Attitudes Toward Migration Across European Countries: Results From ICCS 2009.
Author(s):
Wolfram Schulz (presenting / submitting) Bruno Losito Elisa Caponera
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 04 A, A Closer Look at Migration. Findings on Attitudes, Outcomes, and Returns on Education

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-24
09:00-10:30
Room:
NM-F101
Chair:
Paulina Korsnakova

Contribution

The European Union is a region with high levels of migration, both from outside the EU as well as between member countries (OECD, 2012). The movement of people into some European countries from former colonies, as well the recent increased movement of people between countries in Europe, is leading to more multicultural communities in many European countries. Recent events resulting from the Syrian refugee crisis have highlighted the challenges that results from having to balance the rights, cultures and traditions of diverse groups in society. Education plays an important role in facilitating cohesion in society (Ajegbo, Kiwan, & Sharma, 2007; Osler & Starkey, 2005) while at the same time education systems are facing new challenges when dealing with students with an immigrant background (Olson, 2013). These changes resulting from migration from outside Europe and between European countries have had an impact on educational policies and school curricula which have begun to put more emphasis on diversity, social cohesion and European issues (Eurydice, 2009, 2012).

The recent increase in refugees coming into Europe is originating proposals to reintroduce of border controls and to calls for limiting the freedom of movement across EU member countries. Using survey data from 2009, this paper investigates European lower secondary students’ attitudes towards migration. It describes students’ attitudes towards migration and their variation across European countries. Based on a conceptual framework that posits students’ dispositions toward civic issues as influenced by contextual factors related to the home and peer context, to the school and classroom environments, as well as to the wider community (see Schulz, Fraillon, Ainley, Losito, & Kerr, 2008), it also reviews the associations of students’ attitudes toward migration with factors related to students’ background (gender, home context, immigration background), students’ civic knowledge, European identity as well as school-related contexts (such as reports on opportunities to learn about Europe).  Findings will be compared across European countries and reviewed with regard to possible context factors at the national level (such as EU membership and the national percentage of immigrants).

Method

The paper is based on data from ICCS 2009 (Schulz, Ainley, Fraillon, Kerr, & Losito, 2010), which were collected through a student test and questionnaire, as well as contextual questionnaires for schools and teachers (see Schulz, Ainley, & Fraillon, 2011). Twenty-four European countries participated in a European module of ICCS 2009, which employed a regional student test and questionnaire designed to address aspects specific to the European region (Kerr, Sturman, Schulz, & Burge, 2010). The regional instrument gathered additional data on students’ knowledge and understanding about the European context as well as their attitudes, perceptions and behaviors in relation to specific European-related civic and political issues, institutions and policies. The analyses presented in this paper focus on students' attitudes towards equal rights for immigrants, attitudes towards restricting migration within Europe, and attitudes towards equal opportunities for other European citizens. In addition, it makes use of student background data (gender, home background) and school context data (students’ perceptions and reports from school principals). The paper will describe variations across European countries in student attitudes towards migration with regard to attitudes toward diversity and immigrants. It will also use multivariate models to review relationships between attitudes towards migration and student background and school-related factors at student and school levels. All results will be reported together with standard errors estimated using methods that take the complex sample design into account. Criterion variables will be questionnaire indices derived from IRT scaling, while criterion variables include questionnaire scales (e.g. SES), plausible values (reflecting students’ civic knowledge), and simple indicator variables (e.g. student gender).

Expected Outcomes

ICCS 2009 results show notable differences across European countries. These relate to the considerable differences among European countries in the history of and reasons for immigration, the size of the immigrant population, policies on immigration and how immigrants are perceived and received in society. Furthermore, across Europe, students from immigrant families displayed significantly more positive attitudes towards the rights of immigrants than those from non-immigrant families, while higher levels of civic knowledge were positively associated with positive attitudes toward immigration. Student reports with more opportunities to learn about Europe were also more likely to endorse equal opportunities for citizens from other European countries.

References

Ajegbo, K., Kiwan, D., & Sharma, D. (2007). Diversity and citizenship curriculum review. London, UK: Department for Education and Skills (DfES). Eurydice (2009). Integrating Immigrant Children into School in Europe. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. Eurydice (2012). Citizenship Education in Europe. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. Kerr, D., Sturman, L., Schulz, W., & Bethan, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 European Report. Civic knowledge, attitudes and engagement among lower secondary school students in twenty-four European countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). OECD (2012). International Migration Outlook 2012. Paris: OECD. Olson, M. (2013). Citizenship Education without Citizenship? The Migrant in EU Education Policy on European Citizenship. Toward the Margin through “Strangification’. In R. Hedtke & Tatjana Zimenkova (Eds), Education for Civic and Political Participation. A Critical Approach (pp. 155-170). New York & London: Routledge. Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2005). Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., (Eds.) (2011). ICCS 2009 Technical Report. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D. & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report. Civic knowledge, attitudes and engagement among lower secondary school students in thirty-eight countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B. & Kerr, D. (2008). International Civic and Citizenship Education Study. Assessment Framework. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

Author Information

Wolfram Schulz (presenting / submitting)
Australian Council for Educational Research, Australia
Roma Tre University
Roma Tre University

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.