18 SES 05, Physical Education Teacher Education: Challenges and Future
School Health and Physical Education (HPE) can be an important cornerstone of producing physically active and healthy people that will contribute to the wellbeing of society as a whole. However, our definition and understanding of what it means to be ‘physically active’ and ‘healthy’ has for some time now and continues to be under constant (re)negotiation. In recent times, this has, for instance, been highlighted by HPE curricula moving from scientific/physiological concepts of physical activity and health to more socially-critical perspectives. Indeed, in New Zealand and Australia (along with other countries such as Sweden) HPE teachers are under similar obligations as stated by the curriculum documents to teach from a socially-critical perspective (MacDonald & Kirk, 1999). Physical education is defined within the New Zealand curriculum (Ministry of Education, 2007) as a learning area that “fosters critical thinking andaction and enables students to understand the role and significance of physical activity for individuals and society” (p. 23).
Despite these clear messages about the importance of adopting a socially-critical pedagogy in HPE, traditional notions of physical activity, bodies and health are being reproduced both within Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) programmes and the school subject itself (MacDonald et al., 2002). These traditional notions, for instance, include: a shared passion for various sports (Rossi, Sirna & Tinning, 2008); a scientific/physiological view of the body (Matanin & Collier, 2003); and biological assumptions about sex differences (Kirk, 2002).
Our interest in this topic is based on a shared belief that it is not only knowledge about but also ‘how HPE teachers think and feel about education, social justice, physical activity, bodies and health that will be their most important graduate attribute’ (Tinning, 2012, p. 224, italics in original). Specifically, which also is the focus of this paper, we are interested in social justice and socio-critical perspectives and in particular the theory of critical pedagogy as a way of transforming HPE and, indeed, PETE. For us, critical pedagogy has emancipation and social justice as its central aims, and it enables people to obtain the knowledge, skills and power necessary to gain a greater degree of control over their individual and collective lives. It is about identifying inequalities and empowering individuals and groups to take social action to achieve change (Apple, 2003; McLaren, 2003).
The majority of writing to date has focused on theoretical knowledge and documenting critical pedagogical approaches in PETE (see e.g. Kirk, 1986; Fernandez-Balboa, 1995; Macdonald & Brooker, 1999; Hickey, 2001) and there have been few studies conducted which offer insight into how HPE teachers attempt to apply critical pedagogy in schools. This paper reports on one part of a larger collaborative project which focused on how PETE graduates think and feel about, and enact socially-critical perspectives as ‘beginning’ teachers (up to 2 years) or as ‘fully registered’ teachers (after 2 years).
Apple, M.W. (2003). The State and the Politics of Knowledge. New York: Routledge Falmer. Fernandez-Balboa, J. M. (1995). Reclaiming physical education in higher education through critical pedagogy. Quest, 47, 91-114. Hickey, C. (2001). I feel enlightened now, but...: The limits to the pedagogical translation of critical discourses in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 227-246. Kirk, D. (1986). A critical pedagogy for teacher education: Toward an inquiry-oriented approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 230-246. Kirk, David (2002). Physical education: a gendered history. I: Penney, Dawn (red.) Gender and Physical Education. Contemporary issues and future directions. London: Routledge, pp. 24–37. MacDonald, D., & Brooker, R. (1999). Articulating a critical pedagogy in physical education teacher education. Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 5(1), 51-64. MacDonald, D., & Kirk, D. (1999). Pedagogy, the body and Christian identity. Sport, Education and Society, 4(2), 131-142. MacDonald, D, Hunter, L, Carlson, T & Penney, D (2002). Teacher Knowledge and the Disjunction between School Curricula and Teacher Education. Asia-Pasific Journal of Teacher Education 30, pp. 259–275. MacDonald, D., & Kirk, D. (1999). Pedagogy, the body and Christian identity. Sport, Education and Society, 4(2), 131–142. Matanin, M & Collier, C (2003). Longitudinal Analysis of Preservice Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 22, pp. 153–168. McLaren, P. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media Limited. Rossi, T, Sirna, K & Tinning, R (2008). Becoming a health and physical education (HPE) teacher: Student teacher ‘Performances’ in the physical education subject department office. Teacher and Teaching Education 24, pp. 1029–1040. Tinning, R. (2012). A socially critical HPE (aka physical education) and the challenge for teacher education. In Barry Down and John Smyth (Eds.), Critical voices in teacher education: teaching for social justice in conservative times (pp. 223–238). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Some networks have already started to plan their chairperson(s).
But at the moment chairpersons are only pencilled in, as we will still need to check for time conflicts between presentation and chairing duties. EERA office will work on this in due course and then officially let chairpersons know about their chairing duties.
Meanwhile, thank you for your patience.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.