Session Information
27 SES 12 A, Analysing Effects of Different Learning Environements
Paper/Poster Session
Contribution
Adaptive education as a pedagogical concept describes a matching of educational contents and teaching/learning methods to the individual requirements of students by differentiation and individualization. This matching results of a continuously diagnose of the students’ competencies and needs during the whole learning process and it aims to improve the students’ performance (Wang 1992; Crono & Snow 1986). A number of studies pointed out that the implementation of adaptive teaching and learning increased the working attitudes, the motivation and the self-responsibility for the own learning processes, the social abilities and the academic performance of students (Wang 1992; Wang & Birch 1984; Wang & Zollers 1990; Waxman, Wang, Anderson & Walberg 1987; Hardy, Jonen, Möller & Stern 2006). Yet, the capability of adaptive education for teaching and learning in heterogeneous groups is primarily discussed on the basis of intervention studies. In these studies predominantly the improvement of particular attitudes and abilities resp. the students’ academic performance was in the focus while the classroom interaction was not taken into account.
Focusing the classroom interaction, I am interested in the relation of the teachers’ abilities to create adaptive learning offers within individualized environments and the students’ abilities to use these opportunities for their own learning processes. I assume that both, the teachers’ and students’ abilities or competencies (Weinert 2001) are to conceptualize as generic structures that consists partly of theoretical knowledge, e.g. pedagogical content knowledge, domain-specific knowledge, knowledge of teaching resp. learning methods and strategies etc., and implicit knowledge, e.g. teaching and learning routines (cf. Neuweg 2001; Martens & Asbrand 2009). In classroom-interaction teaching and learning competencies interact in a complex way so that matching of teaching and learning often emerges situational. Through interaction analyses I try to describe under which conditions these matching emerge and in how far they are a resource for learning processes.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bohnsack, R. (2010). Documentary method and group discussions. In R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, & W. Weller (Eds.), Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international education research (pp. 99-124). Opladen & Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers. Bohnsack, R., Pfaff, N., & Weller, W. (2010). Reconstructive research and Documentary Method in Brazilian and German educational science: An introduction. In R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, & W. Weller (Eds.), Qualitative analysis and Documentary Method in international education research (pp. 7-40). Opladen & Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers. Corno, L. & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Ed.) (pp. 605-629). New York: McMillan. Hardy, I., Jonen, A., Möller, K., & Stern, E. (2006). Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students’ understanding of „floating and sinking“. The Journal of Educational Psychology 98(2), 307-326. Martens, M. & Asbrand, B. (2009). Rekonstruktion von Handlungswissen und Handlungs¬kompetenz – auf dem Weg zu einer qualitativen Kompetenzforschung. Zeitschrift für qualitative Forschung 10 (2), 201-222. Martens, M., Petersen, D., & Asbrand, B. (2014). Die Materialität von Lernkultur. Methodische Überlegungen zur dokumentarischen Analyse von Unterrichtsvideografien. In R. Bohnsack, A. Baltruschat, B. Fritzsche, & M. Wagner-Willi (Hrsg), Dokumentarische Film und Videointerpretation. Methodologie und Forschungspraxis (pp. 179-203). Opladen: Barbara Budrich. Neuweg, G.-H. (2002). Lehrerhandeln und Lehrerbildung im Lichte des Konzeptes des impliziten Wissens. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 48(1), 10-29. Wang, M. C. (1992). Adaptive education strategies: Building on diversity. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing. Wang, M. C. & Birch, J. W. (1984). Effective spezial education in regular class. Exeptional Children 50(5), 391-398. Wang, M. C. & Zollers, N. J. (1990). Adaptive instruction: An alternative service delivery approach. Remedial and Special Education 11(1), 7-21. Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Anderson, K. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1985). Synthesis of research on the effects of adaptive education. Educational Leadership 43(1), 26-29. Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concepts of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45-56), Seattle: Hogrefe.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.