Session Information
22 SES 04 B, Students' Readiness and Expectations
Paper Session
Contribution
The period between school graduation and the first months of study in a university is characterized by high level of stressfulness and uncertainty for applicants and students. A college life requires from freshmen a higher level of independence, self-regulation, and initiative in comparison with a school (Bryde & Milburn, 1990). Most researchers concerned with the analysis of student experience in higher education institutions agree that different aspects of student behavior in a university such as engagement and investment in curricular and extracurricular activities, communication with faculty and administrative workers, social activity etc., are inevitably linked with pre-university educational expectations and it’s (in)congruence with actual experience. According to [Chapman 1981], educational expectations refer to student perception of what he or she will be doing or will have accomplished during study at university and involves an estimate of reality and future performance. Students do not enter university tabula rasa. They come with some socio-economic background and academic experience, which shape their attitudes about higher education in general and a certain institution in particular. Mismatches between expectations and real student experience can lead to difficulties in adaptation to university life, dissatisfaction with study, and finally withdrawal decisions. Therefore, the difference between educational expectations about student life and real student experience at university is a topic of great concern among scholars, who interested in transition from school to college. Many research projects in this field were focused on measuring solely (mis)match between expectations and reality (for example, Cook, Leckey 1999). Other studies tried to investigate factors influenced student’s expectation or their match with reality. The third group of research examined the effect of expectations on learning outcomes, student satisfaction and some psychological characteristics like optimism. There are few studies that develop complex models of student transition and specifically the role of educational expectation in it, which include (1) factors that influence forming student expectations, (2) match between expectations and reality, and (3) effects of differences between expectations and reality on satisfaction with learning and academic outcomes. This article goes on to offer such a complex model of the role of educational expectations in the student transition process.
Background
A lot of freshman studies were dedicated to exploring student expectations about their future experience at university and actual experience in a higher education institution. They found that student expectations are more positively toned than their real first year experience (Stern 1966; Berdie 1968; Buckley 1971; Herr 1971; Pate 1970; Schoemer 1973; Watkins 1978). This empirical fact was called “freshman myth” (Baker, McNeil, Siryk 1985). Contrary, some studies (for instance: Cook, Leckey 1999) indicated that student’s expectations are lower than estimates of real student experience.
Some research in this field indicated that mismatch between student pre-university expectations and reality of the first year of study negatively affects the process of adaptation to higher education (Tranter 2003, Smith & Hopkins 2005). In the theoretical model developed by Chemers, Hu, and Garcia (2001), academic expectations were considered as moderator variables through which academic self-efficiency and optimism indirectly influence classroom performance, stress, health, and overall satisfaction and commitment to remain in university.
Mainardes, Alves and Raposo (2014) considered the extent to which a university meets student expectations as an indicator of its efficiency that is measured by the level of student satisfaction. According to them, educational expectations are a main prerequisite for satisfaction with study. They found the correlation between student expectations and overall satisfaction. In addition, they showed that this relationship depends on the institutional characteristics. For example, it was observed, that the link between expectations and satisfactions is stronger for smaller-scale universities (Mainardes, Alves, & Raposo 2014).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Baker R.W., McNeil O.V., Siryk B. (1985). Expectation and Reality in Freshman Adjustment to College. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 32(1). P. 94-103. Berdie R.F. (1968). Changes in university perceptions during the first two college years. Journal of College Student Personnel. 9. P. 85-89. Briggs A.R.J., Clark J., Hall I. (2012) Building bridges: understanding student transition to university. Quality in Higher Education. 18(1). P. 3-21. Bryde J.F., Milburn C.M. (1990). Helping to make the transition from high school to college. In R. L. Emans (Ed.), Understanding undergraduate education (pp. 203-213). Vermillion, SD: University of South Dakota Press. Buckley H.D. (1971). A comparison of freshman and transfer expectations. Journal of College Student Personnel. 12. P. 186-188. Chapman D.W. (1981) A Model of Student College Choice. The Journal of Higher Education. 52(5). P. 490-505. Chemers M.M., Hu L., Garcia B.F. (2001) Academic Self-Efficacy and First-Year College Student Performance and Adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 93(1). P. 55-64. Cook A., Leckey J. (1999). Do Expectations Meet Reality? A survey of changes in first-year student opinion. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 23(2). P. 157-171. Herr E.L. (1971). Student needs, college expectations, and “reality” perceptions. Journal of Educational Research. 65. P. 51-56. Mainardes E., Alves H., Raposo M. (2014). Using expectations and satisfaction to measure the frontiers of efficiency in public universities. Tertiary Education and Management. 20(4). P. 339-353. Pate R.H. Jr. (1970). Student expectations and later expectations of a university enrollment. Journal of College Student Personnel. 11. P. 458-462. Schoemer J.R. (1973). Higher education misrepresented – Who is responsible? NASPA Journal. 10. P. 192-197. Smith, K. & Hopkins, C., 2005, ‘Great expectations: sixth-formers’ perceptions of teaching and learning in degree-level English’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4(3), P. 304–18. Smith J.S., Wertlieb E.C. (2005). Do First-Year College Students’ Expectations Align with their First-Year Experiences? NASPA Journal. 42(2). P. 153-174. Stern G.G. (1966). Myth and reality in the American college. AAUP Bulletin 52. P. 408-414. Tranter, D., (2003). ‘“Fish out of Water”: students from disadvantaged schools and the university experience’, paper presented at Creating Spaces: interdisciplinary writings in the Social Sciences Conference, Australian National University, Canberra, 17–18 July. Watkins D. (1978). A note on student satisfaction with university: A case study. Education Research and Perspectives. 5. P. 45-53.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.