Session Information
03 SES 14 A, Teachers Innovating Higher Education Curricula
Symposium
Contribution
In 2008, and supported by the national government, Dutch Universities started with the development and implementation of honor programs on a larger scale. The honor programs were developed with the dual aim to: a) challenge excellent and motivated students, and b) create an organizational culture of excellence to benefit all students (Sirius Expertcomissie, 2013). Honor programs were seen as a way to facilitate lecturers to develop and try out new and innovative teaching methods for the honor students, that could later on also be transferred to regular educational programs (van der Rijst & Wolfensberger, 2014). The renewing character of honor programs is in line with previous studies that show how lecturers state to provide ‘other types’ of education to honor students than regular ones (Wolfensberger, 2012). The current study aims to investigate lecturers’ choices underlying developed honor programs to find out if these lead to new or innovative teaching methods in the perception of lecturers in regular programs. Data was collected and analyzed in two steps. First, semi-structured interviews (N=14; all disciplines) were carried out to obtain insight into the honor programs developed by lecturers. Based on the interview transcripts and the literature, rich vignettes of innovative education were developed (Bodycott & Walker, 2000). Second, based on the vignettes 14 teachers who are not involved by the developed honor programs, were interviewed about the innovative character of the education developed for the honor programs. The first results show that the learning materials can vary to a large extent between the various honor programs, but that they are often shaped by the external environment, and often include networking activities. Furthermore, the didactical approach and the aimed learning processes of students is mostly similar between programs. During the next two months the second phase of the study will be carried out.
References
Bodycott, P., & Walker, A. (2000). Teaching Abroad: Lessons learned about inter-cultural understanding for teachers in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 79-94. Rijst, van der R., & Wolfensberger, M. (2014). Docentopvattingen over de meerwaarde van honoursonderwijs voor het leren van talentvolle en gemotiveerde studenten [Teachers’ beliefs regarding honor educations’ advantages for the learning of talented and motivated students]. Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs 31/32, 52-65. Sirius Expertcommissie. (2013). Sirius Programma overall auditrapport 2013. Excellentie in het hoger onderwijs: de fase van verankering en verduurzaming. Den Haag: Sirius Programma. Wolfensberger, M. V. C. (2012). Teaching for Excellence. Honors Pedagogies Revealed. (Ph.D), Universiteit Utrecht, Munster.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.