Session Information
22 SES 12 A, Evaluation as a Basis for Policy and Practice in Higher Education: International Perspectives
Symposium
Contribution
Between 2010 and 2014, the Dutch government funded the implementation of multiple honour programs in many schools and univeristies. Now the governmental funding has ended and the results are evaluated as start of a new phase in which the implemented programs are being preservered. In the last year, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences has evaluated the effects of the implementation of honour programs. This study presents the results on the evaluation of the acceptance of excellence among the lecturers in Amsterdam UAS. This study is based on questionnaire data gathered among lecturers in Amsterdam UAS in February 2015. The design combines two existing models. First the notion of acceptance of excellence is framed by the Technology Acceptance Model (Griffioen & De Jong, 2014; Teo, 2009). Based on this model, the expectation is that the lecturers’ perceptions on excellence (new scale), and their self-efficacy on excellence (scale based on Bandura, 2006) will influence their attitudes (scale based on Van der Linden, Bakx, Ros, Beijaard, & Vermeulen, 2012) and behavior (new scale) towards the excellence programs. The second model adresses the organisational influences on the lecturers’ perceptions (based on Geijsel, Sleegers, Van den Berg, & Kelchtermans, 2001; Griffioen & De Jong, 2014). The idea of this model is that the direct manager can influence the culture and structure of the organisation and hence influence how teachers accept – in this case – excellence and honour programs. The data analysis will be done from March onward through full structural equation modelling (Muthén & Muthén, 2007). The results will yield new insights in the organisational influence on lecturers’ perceptions of an innovation in higher education settings, and will be used for adaptation of institutional policy intentions and actions.
References
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). USA: Information Age Publishing. Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Van den Berg, R., & Kelchtermans, G. (2001). Conditions Fostering the Implementation of Large-Scale Innovation Programs in Schools: Teachers' Perspectives. Education Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 130-166. Griffioen, D. M. E., & De Jong, U. (2014). Implementing Research in Higher Professional Education: Factors that Influence Lecturers’ Perceptions. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus Users Guide (5 ed.). Los Angeles: CA: Muthén & Muthén. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computer & Education, 52(2), 302-312. Van der Linden, W., Bakx, A., Ros, A., Beijaard, D., & Vermeulen, M. (2012). Student Teachers' Development of a Positive Attitude towards Research and Research Knowledge and Skills. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 401-419.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.