Student’s Perspectives on Challenges in Teacher Education
Author(s):
Margareta Aspán (presenting / submitting) Ylva Ståhle (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 01 B, Student Teachers Voices and Perceptions

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-23
13:15-14:45
Room:
NM-Theatre N
Chair:
ML White

Contribution

In Sweden, the content and the assignment of the teacher education have been scrutinized since the latest efforts to strengthen the teacher profession were made through reforms in 2001 and in 2011 (The Swedish Government Bill 2009/10:89). This reforms have been seen as ways to reverse the trend of negative results in the schools’ PISA-tests, as well as to endorse the status of the teacher profession in a more general way. Internationally it is said that the “quality” of the teachers has an important impact on pupils’ success in school (Darling-Hammond, Bransford, & LePage, 2007).

 

The content of teacher education programmes is regulated in the system of qualifications (i.e. Higher Education Ordinance 1993:100, appendix 2). The different qualifications from the latest reform are also connected to a teacher's certificate, promulgated by the Swedish National Agency for Education, which states ‘in which types of school, which subjects and which years he or she is qualified to teach’. How to organize the content of the teacher education is a matter often discussed; it shifts between universities and can differ in emphasis concerning the content.

We will discuss, out from focus group-interviews made in one specific university in Sweden, how a number of student teachers are experiencing their meeting with the chosen education. Our concern is to present and discuss how new teacher students are experiencing and reason about their first courses in terms of challenges to master. We want to shed light on how they face the meeting with the academy and how they see that the introductory courses relate to the teacher profession.

In our analysis of the novice teacher students’ statements we draw on enculturation. The concept describes how people become full participants in various practices (Roth et al, 2005). Different pedagogical practices create opportunities to acquire knowledge, norms and values embedded in the contexts. Through participation and engagement in teaching and educational activities the students get the opportunity to be enculturated into different practices both at campus and in the vocational training. To become competent in these practices, the new students need to appropriate the rules and tools that are the core for managing the practice in an acceptable way (Lave & Wenger 1991).

We consider in our study a certain teacher education, as a specific learning practice to which the students are supposed to enculture to be able to be fully participant and skilled. To be enculturated in teacher education is to acquire strategies to create knowledge, to practice intellectual and physical tools together with other students, lecturers and teachers/preschool teachers. Students are expected to interpret and understand the special rules enclosed in academic studies and teacher's duties. To understand why students may have difficulties in e.g. implementing tasks it is valuable for lectures to study the experiences students need to use the tools as expected. For those lacking the experience of the tools, the tasks seem incomprehensible.

 Studies of educational content, in curriculum theoretical context, show that learning is not just about what is written in the curriculum and official documents. It is also about the content of teaching in terms of the lived, realized or experienced curriculum. This is described as aspects of the concept of the hidden curriculum (Jackson, 1968/1990). Jackson says that the hidden curriculum is about norms and values that are implicit, and students must learn to handle them to get through school in a satisfactory manner. The hidden curriculum is primarily related to things students learn, not related to the subject content e.g. waiting, talking and writing in certain manners, and to do things that are perceived as meaningless.

Method

Teacher students from one university in Sweden were interviewed in focus groups. Nineteen students, (ten women and nine men) from three different teacher education programs were participating. Student teachers from different programs are studying together the first semester, which means that all students read the same courses and attend the same lectures and seminars. The discussions were organized in three groups on basis of each respective program: high school teacher program, compulsory school (k-9) program and preschool teacher program. The group discussions were conducted at the premises of the university 2013 and lasted for two hours. The students had been contacted by lectures at the university and accepted to share their experiences of their first term of teacher education. During the interview seventeen students were in their second semester and two in their fourth. The analyses of the transcribed texts focused on how the students experienced their first semester in teacher education. When reanalysing the material for a deeper understanding on their experiences their conceptions of challenges to handle crystallised. We were here looking for what was regarded as seen as difficulties in being a student in teacher education and how they were able to cope that. The purpose was to interpret and develop possible ways of understanding their experiences, and we approached this by using the concept of enculturation. Finely, we described and named the qualitatively different concepts that have been discerned. The conceptions are named and related to each other in such a way that the conception form an ‘outcome space’ (cf. Marton, 2015).

Expected Outcomes

The results from the analysis provides a picture of three qualitatively different perceived challenges; interpretation, identification, interaction. The students feel that they have to interpret the (unspoken) expectations through being in different educational settings, reflecting on his/her identity as student and becoming a teacher, and developing his or her social capacities through both group work and work placement. A strong belief among students is that there are simple explanations for why the content in teacher education is designed in the way it is. They want lectures to explain how different parts of the education are linked. They think that the teachers know but they do not share that logic with the students. A perception among students is that knowledge is something transferable and the lectures can tell students how theories can be used in practice or explain complex concepts through simple explanations. The students ask for methods and manual works that are transparent and therefor possible to appropriate by imitation. The new students have not experienced that appropriating new intellectual tools is a gradual process in which students progressively acquire increasing experience of how they can be used in a productive way in different situations. New insights are also developing when students see new possibilities in the tools they master (Lave & Wenger 1991). The students expressed what they felt were challenges to deal with in their studies. They had to interpret expectations, reflect on their identity as a teacher student and as a future teacher, handle stress and feelings of anxiety, and develop social capacities. The students had focus on the enculturing to the hidden curriculum and the lectures on the content in the courses and expected outcomes. The students have to relate and handle the hidden curriculum (Jackson 1961/1990).

References

Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., and LePage, P. (2007). Introduction. In Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, National Academy of Education. (pp. 1-39) The Higher Education Ordinance [Högskoleförordning] 1993:100. Jackson, P. (1968/1990). Life in classrooms. New York/London: Teachers College Press. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate, peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. London, UK: Routledge. Roth, M.W., Hwang, S.W., Goulart, M.I.M., and Lee, J.Y. (2005). Participation, learning and identity. Dialectial perspectives. Berlin: Lehmans Media. The Swedish Government bill 2009/10:89. Bäst i klassen – en ny lärarutbildning. [Best in the class – a new teacher education]. The Swedish National Agency for Education, Certification of teachers and preschool teachers. http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/andra-sprak-och-lattlast/in-english/teacher-certification

Author Information

Margareta Aspán (presenting / submitting)
Stockholm university
Department of child and youth studies
Stockholm
Ylva Ståhle (presenting)
Stockholm University
Dep of education
Stockholm

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.