Session Information
27 SES 09 C, Curriculum & Didactics : Subject learning
Paper/Poster Session
Contribution
As many realized studies have documented, it is highly important to active both learner’s basic sense channels simultaneously, e.g. verbal as well as pictorial, to improve an efficiency of learning (Mayer, 1997; Paivio, 2014). Therefore, school education should promote activation, interconnection and complementation of these channels by means of suitable proportion of the text and the visuals in educational process. In the geography education this might be accomplished through the activities with maps, which are contained in textbooks and mainly in school atlases.
Economic-geographical maps are school didactic aids which are commonly used in teaching and performs several functions, e.g. decoration, representation, illustration, organization and interpretation (Mayer, Gallini, 1990). The importance of this kind of teaching aids is to acquire knowledge and understanding, to improve skills and to streamline student attitudes (Ysar, Seremet, 2007). Restriction of the functions of visual didactic instruments may decrease the effectiveness of learning (Peeck, 1993). Nowadays, in the Czech schools are used many atlases from different publishers which intended for primary and secondary school students together. Although it may seem that the competition has positive effect on the quality of maps, unfortunately, it is not happening. Czech economic-geographical maps are criticized for overfullness, lack of transparency and worse readability by cartographers and geography teachers (e.g. Čapek, 1996; Novák, Kramáreková, 2003; Bláha et al., 2015). These facts caused that the effectiveness of teaching can be decreasing.
Educators, as well as the pupils are the only users of the educational cartographic media. Hence, the role of the cartographers in a dialogue about the development of effective school maps and atlases is crucial. Therefore, the analysis of above mentioned aspects in efficiency of learning is the first goal of our paper. The second goal of our paper is to assess suitability of different map key on the example of the economic-geographical maps in Czech school atlases for primary and secondary school students. These maps represent the extra-complex maps with multi-layer and fast developing content through time. Thus, it is legitimate thus to ask how to transmit the content to the learners on various levels of school education. Our research will find the answer to the following questions, in particular: How is significant to think about specialized atlases differentiated for primary and secondary schools? Is it possible to overcome the mentioned map complexity only with application of the cartographic generalization or the synthesis by means of synthetic maps? Which map symbols and means of map representation are sufficient for learners on various levels of school education?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
BLÁHA, J. D. 2010. Various ways of assessment of cartographic works. In: GARTNER, G. ORTAG, F. Cartography in central and eastern Europe: selected papers of the 1st ICA Symposium on cartography for central and eastern Europe. New York: Springer, pp. 211-231. BLÁHA, J. D. et al. 2015. Discussion about the cartographic production for schools I. Geografické rozhledy. 25(1), pp. 15-16 (in Czech). CHRASKA, M. 2000. Basics of Research in Pedagogy. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého (in Czech). ČAPEK, R. 1996. School economic maps. Acta Universitatis Carolinae geographica. 31(1), pp. 45-54. HANUS, M., MARADA, M. 2014. Map skills in Czech and foreign curriculum documents: a comparative study. Geografie: sborník ČGS. 118(2), pp. 158-178 (in Czech). OECD. 2015. ISCED 2011 Operational Manual: guidelines for classifying national education programmes and related qualifications. Paris: OECD. PAIVIO, A. 2014. Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. New York: Psychology Press. PEECK, J. 1993. Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction. 25(3), pp. 227-238. MAYER, R., GALLINI, J. 1990. When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words? Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(4), pp. 715-726. MAYER, R. E. 1997. Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), pp. 1-19. NOVÁK, S. KRAMÁREKOVÁ, H. 2003. Czech and Slovak cartographic production in the school atlases. Geodetický a kartografický obzor. 49(7–8), pp. 142-149 (in Czech). YASAR, O., SEREMET, M. 2007. A Comparative Analysis Regarding Pictures Included in Secondary School Geography Textbooks Taught in Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 16(2), pp. 157-188.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.