Session Information
04 SES 07 A, Transition and Dropout From and After School
Paper Session
Contribution
In educational situations where expectations and learning requirements get higher, students with reading and mathematical difficulties experience many challenges. Students have to compensate for poor reading/mathematical skills with harder work that result in longer workdays and increased pressure, which, in turn, can affect further educational choices e.g. by choosing shorter educational tracks (Goldberg, Higgins, Raskind, & Herman, 2003). Over time, without adequate support, learning difficulties can induce also secondary problems such as poor academic self-concept, and difficulties in maintaining a positive attitude and high motivation especially in demanding learning situations (Levine & Nourse, 1998; McNulty, 2003). Students with reading and mathematical difficulties are also at greater risk for dropping out of school than those without learning difficulties but clearly, dropout from education does not happen suddenly, it is more like a process of gradual disengagement that has been going on for several years before dropout itself occurs (Bear, Kortering, & Braziel, 2006; Kortering & Christenson, 2009). The role of existing educational support system at basic education and after that for staying on educational track is in our research interest in the present study. Namely, findings from earlier studies and meta-analyses indicate that, as a whole, special education fails to prepare youths with learning difficulties to compete for positions in secondary education and working life (Newman, Wagner, Cameto, & Knokey, 2009; Reid, Gonzalez, Nordness, Trout, & Epstein, 2004).
The participants of the study were Finnish adolescents (N = 597, 304 females, 293 males; mean age 15.9) who were followed for five years after graduation from comprehensive school. We wanted to find out, 1) what is the role of part-time special education given to students during the schooldays at basic education (received at grades 1-2, grades 3-6 and grades 7-9) predicting reading and mathematical difficulties at the end of basic education and further, 2) the role of educational support received during secondary education (grades 10-12) in predicting and explaining three different life situations, namely the delayed graduation of secondary education, the short educational career or the situation, where the participants are not in education, employment or training (NEET-situation).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bear, G. G., Kortering, L. J., & Braziel, P. (2006). School completers and noncompleters with learning disabilities: Similarities in academic achievement and perceptions of self and teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 293-300. Goldberg, R. J., Higgins, E. L., Raskind, M. H., & Herman, K. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 222–236. Holopainen, L., Kairaluoma, L., Nevala, J., Ahonen, T., & Aro, M. (2004). Lukivaikeuksien seulontatesti nuorille ja aikuisille [Dysleksia screening test for youth and adults]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino. Ikäheimo, H., Putkonen, H., & Voutilainen, E. (2002). MAKEKO: Matematiikan keskeisen oppiaineksen kokeet luokille 1–9 [Mathematical skill tests for grades 1–9]. Helsinki: Opperi. Kortering, L. J., & Christenson, S. (2009). Engaging students in school and learning: The real deal for school completion. Exceptionality, 17, 5–15. Levine, P., & Nourse, S. W. (1998). What follow-up studies say about postschool life for young men and women with learning disabilities: A critical look at the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(3), 212-233. Maughan, B. (1995). Long-term outcomes of developmental reading problems. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 36, 357–371. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User’s guide. (Sixth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., & Knokey, A.-M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Retrievedfrom www.nlts2.org/ reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf Reid, R., Gonzalez, J. E., Nordness, P. E., Trout, A., & Epstein, M. H. (2004). A meta-analysis of the academic status of students with emotional/behavioral disturbance. The Journal of Special Education, 38(3), 130–143.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.