Professional development by sharing and developing digital competences in upper secondary schools in Norway
Author(s):
Nils Ole Nilsen (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 10 D, Teacher Professional Development and Lifelong Learning

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-25
15:30-17:00
Room:
NM-Theatre P
Chair:
Marita Cronqvist

Contribution

Unlike other parts of the teaching profession, it may seem that it is almost completely legitimate to admit to a teacher colleague the incompetence when it comes to ICT. Sometimes, it is even met with an understanding smile when teachers talk about their use of ICT. Among teachers, it would not be legitimate to admit a weakness in relation to dissemination of subjects, or difficulties building relationships with ones own students. It may seem that there is a kind of remoteness of ICT skills and that these skills are not central in the professional identity of teachers. This could be interpreted as a reluctance among teachers to face up to the demands of the national curriculum; namely, that digital skills are one of the basic competences that our students are to learn, and our society will need in the future. According to Morgan´s (2009) definition of a learning organization, organizations need to orient themselves in relation to their surroundings.

In many schools, organized work to improve the teachers’ digital competence are rare; it happens, but tends to be sporadic and unsystematic. Those who do participate will, in some cases, but not often enough, receive sufficient support to succeed.


In his book about action learning, Tom Tiller points to the possible problem when there is too much distance between school leaders and teachers in terms of knowledge about school development and organizational development (Tiller 2006). I think it is easy to draw a parallel to the knowledge of the pedagogical use of ICT in a schools. Major differences in digital literacy among teachers and among school leaders, causes challenges in building a stronger and a common culture for learning how to use ICT to promote student learning in a school organization. This also applies to other areas of pedagogical knowledge, such as differences in didactic skills or classroom management skills. But, the situation concerning digital skills may be somewhat unique. The "accelerating technology development and ... expanding possibilities for teaching and learning using ICT" (Halvorsen 2012, s.170), and the fact that ICT has become such a central tool for internal and external communication in any organization, makes differences in competence more visible than other differences in a school organization. And, we might expect the differences to increase faster too. Thus, this requires the initiation of an organized effort to increase the digital competence of teachers and leaders.

The central questions for this research has been how school leaders in upper secondary schools facilitate or lead school based ICT programs as a contribution for professional development among teachers?

Part of the focus of this article will be on the significance of making ICT competence a shared vision among the teachers in a school. To create such visions does not seem to be easy. Any attempt to anchor such a vision, if it is perceived as a top-down action, may be met with skepticism and be interpreted as pompous and remote. If school leaders, however, recognize the management's distributed nature, meaning that there are many who exercise leadership, not only formal leaders (Halvorsen 2012), we will perhaps be able to initiate actions. In this context, I include Viviane Robinson's definition of management, that it "is about influencing others to act so that the organization achieves its objectives" (in Halvorsen 2012 p.86). In such a perspective, spreading the good stories about what their colleagues are doing can be a strategic action for a headmaster. 

Method

This research is an analysis of the digital competence in a number of upper secondary schools in Norway. School leaders have described in blogs what challenges they have had in their professional development programs, trying to implement ICT as a pedagogical tool for learning. In these selected blogs, they describe school-based ICT projects. I have selected blogs that describes content about the described topic. Content analysis is a research methods at the intersection between qualitative and quantitative traditions. Content analysis is valuable in organizational research because it allows researchers to recover and examine the nuances of organizational behaviors, stakeholder perceptions, and societal trends. It is also an important bridge between purely quantitative and purely qualitative research methods. In one regard, content analysis allows researchers to analyze socio-cognitive and perceptual constructs that are difficult to study via traditional quantitative archival methods. At the same time, it allows researchers to gather large samples that may be difficult to employ in purely qualitative studies. (Jacobsen, 2005) I will use models from my own research (Nilsen, 2010), but also the Nonaka and Takeuchis Seki model (1995) in my analysis of these projects. I will discuss the school-leaders’ role in digital competence building. Here I will use three theoretical elements in particular: Nilsen’s (2010) processing Berg’s (2008) levels of school leadership theories of distributed management, and Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) model for didactic technology expertise.

Expected Outcomes

Another reason why recognition of management’s distributed nature is important in terms of ICT, is the vast and very diverse aspirations of ICT in education. As Ludvigsen, and Erstad and Hauge point out, the changes that come with digital innovations are so large that, they constitute a "cultural expansion", not only adjustments to the existing culture (Halvorsen 2014 s.169). This increasing complexity can make it difficult for school leaders to engage in efficient operational management through, for example, five minute walks or other observations of teachers' work with pedagogical use of ICT. We can view this through adopting Mishra and Koehler's model of didactic technology competence (Nilsen 2010). In a large and diverse upper secondary school, the needs for a school leader's technological knowledge could be so wide that, that it is difficult for a single leader cannot at the same time have all the pedagogical and content knowledge to meet the needs of all the teachers in the school. Thus, monitoring the teachers tend to focus on either pedagogical knowledge or content knowledge. On the other hand, networks of teachers with interest in technological knowledge may make it easier to observe and provide feedback regarding the use of ICT. They will be able to exercise a part of the leadership role towards their colleagues.

References

Berg M. E. (2008) Ledelse, verktøy og virkemidler 3. Utg. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget Halvorsen, K.A. (2014) Distribuert ledelse. Læreres læring og ledelse av profesjonsutvikling, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS Halvorsen, K.A. (2014) Ledelse og kompetanseutvikling når Lia videregående skole tar i bruk digitale hjelpemidler. Læreres læring og ledelse av profesjonsutvikling, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS Hargraves A. & Fullan M. (2012) Professional Capital. Transforming Teaching in Every School. London: Routeledge Irgens, E.J. (2012). Profesjon og organisasjon. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS Jacobsen D. I (2005) Hvordan gjennomføre undersøkelser? Innføring i samfunnsvitenskapelig metode. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Mishra, P. & Koehler M. J. (2006) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108 (6) s. 1017 – 1054 Morgan G. (2009) Organisasjonsbilder. Innføring i organisasjonsteori. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget Nilsen, N.O. (2010). Rektors ledelseskompetanse – hva skal til for å utvikle en digitalt kompetent skole? IR.-A. Andreassen, E.J. Irgens, & E.M. Skaalvik, Kompetent skoleledelse. Trondheim: Tapir Akademiske Forlag Nilsen, N.O. (2015). Forelesning Digital skole. Tromsø, 18.03.2015 Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press Tiller, T. (2006). Aksjonslæring—forskende partnerskap i skolen. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget

Author Information

Nils Ole Nilsen (presenting / submitting)
Nord University
Teacher Education
Bodø

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.