"Lesson Study - How To Ensure That The Reflection Talk Moves Beyond The Actual Situation and Action?"
Author(s):
Kåre Hauge (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES E 12, Professionalism and Education

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-22
15:30-17:00
Room:
OB-H2.20
Chair:
Edwin Keiner

Contribution

The theme for this article (abstract) are professional learning communities in schools, and how collaboration between teachers can help strengthen teachers 'teaching skills and to improve students' learning outcomes. Professional learning communities are based on the assumption that teachers who cooperate can achieve more together than if they were working on their own in order to support teachers' learning and knowledge and educational development more generally (Helstad, 2013; Vescio, Ross & Adams, 2008).

The theoretical framework for this research is rooted in a sociocultural and constructivist tradition. Within sociocultural thinking is learning situated in that learning occurs in a physical and social context, and all development in this perspective is understood to be founded in interpersonal activities and reflections on this (Alexander & Winnie, 2006; Dysthe, 2001; Korthagen, 2001; Slavin, 2006; Säljö, 1999: Vygotsky, 1978). Professional learning communities can according to Vescio, Ross & Adams (2008) anchored in two conditions. Firstly, it is assumed that learning is situated in the daily practice. This means that it is believed that the knowledge wich is learned happens in a physical and social context, and that the practice can best be understood through critical reflection with colleagues who share the same experiences. The situation where learning takes place and how knowledge is learned, is an integral part of what is being learned. Secondly, it is assumed that teachers are active and participating to increase their professional knowledge and improving their practice.

In my research, I am particularly concerned about the conversations that take place in teachers' professional learning community, and particularly reflection conversation. Dewey (1933) makes it clear that if it should happen learning, it must be reflected over the actions that happen and how actions have led to changes. Dewey hereby emphasized that reflection related to shared experiences and reflected thinking that addresses the practical exercise of the teaching profession is essential for teachers' development. Zeichner & Liston (1996) points out that reflection on the teachers' own practice may prevent the teaching profession are reduced to pure goal-agent business. For that reflection conversations should be meaningful and contribute to learning, it is assumed that teachers share a common experience or a challenge they struggle. Teachers and the school of development also depends on the school has a culture that legitimizes a critical reflective attitude to educational practice. To develop the critical reflective conversation and critical reflective attitude is a constructive element which is necessary to obtain a positive development and to get changed practice (Senge, 2006).

My research questions have emerged during the cooperation I have had with the school I cooperate with. After reading reflection notes from teachers, participated in reflection conversations with teachers and interviews with teachers, I seem to see that many reflections are related to a form of summary or review of the teaching action and less about the actions in light of the challenges or research questions teachers had. Many states also that the reflection calls and critical reflection is difficult and challenging. On the basis of collected data, I have come to this research question: how to ensure that reflection talks moves beyond the actual situation and action? In the article I will discuss how educators can collaborate in professional learning communities to develop their profession and to further develop the ability of reflection and critical thinking. Dewey points out the importance of reflection and if the reflection talks are to contribute learning and knowledge sharing among teachers, it will be important in this research project to find out how these calls can be improved. Areas for improvement are mentioned below expected outcomes.

Method

In this research is Lesson Study used as a method to organize and lead development (Fernandez, 2002; Lewis, Perry & Murata, 2006). A significant reason for using Lesson Study is that learning takes place in classrooms context where teachers can examine the entire complexity of teaching and learning processes. The method was originally developed in Japan (Lewis & Tsuchida, 1997 Stiegler & Hiebert, 1999), and it is a proven method for developing teacher professionalism in using systematic planned and implemented learning activities. The method has clear parallels to action research in which teachers work together to develop practices (Revans, 1982; Steen Olsen & Postholm, 2009). Lesson Study implies that a group of teachers meet regularly over a period (which can vary from several months up to several years) to work with the design, implementation, testing of educational programs, reflections and improvements around teaching (Stigler & Hiebert, 1999). As such, the method can be a form of action learning or innovation, where Lesson Study is a formative intervention (Engeström and Sannino, 2010). There are several key principles in Lesson Study which helps to control the method and which will be crucial whether learning or knowledge-building among the participants has occurred. Firstly it is important to point out that it is a teacher-led method used in professional learning communities with 3-5 participants. The size of the learning community can be greater, but in this study, groups of 3-5 participants. The fact that it is teacher-led means that there is the teacher group who decide what is their focus for Lesson Study - what they want to learn more about, or which areas they want to explore and investigate within their own practices with the aim and intention to improving practice in these areas. As a researcher in this project it is important to be aware of the responsibility it is to lead the research and getting progress in the research process. It is also important for me as a researcher conducting a formative intervention (Engeström & Sannino, 2010) to ensure that the actual implementation in terms of Lesson Study is led and owned by teachers. My role has largely been about being an initiator and facilitator, reflection partner in Lesson Study phases and to lead the project in an evolving and learning direction.

Expected Outcomes

So far in my research I have somewhat surprisingly found that teachers find reflection talks as difficult and challenging. It might be taken for granted that teachers possess the knowledge and skills that will enable them to lift their eyes and pull in critical perspectives and critical gaze in reflection calls. To develop the study with Lesson Study, I have together with the teachers pointed out some areas for improvement in terms of changing and moving reflection conversations beyond situation and the action itself. 1) challenges and difficulties teachers have in their practices should be specified and sharpened to a greater extent, 2) design of assignments and learning actively ether students will work with must be designed in a way that they can meet the specific challenges, and 3) observing the focus must be directed towards how tasks and learning activities meet teachers' challenges with their teaching. With an increased awareness and focus on these three points, one can assume will help strengthen reflection talks and that they are being raised over the actual situations and action.

References

Alexander, P. A., Winnie, P. H. (2006), Handbook of Educational Psychology, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Dewey, J. (1933) How we think. A restatement on the philosophy of education New York: The Maximillian Company Dysthe, O. (2001), Dialog, samspel og læring. Abstrakt forlag AS Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future Challenges .Educational Research Review 5(2010) 1-24 Fernandez, C. (2002) Learning for Japanese approaches professional development. The case of Lesson Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393-405 Helstad, K. (2013) Kunnskapsutvikling blant lærere i videregående skole. En studie av et skoleutviklingsprosjekt om skriving i og på tvers av fag. Doktorgradsavhandling. Universitetet i Oslo Korthagen, F. A. J., (2001). The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006) How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of Lesson Study. Educational Reaseacher, 35 (3), 3-14 Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The shift to student-centered elementary science. Journal of Educational Policy, 12, 313-331. Revans, R.W. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt. Senge, P. (2006) The fifth Dicipline: The Art and Practice of the learning organization. New York: Dubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc. Slavin, R. E. (2006) Educational Psychology – Theory and Practice, Eight Edition Pearson Education Inc Steen-Olsen, Tove & Postholm, May Britt (2009); Å utvikle en lærende skole, Aksjonsforskning og aksjonslæring i praksis. Høyskoleforlaget, Norwegian Academic Press, Kristiansand Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. NY: Free Press. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of Tools. A Sociocultural Perspective on the Human-Technology Link. I K. Littleton & P. Light (red.), Learning with Computers. Analysing Productive Interaction, s. 144-161. New York: Routledge. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008) A rewiew of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 24. s. 80-91 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Zeicner, K.& Liston, D. (1996): Reflective Teaching: An Introduction, New Yersey, Lawrence Erlbaun Associates

Author Information

Kåre Hauge (presenting / submitting)
NTNU, Norway

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.