Session Information
16 SES 10 B, ICT and Assessment
Paper Session
Contribution
Technology has become part of our daily life up to the extend it is present in the simplest action of our life. For this reason, it is not strange it has also has become part of the teaching and learning process. Indeed, the information and communication technology (henceforth, ICT) is playing a key role in the formative assessment process. The development and implementation of the ICT in the last decade in the teaching and learning process are the distinctive elements of the 21st Century education. Currently, the learning and the access to it through the use of technologies are essential to successfully participate in the contemporary society (IEA, 2014).
In fact, social networks and the immediate interaction they provide are making social networks to become ideal environments to enhance feedback and, especially, peer-assessment. According to the Annual Learning Tool Survey, Twitter is believed to be the tool used the most in learning contexts.
The incorporation in education of 2.0 tools has been the field of study of a wide number of researches (Karvoundis, Chimos, Bersimis & Douligeris, 2014). Even though, the web 2.0 practices imported to the school context have been extensively analyzed (Crook, 2012), they should be further studied in Higher Education.
The research has proven students use social networks to fulfill essential learning social functions, such as help the present and past classmates, as well as, provide specific help to the development of school assignments (Greenhow, Robelia & Hughes, 2009). Likewise, Siemens and Weller (2011) ensure social networks enhance students’ peer dialogue, promote the comparison of resources and the acquisition and development of the communicative competence, thanks to the interaction between the personal and professional life.
Partially, this is caused due to the support ICT, such as blogs, Twitter, Skype, social networks, educational apps, provide to build up students’ own learning process. In this context, students overlap their personal world with their academic world. ICT enables them to access a wide range of information, share resources and discuss issues with their peers, as well as to create digital contents through formal and informal environments (Lyman, 2004; Manca & Ranierit, 2013).
It is true that ICT initially provide an excellent environment for students not only to take part in their learning process, but in their peers’. Moreover, technology-enhanced learning environments favor the development and acquisition of the competencies (Kim, 2011). Web 2.0 offer a range of possibilities to enhance reflection and peer collaboration in group work. Furthermore, there are technological platforms that allow the creation of learning activities. But above all, the efficient use of web 2.0 technologies can drive universities towards more holistic educational models (Schneckenberg, Ehlers & Adelsberger, 2011).
However, provided these initial advantages, it is worth to explore how university professors use technology for assessment purposes and the acquisition of competencies. In fact, little attention has been provided to university professors’ perceptions towards the role ICT plays in the evaluation, as well as, in the process of acquiring and developing the competencies. For this reason, two research questions are set out:
- Do teachers believe technology plays a key role in the assessment and the acquisition of competencies?
- Do professors use technology for assessment purposes?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Crook C. (2012). The digital native in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 63-80. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577946. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 119–140. Hamilton, S. (2011). Re-designing education. Paper presented at Education Leadership Summit, Singapore. IEA (2014). PREES RELEASE. Brussels: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) Karvounidis, T., Chimos, K., Bersimis, S., & Douligeris, C. (2014). Evaluating Web 2.0 technologies in higher education using students' perceptions and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 577-596. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12069. Kim, M.K. (2011). Technology-enhanced learning environments to solve performance problems: A Case of a Korean Company. TechTrends, 55, 1, 37-41. Lyman, P. (2004). Literature review: Digital-mediated experiences and kids’ informal learning. Available at https://www.macfound.org Manca, S., & Ranierit, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literatura on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 487-504. Schneckenberg, D., Ehlers, U., & Adelsberger, H. (2011). Web 2.0 and competence-oriented design of learning –Potentials and Implications for Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 5, 747-762. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01092.x Siemens, G., & Weller, M. (2011). Higher education and the promises and perils of social network. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 8(1), 164–170.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.