Typology Of Family Storytellers
Author(s):
Jana Sedlackova (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Poster

Session Information

ERG SES D 01, Interactive Poster Session

Poster Session

Time:
2016-08-22
13:30-15:00
Room:
OB-E1.17 (ALE 1)
Chair:
Saneeya Qureshi

Contribution

This paper adresses reading and telling of fairy tales to preschool children in nowadays multigenerational families. According to the dictionary of literature (Mocná, Peterka et al., 2004, s. 472) a fairy tale means „entertaining, usually prosaic genre of folklore origin with a fantastic story“. It takes place in unknown time and space, good wins, evil is defeated and its characters are either completely kind or mean. Čapek (1971, s. 98) came with a different definition: „A real fairy tale, the fairy tale in its genuine function, is talking in the circle of recipients. It stems from a need to tell and a pleasure to listen.“ He emphasizes, that a fairy tale is rather a communicational action among participants, based on their mutual contact and experience.

The relationship between fairy tales and emergent literacy development is discussed. Both reading as same as telling fairy tales can be considered as methods for developing early literacy. A significant role in this development plays the approach taken by adult narrators. Several recent researchers confirm that parents can influence their childrens' interest in reading by their own approach (Ortiz, Stowe, & Arnold, 2001), especially by their full attention and enthusiasm involved in reading (Kassow, 2006). Communication style, by which they talk to children, contributes not only to the development of cognitive factors of literacy (to which the most of the research attention is directed) but also to the development of social-emotional factors, which can have the same importance for childrens' future lives (Le Poire, 2006). This is because adult narrators change both activities into a family ritual, with the aim of facilitating an experience of mutuality, harmony and family unity.

Thus reading and telling fairy tales can be seen as sociocognitive and in a sort of way intergenerational learning. Educational constructivist Jerome Bruner assumes that all our interpretations come from communication with others. It contains outer interpretations of the world around us and also inner interpretations of ourselves. In this context he emphasizes especially family daily routines with preschool children, which accorrding to him transfer a native language as same as a culture (Bakhurst, & Shanker, 2001). We can say that via reading and telling fairy tales children can construct their meaning and understanding of the world, which a narrator, usually parent or grandparent, presents to them. And merely, in depth, there is also a dimension of constructing understanding among close people, among all those generations involved in the recurring family ritual.

Because a historical evidences mention an important role of old women, knowledgeable and experienced, who liked to share their stories, in relation with telling and reading fairy tales (Možný, 1990), I decided to focus on broader intergenerational families. The main question was: How parents and grandparents from particular intergenerational families perceive their approach in reading and telling fairy tales to the children?

Method

I made a qualitative research based on individual and group semi-structured interviews with parents and grandparents from four multigenerational families, who fulfilled three criteria: their children were a preschool age (defined as 3 to 6 years old), they were in a closer contact with the grandparents' generation (defined by either living in the same household or regular visiting at least on a weekly base) and they confirmed that they read or tell fairy tales to the children. Type of the semi-structured interview was chosen according to possibilities and preferences of participants. Interviews were supplemented by short talks with children and examination of books from home libraries. Participants were chosen by intensive sampling (Hendl, 2012) in which the researcher collects not extreme cases but those who sufficiently manifest examined phenomenon. The research took place in households of parents or grandparents. Collected data were analyzed with use of open coding and systematic comparison (Švaříček, & Šeďová, 2007) of individual statements. Typology of family storytellers, developed through analysis, consists of ideal types (Hendl, 2012), whose aim is to express the researcher's point of view, to which we connect examined evidences. According to this method there is not a need to copy those evidences but rather to reorganize them according to inner similarities. This allows us to interpret the data in terms of a similarity with or a deviation from the ideal type. In my research this means that there are not usually participants with only one approach but their approach rather fit a combination of two in some way complementary approaches. The fact, that investigated families came from my neighbourhood or a snowball of acquaintances (Hendl, 2012) could increase the honesty of their statements and reduce potential effort to overestimate their engagement related to reading and telling. In question on potential generalization, my findings have necessarily probabilistic nature - although we would like to assume that the results could be similar in other intergenerational families with similar characteristics, for this evidence another quantitative research is needed.

Expected Outcomes

The results reveal that however parents and grandparents identify various advantages which reading and telling fairy tales have for their children, for themselves these activities are more about precious quality time spent with them. It means that they perceive reading and telling rather as a valued time of togetherness with children than a form of child education. On the other hand, we need to consider, that most of participants do not have a tertiary education and in higher educated intergenerational families could be the sense of education more noticeable. The research identifies four different approaches to these activities that adult narrators adopt. Each type finds slightly different meaning in reading and telling fairy tales to children, which emerges in different forms of their rituals: (i) a nurse who perceive them as a nature, interested mainly in contact with the child, motivated by a wish to be a good (grand)parent, (ii) a teacher who sees them rather as a need and potential for childs' overall development and basics for later learning to read, wishing to be a mediator of that knowledge, (iii) a sage who takes them as a pleasant duty and emphasises the importance of social and moral educative aspects, (iv) a jester who accentuates humour and entertainment. These approaches seem to be gender- and role-specific. Approach of a nurse has been adopted by women, a teacher mostly by parents, a sage mostly by grandparents and a jester has been a domain of men. Comparing to theoretical evidences, role of the main storytellers moved in history from grandparents to parents, which on one hand increases demands on parenting but on the other hand creates a potential for more frequent intergenerational cooperation. From a practical perspective these results can be inspirative for those, who read or tell fairy tales to children.

References

Bakhurst, D., & Shanker, S. (2001). Jerome Bruner: Language, culture and self. London: SAGE Publications. Baxter, L., & Braithwaite, D. (2006). Family rituals. In L. Turner, & R. West, The family communication sourcebook (s. 259-277). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (Ed.). (2005, in press). The expanded family life cycle: individual, family, and social perspectives. New York: Pearson Allyn & Bacon. Čapek, K. (1971). Masryas, čili, Na okraj literatury (1919-1931). Praha: Československý spisovatel. Černoušek, M. (1990). Děti a svět pohádek. Praha: Albatros. Frean, A. (2000). Busy parents bid goodnight to bedtime stories. The Times, s. 13. Hendl, J. (2012). Kvalitativní výzkum: základní teorie, metody a aplikace. Praha: Portál. Cheal, D. (2002). Sociology of family life. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Kassow, D. (2006). Parent-child shared book reading quality versus quantity of reading interactions between parents and young children. Talaris Research Institute, 1(1), 1-9. Le Poire, B. (2006). Family communication: nurturing and control in a changing world. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Matoušek, O. (2003). Rodina jako instituce a vztahová síť. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. Mocná, D., Peterka, J., et al. (2004). Encyklopedie literárních žánrů. Praha: Paseka. Možný, I. (1990). Moderní rodina: (mýty a skutečnosti). Brno: Blok. Možný, I. (2008). Rodina a společnost. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON). Ortiz, C., Stowe, R., & Arnold, D. (2001). Parental influence on child interest in shared picture book reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(2), 263-281. Salisbury, M., & Styles, M. (2012). Children's picturebooks: the art of visual storytelling. London: Laurence King. Šeďová, K. (2006). Rodinná socializace dětského televizního diváctví (doctoral thesis). Available at http://is.muni.cz/th/23233/ff_d/Dizertace.pdf?lang=en Švaříček, R., & Šeďová, K. Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. Praha: Portál. Tuček, M., et al. (1998). Česká rodina v transformaci: stratifikace, dělba rolí a hodnotové orientace. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR. Williams, A., & Nussbaum, J. (2001). Intergenerational communication across the life span. Mahwah, N. J.: L. Erlbaum.

Author Information

Jana Sedlackova (presenting / submitting)
Masaryk University
Department of Educational Sciences
Lelekovice

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.