Understanding Chilean Student Teachers’ Self-Directed Learning Using Digital Technologies
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Poster

Session Information

10 SES 04.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2017-08-23
12:00-13:30
Room:
W4.corridor (Poster Area)
Chair:

Contribution

Teacher education programs in Chile are currently facing a dilemma. While teacher educators are more focused on using technology for teaching, student teachers enrolled in those programs are more familiar with the use of technologies for learning. Mass access to digital technologies is changing the way we learn, triggering autonomous forms of learning that challenge the traditional paradigm based on the simple idea that learning only occurs when someone plays the teacher role. Technology availability and the willingness of younger generations to take advantage of it create many interesting scenarios. In fact, young users of social networks and online entertainment who are also seeking specific disciplinary information include some student teachers (Fisher, Higgins, & Loveless, 2006). Teachers’ knowledge acquisition through the use of digital tools is a continuous process, self-initiated mainly in higher education. This process plays a crucial role in the way new teachers face pedagogical and disciplinary learning through their professional life (Cerda, 2013).

Teacher education programs in Chile historically have emphasized teachers’ professional knowledge acquisition, focusing in the implementation of teaching methods already deemed effective, with less attention to autonomous learning practices using digital technologies. Autonomous learning in education has been historically linked to the concept of self-directed learning. According to Merriam (2001), two major concepts have emerged in adult education: andragogy and self-directed learning. While andragogy focuses on how to teach adults, self-directed learning emphasizes the way adults learn by themselves. Garrison (1997) indicated that self-directed learning is a collaborative constructivist perspective and can be organized in three main elements: self-management, related with control issues; self-monitoring, addressing cognitive and metacognitive issues; and motivation, related to the initiation and maintenance of the task.

Another important element in self-directed learning is the new student teachers’ background and its relationship with technology. Beyond the debates about “digital natives” and “immigrant learners” (Prensky (2001, 2012), about whether young people can multitask, or their ability to perform well with technology beyond gaming or social networks, there is general consensus on one key point: young student teachers are highly connected and they are (probably) more skillful than their teachers at seeking information online, even though they looking for and finding information mainly from “informal” sources (e.g., Wikipedia) rather than the specialized research data bases.

The purpose of this study is to generate a grounded theory model about the underlying process of autonomous acquisition of teacher knowledge (pedagogical and disciplinary) through the use of digital learning technologies. The following research question serves as a starting point: Among Chilean student teachers, what are the underlying components in the process of teacher professional knowledge acquisition when they learn using learning technologies in a self-directed way?

Method

Participants in the study were selected through a two-step process. First, teacher educators from a public university located in southern Chile recommended several students based on a profile provided by the researcher. Each student was contacted by email and invited to a presentation of the project and an introductory interview. After being selected, they read and signed an informed consent approved by the university’s Human Subjects office. A total of 33 teacher students were interviewed in depth several times (if necessary) using an interview guide organized around topics like motivation, learning routines, and personal relation with digital technologies. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim to a word processor. The sample consisted of 13 females and 20 males, ranging from 18 to 25 years old. In order to generate a theoretical model, a constructivist grounded theory approach was used (Charmaz, 2006). Coding (initial and focused), constant comparison approach, memo writing, and theoretical sampling were the main grounded theory strategies used in the study.

Expected Outcomes

Results show the existence of an underlying theoretical model organized in three main areas where knowledge acquisition is implemented: the context, the student’s personal characteristics, and the process of seeking information online. The first area, context, refers to the academic program where two components emerged: Academic infrastructure related to the “program’s characteristics”, including the “availability of digital technologies” (hardware & software); and academic culture, which involves the types of “interactions between professors” and “student teachers’ academic identity”. The second area, student’s personal characteristics, relates to “student teachers’ disposition to teach and learn,” and “student teachers’ relationship toward digital technologies.” In general, a greater willingness to teach and learn will correspond to a higher construction of pedagogical knowledge. The third area, the process of seeking information online, is organized in five phases: “academic motivators toward learning”, “permanent assessment of tasks,” “autonomous learning,” “interaction with technologies,” and “permanent search for information.” Each phase is supported by a noncognitive factor (motivation, metacognition, self-regulated learning, computer self-efficacy and academic tenacity). The areas are articulated by three connectors: information literacy (relationship context and student teachers), learning with technologies (relationship context and process) and academic education for autonomous learning (relationship process and context). “Teaching vocation”, understood as the disposition to be academically prepared to support others, emerged as the core category of the model. A deeper understanding of self-directed learning processes may shape current and future directions for teacher education programs, and also for teacher professional development practices. Teacher education programs need to assume their responsibility to orient and model adequate uses of technologies for autonomous learning. If they do not take that challenge, student teachers will miss the chance to identify and experience early exemplary uses of technologies that may contribute to these future teachers’ ability to provide their students with even more learning opportunities.

References

Cerda, C. (2013, January 3-6). Using ICT to Support Teachers’ Self-directed Professional Learning. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement ICSEI, Santiago, Chile. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE. Fisher, T., Higgins, C., & Loveless, A. (2006). Teachers Learning with Digital Technologies: A review of research and projects. Retrieved from Bristol, UK: Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33. doi:10.1177/074171369704800103 Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3-14. doi:10.1002/ace.3 Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom: hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Corwin.

Author Information

Cristian Cerda (presenting / submitting)
Universidad de La Frontera
Departamento de Educación
Temuco
Universidad de La Frontera, Chile
Santa Clara University, USA

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.