Building the Knowledge Base of Teacher Education: An Exploration of Successful Teachers’ Practices
Author(s):
Denchai Prabjandee (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 05 B, Teacher Education and the Professional Knowledge Base

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-24
13:30-15:00
Room:
NM-Theatre N
Chair:
Teresa O'Doherty

Contribution

In the landscape of language teacher education, the nature of knowledge base informs three broad areas: what teachers need to know, how it should be taught, and how they should learn to teach (Johnson, 2009). The history of the knowledge base in this field has been derived from related disciplines, such as applied linguistics, second language acquisition, and language pedagogy. This knowledge assumes that once the students are exposed to these types of knowledge, they will be able to teach effectively. However, recent studies have shown that it is not simple as it claims. Freeman and Johnson (1998) argued in their influential publication that the current knowledge base of language teacher education has little to do with language teaching itself. They wrote that the knowledge base in this field should involve “what and how language is actually taught in classrooms” (p. 410).

With the wake up call by Freeman and Johnson (1998), scholars in the field started to shift the focus to examine how language is taught in the classroom. What do teachers do in the language classroom? How do they teach their students? These two simple, yet powerful questions have driven scholars’ curiosity to step into language classrooms. However, it should be noted that not all teachers should be examined. Prior research started to focus on studying successful language teachers because they have a powerful influence on students’ learning (Stronge, 2002). By investigating language classrooms carefully, teacher educators will be able to add the results in the knowledge base of the field and use this knowledge to educate their students knowledge to educate their students to become successful language teachers. This paper attempts to examine how language teachers in Thailand teach their students. The present study focuses on Thai English teachers because English is a global language used for communication and receives much attention around the world. 

Method

Identifying successful English teachers is problematic since the review of the literature suggests that there is no objective measure. As a result, I employed an ongoing, critical, and reference-based examination approach. After choosing a famous school in the northeastern part of Thailand for convenient purpose, I asked the principal, academic affairs head, English department head, other English teachers, and students at the school to identify successful English teachers. I told them that I looked for teachers who “had achieved remarkable success in helping their students think, act, or feel” (Bain, 2004, p. 5). After receiving a list of successful teachers, two most-recommended teachers were selected as the participants. The data set consisted of field notes from 80 hours participant observation (40 hours each), four interviews, and artifact collections. The data were analyzed by using the coding method. Themes of how they teach the students will be shared in this presentation.

Expected Outcomes

The data revealed that the two successful English teachers had similar and unique teaching. They use their strengths to teach their students wholeheartedly. They perceived teaching as arts and science. They regarded teaching as not merely prescribing asset of knowledge to the students, rather teaching is a process of helping students become part of the educated world community. Three aspects of teaching will be shared: classroom expectations, relationships with students, and teaching principles. For classroom expectations, the teachers expected to see the learning growth of their students. They appreciated student individual’s learning development. The teachers also created positive, respectful, and caring relationship with their students. In terms of teaching principles, the teachers emphasized the use of English in the classrooms, activating students’ schema, using various learning activities, providing various supports, keeping students’ engaged, and providing constructive feedback.

References

Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K.E. (1998). Reconceputalizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-414. Johnson, K. E. (2009). Trends in second language teacher education. In A. Burns, & J. C. Richards. (Eds). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. (pp. 11-19). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Author Information

Denchai Prabjandee (presenting / submitting)
Faculty of Education, Burapha University, Thailand, Thailand

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.