Internal and External Collaboration Forms as Internal Capacities for School Development - principals and teachers´ views in three Swedish schools
Author(s):
Conny Björkman (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

01 SES 07 B, Approaches to Middle Leadership in Northern European Countries

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-24
17:15-18:45
Room:
OB-E2.18
Chair:
Conny Björkman

Contribution

This study is a part of the Swedish research and development project “The best regional school system in the world, 2013-2015”.The partners in the project were Mid Sweden University, three main companies in two regions in the middle part of Sweden and three schools (one grade 1 -5, one grade 1-9 and one upper secondary school). Each school was connected to one company during the project period. The overall goals for the project were to raise student results and to develop the schools internal capacities for school development; collaboration forms, staff development and leadership (both the principal leadership and the teacher leadership). These internal capacities for school development, has in previous research been found to be important for principals and teachers, as a collective, within a certain school context, if they are to perform well in order to create readiness for development, as well as to handle and lead the development  process in their specific school context (Björkman, 2008).

Focus in this study was on one of the internal development capacities; Internal and external collaboration forms. The aim of this study was to capture, analyse and compare the principals´ and teachers´ views of the internal and external collaboration forms in the three schools, at the beginning and at the end of the three year project. The research question, captured by individual interviews, with both principals and teachers in the three schools was: How do you collaborate in your school and with the world outside the school house? The principal´s and teacher´s  views of their internal and external collaboration forms, were used as the unit for analysis to capture different modalities in order to understand, compare and communicate what was decided (the school  structure), and the realization of the decisions (the school culture). Views were here understood as overlapping principles for how we interpret and evaluate the world (Zetterström, 1988). The principal´s and the teacher´s views were analysed in the same model, developed for analysis, using the theoretical concepts of structure and culture, referring to the work of Bernstein (2000). Structure refers to the division of labour in a school. That is the power to decide about, in this study the internal and external collaboration forms in the school, and where it is positioned and exercised in the school. The culture refers in this case to the distribution of work in a school. This is the modes of control about the internal and external collaboration forms in the school and at what position in the school system. The structure and culture of a school can be described, theoretically, through four different positions of understanding in a local school system: the political and administrative position, the principal position, the teaching team position and the position of the individual teacher (Björkman, 2008). Next step for me, as a researcher, was to try to find the answers to what is the critical structural unit in the individual interview, and where is that critical structural unit positioned, in relation to internal and external collaboration forms in each school. The question of how the critical structural unit in the interview was realized, and where this realization takes place, was dealt with in the same way. Different combinations of the structure and culture of internal and external collaboration forms were then considered as qualitatively precise view types of the principals and teachers views on internal and external collaboration forms (Björkman, 2008).

Method

The empirical material for this study was collected through identical, individual, open, 45 minutes long interviews, with the principal and 3-6 teachers, representing different levels in each of the three schools in the project. The first interviews took place at the three schools, and were conducted by me during the first year of the project period, and the final interviews were conducted by me in the three schools at the end of the project period, in May/June 2015. The process of method follows the theoretical outline above, using the view-types developed by Björkman (2008), based on principal´s and teacher´s views of the structure and culture of collaboration forms, in 24 Swedish secondary school. The view types, according to collaboration forms were: principal distributed team-based collaboration forms (A), where the decisions (the structure) is located to the principal position. The realization of the decisions (the culture) is located to the position of the teaching teams, principal distributed teacher-based collaboration forms (B), where the structure is located to the principal position and the culture is located to the individual teacher position in their subject traditions. (Björkman, 2008). In practice the methodological procedure was that the researcher read the transcriptions of each of the interviews in round one at the beginning of the project and round two at the end of the project. Thereafter the researcher place each principals´ and teachers´ answer about the internal and external collaboration forms, into the corresponding view types, described above. That provide a pattern for each school, concerning the principals´ and teachers´ views of the structure and the culture for collaboration forms as an internal capacity for school development, at the beginning of the project period and at the end of the project period.

Expected Outcomes

The expected outcome is to make it possible for me, as a researcher, to compare the principal´s and teacher´s views on internal and external collaboration forms, in order to outline, interpret and discuss, whether there are any differences and/or similarities, and if so of what kind, between the principals´ and/or teachers´ views of internal and/or external collaboration forms, as an internal capacity for school improvement, in each of the three schools in the project, at the beginning of the project period compared to at the end of the project period.

References

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic control and identity – Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefields Publishers. Björkman, C. (2008). Internal Capacities for School Improvement – Principals´ views in Swedish Secondary Schools. (Doctoral thesis, Umeå University). Zetterström, B.O. (1988). Samhället som föreställning: om studerandes ideologiska formning I fyra högskoleutbildningar. [Society as a notion – On the ideological shaping of students in educational programmes of four different fields of higher education]. (Doctoral thesis, Umeå University).

Author Information

Conny Björkman (presenting / submitting)
Mid Sweden University
Deparment of Education
Härnösand

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.