Session Information
10 SES 13 A, Mentoring in Differing Education Contexts: Perspectives from Norway, Ireland and Australia
Symposium
Contribution
In the last decade, mentoring in teacher education at the University of Limerick has been reconceptualised as Productive Mentoring for an academic practice of knowledge co-construction within a socio-political context where context, care and an aesthetic of productive possibility matter (Mooney Simmie & Moles, 2011). This framework defines the key principles in a master’s study dedicated to educational mentoring involving over 300 professional practitioners from a diversity of educational settings (e.g. primary and secondary schools and higher education settings). The study provides academic accreditation for mentors seeking to ‘problematise’ mentoring as a clinical practice of competences and pre-scripted dispositions and as networked communities within hidden differential power relations. This master’s study eschews the concept of action research as problem-solving to ‘improve’ mentoring practices using a knowledge application methodology of ‘what works’ within a standpoint of educational research as a strategic science. Instead, university tutors work with mentor teachers as co-constructors of knowledge for a specialised and advanced professional practice, within a school-university partnership, where care and professional agency are valued and where, from a radical pedagogy perspective, there is an ongoing quest for alterative discourses to emerge within an aesthetic of productive possibility (Lonergan, Mooney Simmie & Moles, 2012; Mooney Simmie & Moles, 2012). For this paper, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the ways in which practitioners in formal leadership roles (e.g. school principals, deputy principals, programme coordinators, assistant principals and university tutors), ‘problematised’ mentoring in their master’s studies and the alignment with a ‘Productive Mentoring’ framework (Mooney Simmie & Moles, 2011) and complexity theory (Opfer & Pedder, 2011). The study has implications that go beyond country and continent in relation to mentoring as problem-solving within a clinical practice or as problem posing by mentors acting as co-constructors of knowledge and agents of change and care, within a specialised and advanced professional practice.
References
Lonergan, J., Mooney Simmie, G., & Moles, J. (2012). Mentoring to reproduce or change discourse in schools. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 1(2), 104-109. Mooney Simmie, G. & Moles, J. (2012). Chapter 7: Educating the Critically Reflective Mentor. In Sage Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, Sarah Fletcher and Carol A. Mullen (Editors), 107-121. Sage Publications. Mooney Simmie, G., & Moles, J. (2011). Critical Thinking, Caring and Professional Agency: An Emerging Framework for Productive Mentoring. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(4), 465-482. Opfer, V.D., & Pedder, D.G. (2011). Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning. Review of Educational Research, 81 (3), 376-407.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.