Exhaustion - Already a Matter for Beginning Teachers?
Author(s):
Daja Preuße (presenting / submitting) Olga Mater (presenting) Susanne Schmidt
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 04 D, Teachers’ Work and Career Decisions

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-24
09:00-10:30
Room:
NM-Theatre P
Chair:
Bruno Leutwyler

Contribution

Burnout is becoming increasingly important in teacher research, as the teaching profession has been identified as highly stressful compared to other professional groups (cf. Abele & Candova, 2007). Emotional exhaustion can be seen as a major component of burnout (e. g. Cropanzano, Rupp, & Byrne, 2003). It represents the feeling of being emotionally sapped, fatigued and leached because of the job (Griffin, Hogan, Lambert, Tucker-Gail, & Baker, 2009). Especially for beginning teachers, the stress level is very high because teachers’ tasks are new to them. Besides the confrontation with complex school and teaching practices this initial phase is also characterized by growing personal responsibility, high expectations, and the process of finding one’s identity as a teacher. The international state of research indicates a high level of exhaustion very early on, during initial teaching experience, internships and the first years of teaching (Fives, Hammana, & Olivarez, 2007). Even so, the findings of Fimian and Blanton (1987) show that preservice and first year teachers have the same problems with a view to burnout as experienced teachers. Thus, the question arises whether job requirements, contextual conditions or individual attributes within the phase of first interactions in teaching practice increase or decrease exhaustion among young teachers.

Job requirements that could explain variations in teachers’ stress level include too many pupils in one class, the workload for preparing lessons, the level of social or subject-specific support, and many more (e. g. Kyriacou, 2001). Further, personal attitudes and resources play a significant role in the perceived stress. According with international state of research the results of Dicke et al. (2015) for German beginning teachers show: higher self-efficacy comes along with lower stress and burnout levels. Furthermore, international research indicates that job satisfaction – an affective estimate of the extent to which current success as a teacher is in accordance with one’s expectations and wants – is also associated with a lower stress and burnout level (cf. Griffin et al., 2009). The opposite holds true for job involvement, a motivational personal characteristic that represents the rank and importance of the job for the individual, and that is linked to higher exhaustion levels, especially when the expected income is not achieved (cf. Griffin et al., 2009).

International research has hardly taken into account these job-related requirements, individual characteristics and resources as potential moderating and mediating variables related to emotional exhaustion in preservice and beginning teachers. Three variable groups are considered relevant in terms of influencing burnout and exhaustion: 1) job-related requirements and conditions such as social support, 2) background variables such as gender, and 3) personal resources such as self-efficacy (see also Byrne 1999). For this presentation practical teaching experience during preservice internships and the first teaching years as a stress factor is assumed. The research aim is to examine whether the observations from current research can be replicated in beginning teachers with all predictors included.

Method

To answer the research question, a sample of 233 German beginning teachers was repeatedly surveyed over the course of two weeks in the summer of 2015 via online questionnaires. On average, teachers participated on eight daily surveys, which results in a data set for these evaluations of 1,776 observations. Data were assessed by a general survey and 12 daily surveys. All items were in German and had to be answered on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from “1-I do not agree at all” to “7-I totally agree”. The aim of the study was the assessment of teachers’ everyday experiences at work under the control of state and trait variables. Therefore, in the general survey we measured the independent stable variables job involvement, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, social support as well as background variables like gender or hours spending lessons. The dependent variable emotional exhaustion as a job-related factor that may vary throughout the testing period was measured with the daily surveys. Emotional exhaustion was assessed using the 8-item scale of OBI by Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, and Schaufeli (2001, adapted by Binnewies, Metzler, Scholl, & Sonnentag, 2008) (α=.91). The 10 items on job involvement originally stem from Kanungo (1982) (α=.85). General self-efficacy was assessed with a scale of ten items (α=.87) developed by Schwarzer and Jerusalem (1999). Job satisfaction was assessed with one item, asking for the general satisfaction with the job. For job-related requirements and conditions we assessed social support by superiors (5 items), colleagues (5 items) or persons from private surroundings (5 items) using the scale of social support by Frese (1989) (α=.82-.91). Due to repeated assessments of the same beginning teachers, the observations in the dataset are not independent from each other. To consider this, multilevel models were used where the variance of the dependent variable is decomposed in within-person and between-person portions (Snijders & Bosker, 2011). As in traditional regression analyses, several independent variables could be included in the model and the amount of explained variance with those variables could be investigated. Individual variance could be explained by including time-varying predictors (such as the day of the week), and interpersonal variance could be explained by including stable predictors (such as self-efficacy).

Expected Outcomes

In accordance with theoretical assumptions, the analysis showed that a high level of job involvement causes higher emotional exhaustion. In contrast, a high level of self-efficacy and a high level of job satisfaction reduce the level of emotional exhaustion. Approximately 31% of between-person variance could be explained with these predictors. Other factors, such as duration of employment, the amount of hours a teacher spent preparing or giving lessons, or participating in events beyond teaching, such as school staff meetings, did not show a significant influence on the level of exhaustion, neither in the mean exhaustion level during the twelve days nor in the general retrospective level of exhaustion as assessed in the very first questionnaire of the study. Further results and their possible explanations, as well as limitations of the study, will be discussed during the presentation.

References

Abele, A. E., & Candova, A. (2007). Prädiktoren des Belastungserlebens im Lehrerberuf: Befunde einer 4-jährigen Längsschnittstudie [Predicting Teachers’ Stress Experience: Findings from a 4-Year Longitudinal Study]. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(2), 107–118. Binnewies, C., Metzler, N., Scholl, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2008, October). Teaching with a Smile. A Diary Study on Emotion Regulation and Its Short-Term Outcomes at Work and At Home. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Emotions and Worklife, Fontainebleau, France. Byrne, B. M. (1999). Teacher-burnout: The nomological network. In R. Vandenberghe & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher-burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice. Cambridge: University Press. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., & Byrne, Z. S. (2003). The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 160–169. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., Holzberger, D., Kunina-Habenicht, O., Kunter, M., & Leutner, D. (2015). Beginning teachers’ efficacy and emotional exhaustion: Latent changes, reciprocity, and the influence of professional knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 62–72. Fimian, M. J., & Blanton, L. P. (1987). Stress, burnout, and role problems among teacher trainees and first-year teachers. Journal of Organizational Behavior 8(2), 157–165. Fives, H., Hammana, D., & Olivarez, A. (2007). Does burnout begin with student-teaching? Analyzing efficacy, burnout, and support during the student-teaching semester. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 916–934. Griffin, M. L., Hogan, N. L., Lambert, E. G., Tucker-Gail, K. A., & Baker, D. N. (2009). Job involvement, job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and the burnout of correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093854809351682 Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 341–349. Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher Stress: directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27–35. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (Eds.) (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen [Scales for the assessment of teacher and student characteristics]. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Author Information

Daja Preuße (presenting / submitting)
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany, Germany
Olga Mater (presenting)
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany, Germany
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.