Initial Teacher Education: What is the Role of Research in Developing Professional Knowledge
Author(s):
Rita Sousa (presenting / submitting) Amélia Lopes Pete Boyd
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 05 B, Teacher Education and the Professional Knowledge Base

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-24
13:30-15:00
Room:
NM-Theatre N
Chair:
Teresa O'Doherty

Contribution

Contemporary higher education today deals with a new spectrum of challenges giving relevance to the imperative to respond to new educational needs of the knowledge society (Miranda, 2007). Some may argued that the established approach to teaching in higher education, in relation to the knowledge society, reveals its insufficiency to prepare students with the skills to accomplish their professional achievement, and therefore to equip them with the skills to continue learning throughout life (Morgado, 2009; Santos, 2005). In developing graduates for the knowledge society lecturers in higher education institutions (HEI) may seek to strengthen links between research and teaching (Lopes et al., 2014). It is not only researchers who need to be involved with research since it is required in all kinds of jobs “to constantly follow new knowledge, understand phenomena with the aid of scientific thinking skills, and to be able to act as an active knowledge builder in society” (Murtonen et al 2008: 609).

Teachers and their education and training will have a central role in responding this desideratum. The main purpose of this paper is to understand what kind of knowledge, expertise and skills are consider relevant in initial teacher education (ITE) and the role of research in developing professional knowledge.

It seems to be widely accepted that teacher education and training have a key role in order to provide an adequate response to new challenges (Buchberger et al., 2000). Changes in society are leading to new expectations of the role of education which in turn is leading to new demands on the quality and competences of teachers. In this sense, and considering that knowledge is changing, school is changing, the teaching profession and the role of teachers is changing (Cornu, 2008), there is a need to rethink the purpose of teacher education in this new landscape. In fact, accordingly to Zeichner (2012), there is an “intense debate that is taking place in many parts of the world about the kind of teaching and teacher education that should define education in the twenty first century” (Zeichner, 2012: b).

A key issue is to know how teacher educators’ research activities empower or inhibit their teaching activity and students’ learning (Lopes et al., 2014). Besides having to deal with the demands that challenge every academic, namely teaching, research and scholarship, supervision and management, teacher educators also have to deal with the maintenance of standing and provision of service in a profession. In this scenario, teacher education plays a very significant role in increasing and assuring the quality of teachers (ATEE, 2006). An intensification of teachers’ workload and the pressure to achieve certain aims may encourage a paradigmatic orientation towards professional knowledge in which teachers’ welcome specific guidelines on the ‘right’ way of doing things (Burnett, 2006). However, in the current context, teacher education cannot be circumscribed to training technicians or transmitting knowledge but must be challenged to create it, promoting the relationship between teaching and research (Zabalza, 2004).

In order to avoid having teachers as simple technicians, teachers ought to be reflective about their teaching. In fact, we need ITE to be able to equip student teachers with the set of skills to continually inquire into their own teaching practice and into the contexts in which their teaching is embedded (Zeichner, 1987). This situation highlights the idea that ITE should allow student teachers to learn
to
be
thinkers
and
authentic
problem
solvers. This may be accomplished by rethinking the pedagogy of teacher education (Boyd, 2014) and by promoting meaningful interaction between learning and research.

Method

The present paper is part of a doctoral research project (SFRH/BD/52468/2014)* aiming to study the research teaching nexus in initial teacher education. The research project is a descriptive and interpretative multi-case study which aligns with the intention to investigate in depth particular cases that, despite their specificity, constitute institutional examples of the same research problem. The multi-case study allows us to identify similarities and singularities (Lessard-Hébert, Goyette & Boutin, 1994) in the way teaching and research are articulated in different HEI (research intensive and teaching intensive institutions), in this particular case, in Portugal and England. The goal is to be able to consider, within teacher education programmes in these contrasting institutions and with schools, the enabling factors and obstacles to the relationship between teaching and research. This is an important starting point for developing understanding of the Research-Teaching Nexus and for identifying strategies to promote such nexus. This paper sought to inquire into the perspectives of teacher educators (TE) and student teachers, in Portugal and England, about what type of knowledge, expertise and skills are consider relevant in initial teacher education, how initial teacher education in both countries manage to accomplish this, and the role of research in developing professional knowledge. The study was carried in two Portuguese higher education institutions and one English higher education institution. Although in Portugal initial teacher education requires a master degree (3 years corresponding to a bachelor plus 2 years corresponding to a master), in England there are a variety of paths to become a teacher. In this particular study, the initial teacher education course in the English higher education institution corresponds to a bachelor degree (3 years) with Qualified Teacher Status (QTS). Data were collected, in Portugal, through focus group discussions conducted with university-based teacher educators and with student teachers in their final year, in two different higher education institutions; and, in England, through semi-structured interviews with university-based teacher educators and group interviews with student teachers also in their final year. *Funded by FCT - the Portuguese funding agency that supports science, technology and innovation, in all scientific domains, under responsibility of the Ministry for Science, Technology and Higher Education

Expected Outcomes

Key findings show that TE, in both Portuguese and English HEI, claim the need to develop a set of skills that go beyond scientific knowledge, such as knowing how to teach, to be resilient and to adapt to different and challenging work contexts. Generally, there is a gap between what is taught during ITE and the reality of contexts which TE in both countries believe can be minimized through reflection on practice. Findings also reveal that research is more present in Portuguese teacher educators’ professional routine: publishing research and being a researcher are dominant pressures which are not referred by English TE that, although recognizing the importance of research in their role as TE, do not feel the pressure from their HEI to publish. In both countries there are complaints about lack of time for research and this translates into a priority given to teaching. Student teachers experiences in both countries prove to be significantly different and this may be due to the way ITE is organized. In Portugal there is a greater focus on theory which lead student teachers to refer some trouble in finding utility to the things they learn and their relation to practice. In England, student teachers have practical experiences since their first year, which they find crucial to their education as teachers. We can conclude that ITE in Portugal and England are going in two opposite directions with theory having a more significant role in the Portuguese context and practice having more relevance in the English context. This accentuates the need to understand what kind of graduates is ITE developing and what kind of professional knowledge is required for teachers. We believe there is a need to find a balance between these two extreme positions and that research may be the way to accomplish it

References

ATEE (2006). The Quality of Teachers: Recommendations on the development of indicators to identify teacher quality. Brussels: ATEE. Boyd, P. (2014). Using ‘modelling’ to improve the coherence of initial teacher education. In P. Boyd, A. Szplit & Z. Zbróg (Eds.) Teacher Educators and Teachers Learning: International Perspectives, Cracow: Libron Buchberger, F., Campos, B. P., Kallós, D. & Stephenson, J. (2000). Green paper on teacher education in europe: High quality teacher education for high quality education and training. Umea: TNTEE. Burnett, C. (2006). Constructions of professional knowledge among student and practising primary teachers: paradigmatic and narrative orientations. Research Papers in Education, 21(3), pp. 315–333. Cornu, B. (2008). Being a Teacher in a Knowledge Society. Proceedings of the TEPE 2nd Annual Conference Teacher Education in Europe: mapping the landscape and looking to the future. Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Lessard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., & Boutin, G. (1994). Investigação Qualitativa - Fundamentos e práticas. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget. Lopes, A., Boyd, P., Andrew, N., & Pereira, F. (2014). The research-teaching nexus in nurse and teacher education: contributions of an ecological approach to academic identities in professional fields. Higher Education, 68(2), 167-183. Miranda, Eva M. (2007). Ensino superior: novos conceitos em novos contextos. Revista de Estudos Politécnicos, V(8), 161–182. Morgado, J. C. (2009). Processo de Bolonha e Ensino Superior num Mundo Globalizado. Educação & Sociedade, 30(106), 37-62. Retirado em Maio de 2014 de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/es/v30n106/v30n106a03.pdf Murtonen, M., Olkinuora, E., Tynjälä, P., & Lehtinen, E. (2008) ‘Do I need research skills in working life?’:university students’ motivation and difficulties in quantitative methods courses. Higher Education, 56(5), 599-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9113-9. Zabalza, M. A. (2004). O ensino universitário: seu cenário e seus protagonistas. Porto Alegre: Artmed. Zeichner, K. (1987). Preparing reflective teachers: An overview of instructional strategies which have been employed in pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(5), pp. 565-575. Zeichner, K. (2012). Two Visions of Teaching and Teacher Education for the Twenty-First Century. Social Policy, Education and Curriculum Research Unit. North Dartmouth: Centre for Policy Analyses /UMass Dartmouth, pp. b - kk.


Author Information

Rita Sousa (presenting / submitting)
Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto
Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas
Porto
Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences
Education Sciences
Porto
University of Cumbria
Graduate School
Carlisle

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.