Session Information
16 SES 12, ICT in Educational Contexts
Paper Session
Contribution
Recent developments in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) have transformed the very fabric of the education continuum. Such is the pervasiveness of technology in the everyday lives of both teachers and students, ICT and Technology Enhanced Learning Environments (TELEs) have become inextricably linked to the future of students’ engagement with primary level education, second level education and beyond (OECD, 2015; Enochsson & Rizza, 2009; European Commission, 2014). We define a TELE as a learning environment enhanced by the use, or presence of, mobile or otherwise digital technology. However, across the education continuum developments in technology have, in many instances, outstripped the ability of educators to keep pace with such developments leaving efforts to harness technology in creative and potentially transformative innovations frustrated (Mishra, Koelher, & Kereluik, 2009). Educational Design Research (EDR) (Reeves & McKenney, 2013), as a constructivist methodology, is therefore critically aligned to respond to this widening gap by developing, through rigorous longitudinal studies, designs that work in practice and respond to contemporary technological developments. This paper outlines and discusses the work of an educational design research cluster, committed to rigorously investigating the potential of EDR, in the pursuit of generating knowledge-based adoptable and adaptable (Barab & Squire, 2004) design methodologies (Wang & Hannafin, 2005) for use in educational settings. It is our position that these designed methodologies have the potential for authentic and meaningful impact in naturalistic educational settings and to lead through design.
Design research conducted in an educational setting demands that researchers acknowledge the complexities of the target environment or the naturalistic context (Barab, 2006). The research projects discussed here are spread across the continuum of education from primary education, second level education, undergraduate Initial Teacher Education (ITE) and postgraduate ITE and represent all stages of design research from conceptual design to final design methodology output. Within these naturalistic contexts the authors are respectively engaged in research that: helps new entrants to undergraduate ITE programmes form emergent collaborative Communities of Practice (CoP); develops technology based engagement with core science concepts at second level education; links formal and informal learning spaces for primary school students; and engaging second level learners with language and literature, all supported by ICT and rooted contemporary TELEs.
This research paper will discuss an issue of critical importance in design research - the nature of the research output. While iteratively refined design methodologies are produced as tangible outcomes, it is the very flexibility within such design outputs that make them applicable for practitioners in a real-world, classroom setting. Designing such outputs, in an era where the growth of technological advancement is exponential, is an approach to a collaborative engagement with education that can lead, not only practitioners as they strive to maximise their performance and effectiveness, but also an educational research community that aspires to make an impact on the ground, or what Donald Schön affectionately describes as the ‘swampy lowland[s]’ (Schön, 1983, p.42) of the real-world educationalist.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Barab, S. (2006). Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 153–169). Barab, S.A., & Squire, K. (2004) Design-based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. Enochsson, A. B., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in initial teacher training: Research review. European Commission (2014). Report to the European Commission on new modes of learning and teaching in higher education. Luxembourg, Public Office of the European Union. Mishra, P., Koelher, J. & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48-53. OECD (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Conducting educational design research. Routledge. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic books. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.