The Changing Experiences Of Student Teachers On School Placement From Maynooth University: A Longitudinal Study- 2009-2016.
Author(s):
Sarah O'Grady (presenting / submitting) Rose Dolan (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 02 A, School Based Teacher Education and University-School Partnerships (Part 2)

Paper Session continued from 10 SES 01 A

Time:
2016-08-23
15:15-16:45
Room:
NM-G107
Chair:
Julia Planer

Contribution

The complexities and effectiveness of Initial teacher education (ITE) have become hegemonic policy issues in Europe (European Commission, 2014). Effective ITE programmes include extended school placements in schools that share the vision and values of the ITE programme (Zeichner & Conklin, 2008). Nevertheless, school placement practices vary greatly between European countries, with programme changes having occurred in several countries since publication of the 2013 Eurydice report. ITE programmes in the Republic of Ireland have been reconceptualised in recent years, with an extension to the duration of both concurrent and consecutive ITE programmes. Since 2014, consecutive ITE programmes have extended from one- to two-years in duration, with the Professional Diploma in Education (PDE) being replaced with a level 9 Professional Master of Education (PME). The publication of the Guidelines on School Placement (Teaching Council, 2013) has clearly defined the roles of stakeholders in ITE for the first time.

The socialisation of student teachers into the teaching profession has been widely explored. McNally, Cope, Inglis and Stronach (1997) indicated that the quality of transition from student teacher to teacher was determined by others; with the influence co-operating teachers, as well as other teachers have on the development of the student teacher, serving as a crucial condition for individual development. The social relationships that student teachers develop in school contexts are of central importance to their learning (ibid.). The key role partnerships and school placement contexts as professional communities play in student teacher learning is widely acknowledged (European Commission, 2014). One of the ways in which student teachers learn to become teachers is through situated learning, namely learning as a collaborative social practice and gradual growth into a community of practice (Lave and Wenger, 1991). This learning happens through legitimate peripheral participation (LPP) in communities of practice (CoP) (Lave and Wenger, 1991). Therefore, situated learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991) and communities of practice (Wenger, 1998) provide the theoretical framework for this paper.

This paper is part of a longitudinal study that explores the experiences of Maynooth University student teachers while on school placement, with a particular focus on the support structures available to them. Our study examines the ways in which identity is constructed by involvement in communities of practice, in this regard involvement in schools as organisations, the teachers within them and, at a more fundamental level, the staffroom within which they work, and how these ways of construction of identity have changed between 2009 and 2015/16. We explore the processes in place to assist student teachers in moving from LPP towards central/core participation where experienced practitioners work. Processes such as school-specific induction practices are examined, with a focus on induction into the school and to the profession as sub-categories of the process.

The study has been carried out with four cohorts of student teachers in Maynooth University in 2008-09, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16.  This paper compares data gathered from the 2009 cohort with the current 2015-16 cohort and presents the findings from student teachers’ experiences during the initial month of their school placement. It considers how changes to the programme since 2009 have impacted on the experiences of the student teachers on school placement and the extent to which changes at national level (DES, 2011; Teaching Council, 2011a, 2011b, 2013) are affecting experiences on the ground.

The research objectives for the study include:

  1. Exploring the types of formal and informal support made available to student teachers;
  2. Identifying the challenges experienced by them while on School Placement;
  3. Examining the development and transformation of the student teacher. 

Method

Quantitative data have been gathered from several cohorts of student teachers undertaking the consecutive ITE post-primary programme at an Irish university. For this paper, data were gathered using a questionnaire distributed to all student teachers in semester 1 of 2008/09 and again in semester 1 of 2015/16. The questionnaire explored areas such as the demographics of participants, school information, mentoring, support structures, induction and the observation process in the school. The questionnaire was distributed in hard copy in 2008/09 and electronically in 2015. Response rates for 2008/09 were 94% and 50% for 2015.The higher number of responses collected in 2008/09 may be due to the Hawthorn effect as the researcher was present when questionnaires were being completed. Data were analysed using SPSS and frequencies for each section on the questionnaire were generated. Categories were then cross-tabulated to ascertain if there were connections between different categories. The results from 2008/09 were then compared with the results from 2015 to determine changes to the experiences of student teachers on placement in the intervening 5 years. As mentioned earlier, situated learning and legitimate peripheral participation provide the frame for understanding these results in relation to the professional socialisation of the student teacher. The findings are also considered through the three tier framework comprising, school-level, programme level and national level changes to ITE. Data gathered from the 2015-16 cohort are also analysed in relation to the Guidelines on School Placement (Teaching Council, 2013).

Expected Outcomes

Initial analysis of the data shows a number of differences between the experiences of the 2009 cohort and the 2015 cohort. While there continues to be variations between schools, the 2015 cohort report an increase in support offered, including formal induction meetings and increased access to a designated mentor teacher. These changes have also manifested themselves in an increased sense of integration into the school and the profession from the outset, resulting in an increase in the numbers in 2015 reporting more certainty about teaching as their long-term career. There are also increases in practices such as observation of the student teacher by experienced colleagues and, although these increases are welcome, the findings still indicate a pattern whereby the majority of student teachers do not have these experiences within their schools. In such instances, some respondents felt they were at times left to their own devices to succeed or fail in their attempts to assimilate into school culture as student teachers. When examining respondents’ professional socialisation, both cohorts commented on how teaching was more difficult than they had first anticipated. This correlates with McIntyre & Hagger (1992:272) who state that ‘…interns believe that teaching is much simpler than it is’. The availability of school placement guidelines and the requirement for a school policy in relation to school placement are probably drivers in relation to these changes to practice. It is possible that the clearly defined role for the school and the co-operating teacher has given permission to these teachers to engage in a formal way in the development of the student teacher. It is also possible that the development of a national induction programme for newly-qualified teachers has raised awareness around the induction of student teachers into schools and the profession.

References

Conway, P.F., Murphy, R., Delargey, M., Hall, K., Kitching, K., Long, F., McKeon, J., Murphy, B., O’Brien, S. and O’Sullivan, D. (2011). Learning to teach study (LETS) Executive summary. Cork: School of Education, University College Cork. Department of Education and Skills. (DES). (2011). Literacy and numeracy for learning and life: The National Strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people. Dublin: Author. Department of Education and Skills. (2012). Report of the International Review Panel on the Structure of Initial Teacher Education Provision in Ireland. Dublin: Author. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2013). Key Data on Teachers and School Leaders in Europe. 2013 Edition. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission. (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: an overview of policy issues. Background note for the ET2020 Working Group on Schools Policy, Author: F. Caena. Accessed online at http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/expertgroups/documents/initial-teacher-education_en.pdf Heinz, Manuela. (2008). The composition of applicants and entrants to teacher education programmes in Ireland: Trends and patterns. Irish Educational Studies, 27(3), 223-240. Lave J, Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning and Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McIntyre, D., & Hagger, H. (1992). Professional development through the oxford internship model. British Journal of Educational Studies, 40(3), 264-283. doi:10.1080/00071005.1992.9973930 McNally, J., Cope, P., Inglis, B. & Stronach, I. (1997). The student teacher in school: Conditions for development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(5), 485-498. Teaching Council. (2011a). Policy on the continuum of teacher education. Dublin: Author. Teaching Council. (2011b). Initial teacher education: Criteria and guidelines for programme providers. Dublin: Author. Teaching Council. (2013). Guidelines on school placement. Dublin: Author. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zeichner K. and Conklin H. (2008). Teacher Education programs as sites for teacher preparation. In M Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser & D. Mc Intyre (Eds). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring questions in changing contexts. New York/Abingdon: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Author Information

Sarah O'Grady (presenting / submitting)
St. Patrick's College, Dublin City University
Drogheda, Co. Louth
Rose Dolan (presenting)
Maynooth University, Ireland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.