christensen, 2006, p. 67). Various parts of the population for example still are without access to education, or students drop out prematurely from the formal educational system. However, it is remarkable that international efforts towards inclusive education strongly stimulate and interrelate with processes of change which take place on political and societal level as well as in the concrete schools in developing countries. Accordingly it can be stated that transitions with regard to efforts of the development of a common understanding and the implementation of inclusive education in an international perspective are strongly interrelated with complex transition processes especially within developing countries, which is our focus here.
Furthermore it has to be emphasized that applied research is still lacking to pinpoint the mechanisms that determine the success or failure of inclusion in educational systems in developing countries. Financed by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development, under the mandate of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH the international research consortium Research for inclusive education in international cooperation (refie) conducted a detailed investigation about the implementation of inclusive education in two pilot countries, namely Guatemala and Malawi.
The overall guiding research questions were: How is the concept of Inclusive Education constructed on the different levels from various perspectives in Guatemala and Malawi? Which success factors of and barriers to inclusive educational systems can be identified in order to draw conclusions for further developing cooperation measures? The specific research questions are structured and oriented on the above mentioned four dimensions of inclusive education (ibid.), namely Access, Acceptance, Participation and Learning Achievement. This research project focussed on Access, Acceptance and Participation on macro, meso and micro level.
The research identifies how educational systems can be structured more inclusive and what the success factors and barriers are in doing so. In terms of potential for improvement, the research formulates concrete recommendations for action, particularly with respect to targeting disadvantaged population groups for inclusive education.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Apel, H., Engler, S., Friebertshäuser, B., Fuhs, B. & Zinnecker, J. (1995). Kulturanalyse und Ethnographie. Vergleichende Feldforschung im studentischen Raum. In E. König & P. Zedler (Ed.), Bilanz Qualitativer Forschung. 2. Methoden (pp. 343-375). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag Artiles, A., Kozleski, E., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. A. (2006). Learning in inclusive education research: Re-mediating theory and methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30, 65-108. Flick, U. (1996). Psychologie des technisierten Alltags. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Flick, U. (2004). Qualitative Sozialforschung. (Vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Neuausgabe, 2. Aufl.). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Friebertshäuser, B. (1992). Übergangsphase Studienbeginn. Eine Feldstudie über Riten der Initiation in eine studentische Fachkultur. Weinheim, München: Juventa. Laging, R. (2008). Wissenschaftlicher Quellentext und Fallvergleich als Auswertungsverfahren qualitativer Ganztagsschulforschung. [speech] Vortrag auf der dvs-Tagung Sportpädagogik an der Deutschen Sporthochschule Köln vom 22. bis zum 24. Mai 2008. Retrieved from http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb21/ifsm/ ganztagsschule/vortraege/dvs-2008[17.01.2014]. Lamnek, S. (1995): Qualitative Sozialforschung. Bd. 2 Methoden und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz. Lamnek, S. (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Lehrbuch. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Verlag. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 443 – 466). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Strauss, A. L. (1994). Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. München: Fink. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1996). Grounded Theory. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. Wolff, S. (2008). Dokumenten- und Aktenanalyse. In: Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., Steinke, I. (Ed.). Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.