Using Videos as Irritation and Door-Opener for Learning Processes in Teacher Education
Author(s):
Angelika Paseka (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2016
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 13 B, Research Approaches: Effects, Validation and Relationship

Paper Session

Time:
2016-08-26
13:30-15:00
Room:
NM-Theatre N
Chair:
Julia Planer

Contribution

To use videos for teacher learning has been much emphasized within the last years, in teacher preparation as well as in in-service training. In the USA, Great Britain, Germany and Switzerland online-tools were developed especially for teacher education. However, as some critical authors note, videos are just a tool and have to be embedded in a didactic concept to provoke learning processes. The central question is: What do students learn by watching videos and how do they learn?

To answer this question critically data of three courses at the University of Hamburg will be presented. The courses involved in the qualitative research project prepare teacher students for practical internship. A web-based learning platform with 40 short staged videos showing situations of uncertainty was used to make the teacher students aware of uncertainty as a constitutive element of teacher professionalism and of different options how to cope with uncertainty. On the basis of a concept of learning by Combe (2010) the learning process was organized in five steps: (1) provoking an irritation by looking videos and cutting them in very small scenes, (2) producing resistance by forcing students to describe just what they have seen and listened without providing evaluations and ratings, (3) experimenting by looking for further connections how the scene might go on, (4) thinking alone and discussing the answers in a community, (5) finding words and descriptions by writing protocols and a learning diary.

Method

Research methods: The plenary discussions with the students were recorded, transcribed and analyzed by qualitative content analysis (Mayring 2003). Categories were formulated inductively, sequential analysis were used in places where there were signs of consolidation (recognizable by controversal views, use of metaphors, etc.). At the end the discussion history was created by showing central topics and directions that emerged in the discussions.

Expected Outcomes

Results: The analyses of the students’ answers reconstruct that they prefer such options which defend their role as a teacher and the organizational structure of school. At the end of the course the comments show that the students start to question such answers and to develop an empathic attitude for the situation by trying to take the role of the pupils and to assess the situation from their point of view. The analyses of the final session make evident how the students coped with the irritation and their resistance. Reflecting critically from a meta-level the course was analyzed by using the concept of the three loops of learning by Argyris & Schön (1999). This concept originally developed to describe learning processes in organizations was adapted for reconstructing the learning processes, their organization and the role of the lecturers. The results make evident the antinomies in which the lecturers themselves are involved: being a teacher educator (align with the wish of the students to get answers how to cope with situations of uncertainty) versus being an educational scientist (align with the demand to initiate irritations without having answers and to provoke further questions).

References

Argyris, Ch., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational Learning II. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Combe, A. (2010). Wie lassen sich in der Schule Erfahrungen machen. Lernen aus der Sicht der Erfahrungstheorie. Pädagogik, 62 (7-8), 72-77. Helsper, W. (2004). Antinomien, Widersprüche, Paradoxien: Lehrerarbeit – ein unmögliches Geschäft? Eine strukturtheoretisch-rekonstruktive Perspektive auf das Lehrerhandeln. In B. Koch-Priewe, F.-U. Kolbe, & J. Wildt, J. (Eds.), Grundlagenforschung und mikrodidaktische Reformansätze zur Lehrerbildung (pp. 49-98). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt. Mayring, Ph. (2003). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken, 8th edition. Weinheim: Beltz.

Author Information

Angelika Paseka (presenting / submitting)
University of Hamburg, Germany

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.