The Emotional Knowledge Of Pre-service Teachers: A School Placement Intervention
Author(s):
Eamonn Pugh (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-08
17:15-18:45
Room:
209.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Aileen Kennedy

Contribution

How could emotional aspects of teaching be addressed explicitly within pre-service teacher training programme? The question was prompted by an ‘an elephant in the room’ – an obvious issue that was ignored.  It drew upon decades as a school-based and then university-based teacher, from the perspective of both my own teaching and supporting beginning teachers. This is practitioner research by a university-based teacher educator, a doctoral research project addressing a need for improved practice.

There has been long-standing word-wide debate about the interaction of affect and cognition, of feeling and thinking. This is part of any research into emotions and teaching. Though the scarcity of such research was bemoaned, researchers have been investigating teachers’ emotions in a variety of educational contexts (Van Veen, K, and Lasky, S, 2005). Nonetheless more research and theorisation on teachers’ emotions is needed to gather understandings of how emotions influence teaching (Shutz, P and Zembylas, M, 2011) particularly to inform pre-service training programmes place little emphasis on relationships between teachers’ emotions and teaching practice (Sutton, R, Mudrey-Camino, R and Knight C, 2009).  
Most research applying the populist concept of ‘emotional intelligence’ to teaching uses the abilities-based model of Mayer and Salovey or Goleman’s mixed model of traits. However this enquiry recognises the ongoing lack of consensus around whether emotional intelligence is a valid or helpful construct (Matthews G, Zeidner M and Roberts R, 2012) especially in pre-service teacher training (Hawkey, 2006).

The theoretical framework constructed is ‘emotional knowledge, informed by linking three paradigms. Shulman’s work on knowledge needed by teachers, specifically the idea of pedagogical content knowledge (1983) is viewed together with Mortiboys’ claim that effective teaching is a mix of emotional aspects, what to teach and how to teach it (2011). This merged into a postulation that the emotional aspects of teaching can be explored as a body of knowledge.

Despite a trend across the EU towards competence-based teaching (encapsulated in the European Framework of Key Competences), the term 'competence' can have connotations of mediocrity in the UK (Eraut, M, 1994). Goleman’s inventory of emotional competencies (Goleman, 1998) was seen as valuable but a misnomer. Described as learned capacities to improve effective performance at work, these competencies have new meaning here as knowledge associated with emotions. This emotional knowledge of teaching is defined here as the trainee’s knowledge of their emotional experiences, experiences in 18 contexts derived from Goleman. Usually presented in a 4-cluster matrix of awareness/management and personal/social categories, these are:

Self-Awareness: emotional awareness, accurate self-assessment and self-confidence

Self-Management: emotional self-control, transparency, adaptability, achievement, initiative and optimism

Social Awareness: empathy, organizational awareness and service orientation

Relationship Management: developing others, inspirational leadership, change catalyst, influence, conflict management and teamwork/collaboration

A new question emerged: What role does emotional knowledge have in developing trainee teachers?

The enquiry was now an empirical test of a new theoretical framework. This phenomenon (emotional knowledge) is a social construction. An interpretative approach was used, ensuring that findings captured the intended meaning for the participants. To avoid bias and socially-desirable responses in my interpretations, the data collection used a mix of instruments. As well as prompting explicit consideration of emotional knowledge, these allowed trainees to reflect on any aspect of their teaching, opening the possibility of sharing tacit emotional knowledge through inferences.

 [EP1]565/600

Method

The participant voices were those of postgraduate trainee teachers themselves, their school-based mentors on school placements and university-based tutors. Tutors made moderation visits to schools during trainees’ school placements with their visits usually including a formal observation of the trainee teaching, a role which mentors undertook several times on each placement. Numerical and narrative data was collected during and after the trainees’ one year programme. At the end of the trainees’ 4-week beginning placement, they were given the emotional knowledge framework and asked to firstly assess their own emotional knowledge and secondly rate the confidence with which they made those assessments. They used a four point scale for both and submitted by online survey tool with 71% of the cohort responding (n=84/119). Eleven of the cohort volunteered to continue participation through their 5-week developing placement, allowed their tutor to observe the emotion knowledge of their teaching (using the framework). Data collected from the observation included the tutor feedback and trainee responses. Additionally trainees wrote an open-ended blog, confidential to trainee and researcher, about any placement issue. The trainees also shared weekly written reviews and an end-of-placement report from their mentor about their teaching. Both of these were ecologically valid - expected of all trainees and involving no extra work – as well as possibly giving access to unconscious emotional knowledge. In a research development workshop after this placement, discussion with the trainees centred on the research as an iterative process and if or how it should progress into their 9-week final placement. Resulting from this, the observation of emotional knowledge was this time undertaken by the trainees’ mentors, feedback from observer and trainee was again collected, as were the end-of-placement reports. Data collection concluded four months later with individual semi-structured interviews of the former trainees, now in-service teachers, and their mentors from final placement. Though this dialogue they looked back at the emotional knowledge intervention from new perspectives. The key features of the data analysis were triangulation of findings from the numerical and narrative data, low inference descriptive labelling and a high inference pattern coding for each category of emotional knowledge and emergent themes.

Expected Outcomes

The iterative nature of the research resulted in a change to the data collection when trainees questioned whether the observing tutor knew them well enough to assess these sensitive aspects of practice, instead suggesting that observation by their mentors could be more valid and useful. Analysis indicates emotional knowledge to be a propositional and procedural construct, something that could be recognised in practice. Despite some variation in trainee understanding of the categories, there were similarities in the extent and to which the data showed understanding in action. For example, 86% of trainees understood ‘transparency’ as acting in accordance with their values and were also confident in their self-assessments - which on average were nearer ‘very good’ than ‘good’. Placement reflections too suggested high levels of congruency between trainee behaviour and eschewed values, such as this weekly review comment: “I model the behaviour I wish to see in the children, praising good behaviour and helpful and kind children. I take time to write personal, accurate and useful feedback to the children so they really see why it is worthwhile to try hard in each piece of work”. A mentor report on this trainee referred to “professional and conscientious throughout the placement demonstrating a willing and enthusiastic attitude at all times”. The emergent findings suggest that emotional knowledge is valued highly by the participants, that it is integral to trainees’ behaviour management and that it is strongly linked to mutual respect and trust between trainee/pupils and trainee/mentor. These embryonic findings will be discussed more fully at conference. My interim conclusions are that emotional knowledge is part of being a teacher and that it is not fixed. The significance for providers of teacher training is that explicitly addressing emotional knowledge may accelerate trainee progress.

References

Eraut, M (1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, Routledge Farmer Goleman, G (1998) Working With Emotional Intelligence in Wolff, B (2005) Emotional Competence Inventory, Hay Acquisitions Company Inc. Hawkey, K (2006) Emotional intelligence and mentoring in pre-service teacher education: a literature review, Mentoring & Tutoring, 14 (2) Matthews G, Zeidner M and Roberts R, (2012), Emotional intelligence: A Promise Unfulfilled? Japanese Psychological Association 54 (2), 105-127 Mortiboys, A. (2011) Teaching with Emotional Intelligence (2nd edition), Routledge. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 Shutz P and Zembylas M (2011) ‘Advances in teacher emotion research: the impact on teachers' lives’, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag Sutton, R, Mudrey-Camino, R and Knight C (2009) Teachers’ Emotion Regulation and Class Management, Theory into Practice 48, 130-137 Van Veen, K, and Lasky, S, (2005) Emotions as a lens to explore teacher identity and change: Zembylas, M (2007) Emotional ecology: The intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching, Teaching and Teacher Education, 23 (4)

Author Information

Eamonn Pugh (presenting / submitting)
University of Cumbria
Institute of Education
Carlisle

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.