Paradoxes in School-Led Teacher Education Policy in England: A Partnership's Response to 'School Direct'
Author(s):
Simon Thompson (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2015
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2015-09-09
09:00-10:30
Room:
325.Oktatóterem [C]
Chair:
Rasa Nedzinskaite

Contribution

This paper reports on the impact of a major policy direction in initial teacher education designed by the UK government to foster a school led system in teacher preparation. Drawing upon a range of case studies it examines how one established Initial Teacher Education partnership between a University and over 100 secondary and primary schools has responded to the policy initiative called School Direct. This new qualifying route into teaching significantly shifts ownership of initial teacher preparation away from higher education institutions to schools and academies where responsibility for recruitment, selection, training, assessment and subsequent employment is, in theory, driven by the needs of schools. It examines views on the distinctive nature of this training route, its advantages and challenges as well as perceptions on what impact School Direct will have on schools and teacher education in the near future.

As such the paper addresses four key research questions:
1. What are the ways in which School Direct might be seen as distinctive from other ITE options?
2. What are the perceived advantages and benefits of School Direct to different stakeholders?
3. Equally, what are the disadvantages and challenges of School Direct to different stakeholders?
4. What is the anticipated impact and development of School Direct on schools and existing teacher education systems?

The study is situated within a context of official and informal discourses on education policy which are enriched and characterised by those striving to capture its scale, shape and dynamism; Husband’s (2012) vivid assessment of change as “seismic” captures much of the impact of recent educational transformation. This is particularly the case in conceptions of how to prepare beginning teachers both in the UK (Furlong, 2013) and increasingly across Europe (Caena, 2014; Zuljan, and Vogrinc, 2011) and indeed across the world (Darling-Hammond, 2012). Established models of teacher education which privilege reflection (Schon, 1983) , research informed practice (Burn and Mutton, 2013) or the acquisition of professional knowledge (Eraut, 1996) have been challenged by a re-emergence of those who argue teaching is a craft (Leinhardt, 1990) best learnt through apprenticeship (Gove, 2012) and School Direct can be seen as a determined attempt to embed this practice (Clare and Pitfield, 2013). Yet there is evidence to suggest that this particular view of a school led model only reinforces the accelerated direction of teacher education initiated in the last century (Whitty, 2014).

The study is considered within a situated learning framework, recognising and testing the ways in which the development of and learning by beginning teachers is informed by Lave and Wenger’s theory of legitimate peripheral participation.

Method

This study draws upon initial survey data from different participants (beginning teachers, school based trainers, school leaders and university tutors) working or training in or with partnership schools. An online questionnaire was used to identify common approaches, experiences and concerns. Five schools were then approached as embedded case studies (Yin, 2009) and purposive sampling led to subsequent interviews with school leaders, school based trainers and School Direct trainees which added richer qualitative insights and depth. Interviews were analysed drawing upon a constructivist conceptualisation of grounded theory (Charmaz, 2005) to identify themes within and across different school contexts as well as specific contrasts. This study was carried out following a successful peer-led ethical review process. Confidentiality was assured and all names and institutional identifiers have been removed from examples and interview extracts to protect anonymity.

Expected Outcomes

Key contextual features of each school’s approach are highlighted in relation to preferred ways of training beginning teachers and how (far) to draw upon and value established partnership practices and expertise. The experience of the partnership reveals that where a University has long valued and developed the distinctive contribution of school stakeholders then a richer and sustainable approach to teacher education can emerge and strengthen. Equally the study identifies how the ongoing and all pervasive nature of other changes in education undermine some attempts to take more ownership of teacher preparation and leave some school stakeholders disillusioned, disconnected and desperate for the re-establishment of traditional models of teacher training. In some cases it illustrates how some of the dominant discourse surrounding a new policy can be realised, corrupted or ignored when convenient by tutors, teachers and beginning teachers and how the ongoing narrative of a school-led system of teacher preparation presented by policy makers is far removed from the realities in practice.

References

Burn, K., and Mutton, T. (2013). Review of research-informed clinical practice in teacher education, paper submitted to the BERA-RSA Inquiry. London: BERA/RSA. Caena, F (2014) Comparative glocal perspectives on European teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 1, pp. 106 - 122 Clare, K and Pitfield, M. (2013) School Direct: a hastily constructed model or a systematically designed campaign?, Forum, 55, 3, pp. 447-460. Darling-Hammond, L and Lieberman, A (Eds). (2012) Teacher Education around the World: Changing Policies and Practices. Teacher Quality and School Development, Routledge, Florence DfE (2011) Training our next generation of outstanding teachers: Implementation plan. Department for Education Florian, L and Pantic, N. (2013) Learning to teach: Exploring the distinctive contribution of higher education to teacher education. Higher Education Academy Report Furlong, J. (2013) The policy context: The changing nature of initial teacher education. Research Intelligence. 120, 9 - 10. Furlong, J, G Whitty, C Whiting, S Miles, L Barton (2001), Teacher education in transition: re-forming professionalism?, Teaching and Teacher Education. 17, 5, pp. 527-546 Hodgson, J. (2013) Surveying the wreckage: the professional response to changes to initial teacher training in the UK. English in Education, 48, 1, pp. 7 - 25 Hordern, J. (2014) The Logic and Implications of School-based Teacher Formation. British Journal of Education Studies. 62, 3, pp. 231 – 248 Leinhardt, G, (1990), Capturing craft knowledge in teaching, Educational Researcher, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 18-25 Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith Zuljan, M V and Vogrinc, J (2011) European Dimensions of Teacher Education–Similarities and Differences, University of Ljubljana Wenger, E, (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Whitty, G. (2014) Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the ‘University Project’ in education. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 4 Winch, C., Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2013). The Contribution of Educational Research to Teachers’ Professional Learning Philosophical Understanding. Paper submitted to the BERA-RSA Inquiry. London: BERA/RSA. Yin, R, (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Fourth Edition), Sage Publications, Los Angeles.

Author Information

Simon Thompson (presenting / submitting)
University of Sussex
Brighton

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.