Session Information
09 SES 10 B, Formative and Summative Assessments
Paper Session
Contribution
Data-driven decision making has become increasingly important in education around the world and, over the last two decades, in Germany as well. In line with recently modified policies on quality assurance in education worldwide, schools are expected to enhance schooling through systematic use of empirical data. Teachers are therefore expected to interpret and employ data to improve their instructional decisions, schooling in general, and to implement reforms and innovations. National and international research currently provides very little evidence concerning the question which determinants in school organization and structure can play a role in using data and therefore directly influence teachers’ evidence orientation. A few studies, however, suggest that principals’ leadership practice as well as structural conditions influence teachers’ active and successful participation in school and curriculum development (e.g., Schildkamp & Kuiper, 2010; Dedering, 2012).
On the one hand, in terms of school structure elements, schools’ prevailing communication, cooperation, and participation structures are mostly mentioned as potentially influencing teachers’ evidence orientation (Pant & Thiel, 2012; Wayman, Spring, Lemke, & Lehr, 2012; Breiter & Karbautzki, 2012). Recently, findings indicate the influence of school structure characteristics on teachers' evidence orientation (Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Förster, Preuße, Mater, & Stump, in press). According to this study, especially internal cooperation and participation structures had considerable large effects on teachers' external evidence orientation. Participation structures and external cooperation were identified as predictors of teachers' internal evidence orientation.
On the other hand, the international state of research also indicates a central role of principals in systematic, data-based school development (Levin & Datnow, 2012; Anderson, Leithwood, & Strauss, 2010). It should, however, be noted that this mainly refers to the examination of the influence principals’ leadership styles have on the teaching staff. Several recent studies have determined the influence of the principals’ transformational leadership on teachers’ evidence orientation in decision-making (Stump, Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, & Mater, in press; Wayman et al., 2012). To date, there has been little empirical research on to what extent principals’ evidence orientation as determining their data-wise practice is essential to promoting teachers’ evidence orientation in their classroom practices and, therefore, to sustaining improvement in education. A further look at studies examining conditions for successful school improvement processes shows correlations between principals' practice, especially orientations, and innovation-stimulating attitudes of teaching staff (Buske, 2015; Urton, Wilbert, & Hennemann 2014).
Overall, there has been no simultaneous consideration of the various school organization and school structure elements as well as principals' data-wise practice and their influence on teachers’ evidence orientation. This presentation aims to further examine predictors for teachers’ evidence orientation, with a particular focus on school structures as well as principals’ evidence orientation. Thus, it addresses two aspects: perceived school structures, modeled on the individual level, and the influence of principals’ evidence orientation, modeled on the school level. Overall, the study contributes to the empirical determination which factors may ultimately encourage or obstruct evidence-based teaching practices. So, this study focuses the wider theme of the uses made of assessment results in teaching, evaluation and policy making as it highlights (possible) prerequisites for teachers' evidence orientation, which guides teaching and learning in the classroom.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 292¬–327. Breiter, A., & Karbautzki, L. (2012). Data-Use in Schools - A Cross-Country Study. Retrieved from http://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/ICSEI_2012_WAB_1792909_Breiter_&_ Karbautzki_Data_Use_in_Schools.pdf Buske, R. (2015, January). Effects of School Structures on Teachers´ Collective Innovativeness - An Empirical Study from Germany. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSEI), Cincinnati (Ohio). Dedering, K. (2012). Steuerung und Schulentwicklung. Bestandsaufnahme und Theorieperspektive [Governance and school development. Inventory and theoretical perspective]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Levin, J. A., & Datnow, A. (2012). The Principal Role in Date Driven Decision Making: Using case study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School improvement, 23(2), 179–201. Pant, H. A., & Thiel, F. (2012). Schulen als Steuerungsakteure im Bildungssystem (StABil) [Schools as governing protagonists in educational system]. Retrieved from http://www.stebis.de/forschungsprojekte/SteBis_Pressegespr__ch_-_Befunddarstellungen _Thiel.pdf Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482–496. Stumm, S., Dormann, C., & Mohr, N. (2010). Evidenzbasiertes Management als Schlüssel für den Transfer zwischen Wissenschaft und unternehmerischer Praxis [Data-based Management as Key to the Transfer from Science into Business Practice]. Paper presented at the 47th Conference of the German Psychological Society, Bremen. Stump, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Mater, O. (in press). The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Data Use. Journal for Educational Research Online. Urton, K., Wilbert, J., & Hennemann T. (2014). Der Zusammenhang zwischen der Einstellung zur Integration und der Selbstwirksamkeit von Schulleitungen und deren Kollegien. [The relationship between the attitude towards integration and the self-efficacy of school principals and their colleges] Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 1, 3-16. Wayman, J. C., Spring, S. D., Lemke, M. D., & Lehr, M. D. (2012). Using Data to Inform Practice: Effective Principal Leadership Strategies. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2012, Vancouver/Kanada. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Förster, M., Preuße, D., Mater, O., & Stump M. (in press). Influence of Communication, Cooperation, and Participation Structures at Schools on Teachers’ Evidence-Based Actions. Journal for Educational Research Online.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.