Greek Roma’s Educational Pathways: Mapping Factors Leading to Success
Author(s):
Panagiota Gkofa (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES G 08, Education and Research

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
09:00-10:30
Room:
326. [Main]
Chair:
Petra Grell

Contribution

General Description: Children from Roma communities are among the persistently lowest academic achievers in many European countries (Symeou, Luciak & Gobbo, 2009) and the same is true in Greece. In Greek schools, Roma students experience high dropout rates, low performance and higher levels of non completion compared to their Greek (non-Roma) peers (Nikolaou, 2009). In Greece, as elsewhere, the Roma experience social exclusion and wide-spread discrimination. However, there are some cases of Greek Roma who achieve educational success against the odds. Drawing on a set of in-depth interviews with twenty Greek Roma who have entered higher education, this paper examines how these participants account for their educational success. Although the participants’ backgrounds vary in terms of socioeconomics, gender, age and the local area where they come from, similar educational experiences that contribute to their success are reported in many cases. This paper investigates the core factors involved in such success. 

Background: In the Greek national context, the Roma are legally Greek citizens who are regarded as belonging to vulnerable social groups (Dragonas, 2012) and are not officially recognised as a minority group (Kostadinova, 2011). Most Roma use their community language, Romani (Nikolaou, 2009), and mainly follow different cultural traditions compared to those of the Greek community. While the Roma in Greece are not a homogeneous group, to an extent, patriarchal attitudes and traditional gendered regimes are still evident in shaping aspects of social and cultural life (Chatzisavvidis, 2007). In Greece, the Roma are frequently reviled and discriminated against. In response to patterns of exclusion and the ‘under-achievement’ of Roma in the education system, state education programmes have targeted their schooling for the last two decades without much success. In contrast to the usual emphasis on Roma’s educational disadvantage, this paper is based on one core research question of my on-going doctoral study where I attempt to explore what has made the difference in the case of my highly unusual group. The interview questions centre on themes related to my Roma participants’ family, its support for education, their early education experiences and their secondary schooling in order to tease out the factors which facilitated their educational progression.

Research Focus: This paper’s main research question is as follows: ‘What factors facilitate Roma’s success in Greek education?’ Accessing higher education is used as a proxy for educational success in my study, although what counts as educational success is contestable. This paper aims at mapping key success factors which enabled twenty Roma in Greece to ‘make a difference’ by entering higher education.

Conceptual framework: As DiMaggio (1982, p 189) argued some time ago, “it takes more than measured ability to do well in school”. Factors of class, culture and familiarity with the system all have a part to play in students’ progression. These attributes have been discussed as forms of capital by Pierre Bourdieu. In this paper, I draw on the Bourdieusian concepts of habitus and capital –economic, cultural, social- in order to analyse and theorise how my Roma participants who have accessed higher education in Greece –a form of success ‘against the odds’- account for their educational success. 

Method

Roma people with successful educational paths in Greece are a ‘hard to access’ group (Trevor & Newburn, 2001) because no official data for Roma students are held by any higher institutions as the Roma do not represent a minority group. Key gatekeepers and mediators such as Professors at Greek Universities, Services at the Greek Ministry of Education, Roma Organisations and NGOs have facilitated my access to some educationally successful participants. It was particularly difficult to access female participants. Eventually, through snowballing techniques, I conducted in-depth narrative interviews with twenty participants (six Roma females and fourteen Roma males) who are currently studying or have graduated from University. During the interviews, the six following themes were introduced to and developed by my participants: higher studies; family background/childhood experiences; school life; concept of success; career/workplace (experiences, aspirations); suggestions for the improvement of Roma’s educational provision. Τhe audio-recorded interviews were transcribed into text (in Greek). I coded each interview following a process of open coding where data were ‘broken down into discrete parts, closely examined and compared for similarities and differences’ (Strauss & Corbin, 1998, p. 102). Each interview was coded in order to locate structures, patterns, differences and common themes. After reading each interview transcript, first, I underlined core ideas raised and made relevant notes in the margins. I gave emphasis to insightful ideas and ideas which were consistent with or opposite to my readings. Then, I organised these ideas into themes. Thus, in each interview, I grouped the ideas, events and actions which were similar under more abstract categories, which ‘have analytic power because they have the potential to explain and predict’ (Strauss & Corbin, 1998, p 102). Next, I underscored common themes or issues that arose from my participants. At this step, I turned to codes; the codes I used derived mainly from the literature review and from the data themselves through my participants’ stories. In this paper, I focus on how these twenty participants account for their educational success.

Expected Outcomes

This paper discusses the key factors which were reported by my participants as having contributed to their educational success. The main ‘success’ factors are grouped as follows: a) influences of family/home on educational success (familial attitudes towards education as well as the Roma families’ living conditions and financial situation are included in this category); b) influences of school on educational success (the part some inspiring teachers had in participants’ progression is detailed); c) influences of community on educational success (aspects such as Roma mentors and role models: peers, religious sources and groups, volunteers and helpful adults are included); d) influences of locality issues on educational success; e) influences of individual and circumstantial issues on educational success. Looking at those factors which enabled Roma’s educational success against the odds seems a useful starting point in any attempt to, first, understand ‘educational success’ achieved by the Roma in Greece and, second, inform policies to realise social justice for the Roma in practice and enhance educational success for this group. This paper hopefully adds to any attempt to approach Roma’s education through a broader transnational perspective enabling a critical discussion of the current practices across different European countries regarding Roma’s education and informing relevant European policies.

References

Chatzissavidis, S. (2007). Οι Ρομ στην ιστορία της ανθρωπότητας και στην Ελλάδα [The Roma in the history of humanity and of Greece]. In Greek Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs-The University of Thessaly (eds), Ετερότητα στη Σχολική Τάξη και Διδασκαλία της Ελληνικής Γλώσσας και των Μαθηματικών: η περίπτωση των Τσιγγανοπαίδων, Πρόγραμμα: «Ένταξη Τσιγγανοπαίδων στο σχολείο», Επιμορφωτικός Οδηγός [Diversity in the Classroom and the Teaching of the Greek language and Mathematics: the case of Gypsy children, Programme ‘Gypsy children’s Inclusion in school’, Training guide] (pp. 39-64). Volos. DiMaggio P. (1982). Cultural Capital and School Success: The Impact of Status Culture Participation on the Grades of U.S. High School Students, American Sociological Review, 47 (2), 189-201. Dragonas, Th. (2012) Roma mothers and their young children. Unpublished Report, Bernard Van Leer Foundation. Kostadinova, G. (2011). Minority Rights as a Normative Framework for Addressing the Situation of Roma in Europe. Oxford Development Studies, 39(2), 163-183. Nikolaou, G. (2009). Teacher training on Roma education in Greece: a discussion about the results of INSETRom experience in two Greek schools. Intercultural Education, 20(6), 549-557. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, California; London: Sage. Symeou, L., Luciak, M. & Gobbo, F. (2009). Teacher training for Roma inclusion: implementation, outcomes and reflections of the INSETRom project. Intercultural Education, 20(6), 493-496. Trevor, J. & Newburn, T. (2001). Widening access: Improving police relations with hard to reach groups. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit.

Author Information

Panagiota Gkofa (presenting / submitting)
King's College London
Department of Education and Professional Studies
London

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.